Back to Our Liberal Roots

 

We have often expressed our Liberal Values.  As Liberals, we believe:

1.   All Americans should have the same freedoms and opportunities.

2.   We are each responsible for protecting the freedoms and opportunities of all Americans. 

3.   We and our government should be competent and compassionate,

     using our freedoms and opportunities wisely and

     helping those with fewer freedoms and opportunities than the rest of us.

4.   Our United States should be a cooperative member of our world’s community of nations.

 

Gary Hart’s newly published The Courage of Our Convictions, A Manifesto for Democrats argues that Democrats must go back to our liberal roots, including the values expressed by presidents Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy and Johnson:

·       Roosevelt’s one national community with no American left behind’ - which agrees with our # 1 and 3 above.

·       Johnson’s Equality for all our citizens # 1 and 3

·       Kennedy’s civic duty and service - #2

·       Truman’s internationalism - #4

 

We Democrats Lose Our Convictions and Courage

Gary Hart argues that beginning in the 1970’s, we Democrats lost our commitment to these values.  With Johnson’s passage of the civil rights bill, southern conservatives switched from the Democratic to the Republican Party.  Oil shocks, declining productivity and foreign competition ended three decades of steadily increasing incomes.  Declining manufacturing employment reduced labor union membership.  More wives entered the labor force. White men reacted negatively to new competition from both Afro-Americans and women.  Financially threatened, middle class America reacted against programs to help our minorities and poor, losing our sense of being one national community.

 

With Reagan’s call for fewer taxes and less government, he capitalized on this discontent to initiate an era of Republican control.  In collaboration with business interests, he redefined government from being the solution (protecting workers and consumers) to being the problem (abusing businesses).  He demonized liberals and government workers for enabling incompetent poor people and labor leaders for taking advantage of workers.  A determined Cold Warrior, Reagan supported the military-industrial complex, leaving post-Vietnam War Democrats to be viewed as weak on defense.

 

This onslaught of changing economic and social circumstances and political calamity disheartened and divided Democrats.  While some Democrats sought to maintain traditional alliances and programs, others sought to distance themselves from them.  Like Republicans, they began posing as Washington outsiders and sought business alliances, at the expense of our less fortunate.  Losing our unity and courage, we Democrats could no longer clearly express our values.  Democrats no longer played offense, only defense.

 

We Democrats Now Need to Return to Our Roots

Republicans have now failed miserably and obviously to provide for our common welfare, severely harmed our economy, become obviously incompetent and corrupt, and forsaken our long bipartisan internationalism.  Gary Hart argues it is time for Democrats to return to our traditional values, express them courageously in contrast to Republican failures and propose policies to implement them under our present circumstances. 

 

We must restore our internationalism, reaching out to cooperate with other nations and provide leadership to create new international political institutions to respond to failed and corrupt societies and economic globalization.  We must restore our safety net (including crime prevention; health care; education; family friendly jobs; worker, consumer and environmental protections, and income for workers, dependents and retirees), providing all our citizens the security and assistance they need to pursue our American Dream.  Perhaps most difficult, we must revive a sense of shared patriotic responsibility.  We must create new balances of federal, state and local government, business and voluntary activity.  The result must be a new thrust among us that restores our sense of being one community of equals.

 

We confront a huge mixture of tasks, as Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy and Johnson did before us.  With the failures of both Democrats and Republicans in recent decades, many Democrats appear ready to provide principled leadership based upon our new realities.  And a majority of Americans appear ready to join in the task.  Let us proceed.  Other commentaries in our Time for a Change series will report and evaluate our progress.

 

Are Our Newly Elected Democrats Liberals?

Conservative and media pundits have rushed to proclaim that the Independent and Moderate voters who helped replace Republicans with Democrats in our federal, state and local races are more conservative than Democrats.  They assert that our newly elected Democrats that Independents and moderates helped elect are more conservative than long term office holders.  They predict that either paralysis or conflict among Democrats will occur, such that the Democratic revival will be short-lived. 

 

I believe these pundits are wrong.  They are wrongly assuming that the independents and moderates who voted for Democrats are not liberals.  One conservative pollster argued that Republicans can focus on their conservative base, because there are few voters who aren’t liberals or conservatives.  I agree.  When asked about their values, about 2/3rds of Independents express commitment to liberal values and 1/3rd to conservative values.  Virtually all of these liberal Independents vote for Democrats, except for those who vote for smaller liberal parties such as the Green and Independent parties.  Independents who vote for Democrats are likely as liberal as Democrats.

 

Moderates are often liberals who react against the label as it has been demonized by conservatives since Reagan.  They support our liberal values of freedom, opportunity, equality, competence and compassion.  They are against unnecessary government regulations, programs and spending, which they associate with the word ‘liberal’.  But contrary to what conservatives say, liberals are also against all of these.  Moderates are often liberals who don’t know what liberals are and that they are liberals.

 

An examination of the political positions of our newly elected members of congress reveals them to be liberal.  For example, Senator John Tester of Montana (http://www.testerforsenate.com/issues).   Many liberal organizations are proclaiming that most of the candidates that they supported won, including Progressive Majority, Emily’s list, NARAL Pro-Choice, Democrats For America and Citizens for Global Solutions.  The one Democratic senatorial candidate who appeared on the path to victory, but lost was Harold Ford of Tennessee who began expressing increasingly conservative positions. 

 

Democrats are ready to restore our American Dream

If Independents and moderates are similar in their values to liberals and the newly elected Democratic officials are liberals, then there is no reason to assume that Democrats will be paralyzed or divided.  Democratic strategists and leaders are already focused on winning the White House in 2008.  They have learned a lot during the last 12 years.  They are planning to begin by passing popular mainstream liberal legislation (hopefully with support from some Republicans) to implement ethical standards and practices for legislators, restore fiscal responsibility (including eliminating subsidies for wealthy industries) and repair torn parts of our safety net (such as updating our minimum wage, bargaining with drug companies to lower costs of drugs for Medicare recipients) and limiting interest rates on student loans. 

 

Democrats may delay dealing with issues where mainstream America does not yet have a consensus, such as gun control, reproductive choice, gay marriage.  They will probably not attempt to restore our basic civil rights by repealing the Patriot Acts until the ‘War on Terrorism’ hysteria fades away as did similar hysterias after the first and second world wars.  Delaying action on these issues not indicate that Democrats are not liberal.  They are just waiting until the time is right and they are strong enough.  I predict that united Democrats will be ready to win the presidency and even more congressional seats in 2008.

 

There will be competition for the 2008 Democratic nomination for president.  Hillary Clinton appears to have the best chances.  But it is difficult to know how consistently liberal she would be.  Her medical reform proposal, vote to authorize the Iraq War and other positions have been conservative; but she also indicates an ability to change.  I think John Edward and Al Gore (if he enters the race) are the most consistently liberal, with John Edward being a Southerner and well known in Iowa.  Barack Obama would be an attractive vice presidential candidate with any of the presidential candidates.  Various governors (Vilsack, Richardson and others) also may be candidates.  I believe that whoever wins the nomination will be supported by the other contenders.  Dave Thomas