Conservatives Oppose Our Political Priorities
I
doubt that any liberals disagree with the following priorities, although we may
disagree about how to realize them.
Conservatives may argue that they also agree with some of these
priorities. But their actions speak
louder than their words. It is
especially the new conservatives, Christian conservatives and libertarians who
opposed these. And traditional
conservatives have generally gone along with the new conservatives and
libertarians.
Conservatives Oppose Fair Elections
Both Liberals and Conservatives will
claim that they support fair elections. But their actions speak louder than
their words.
Republicans have gerrymandered districts to give them more victories than their
support makes fair. Republicans have continually resisted measures to make
registration and voting easier, citing fantasized possibilities that voters may
cheat. Republicans have given voters false information about where and when
elections are to be held.
Under Republican control in 2000 in
Republicans have resisted attempts to substitute public campaign financing for
private campaign financing, enabling wealthy and powerful private interests to
support the election of officials who will put their interests before the
public interest.
Conservatives Oppose Open Government
Liberals believe that open government
is necessary for voters to make informed decisions. Conservatives typically
don't want voters to make informed decisions. They believe in privacy for
government; but oppose privacy for people.
The Bush administration has instituted an unprecedented reign of privacy in
government, while invading people's privacy to an unprecedented extent. The
purpose of the secrecy is keep the public unaware of
unpopular and even illegal administration actions and incompetence.
During the Bush administration, huge numbers of documents are stamped secret,
even ones which have long been available publicly. Freedom of information
requests have been denied, delayed or delivered with so much important content
eliminated so as to be useless. Presidential papers are kept secret. Cheney met
secretly with lobbyists to formulate environmental policy. Executive privilege
is cited to prevent disclosure of executive decision making to congressional
oversight committees, rendering oversight impossible.
Conservatives Oppose Fair Taxes
The Bush administration's income tax
cuts and attempts to eliminate estate taxes are grossly unfair, not requiring
high income and wealthy people to pay for the institutional and cultural
heritage that enables their high incomes and wealth. Most
lower income people pay more FICA job tax than they do income tax, but
no attempt was made to reduce it. Auditing of high income and business tax
cheats has been much reduced, while auditing of earned income tax credits for
low income taxpayers has greatly increased.
For tax fairness, we need to establish progressive income and estate taxes. For
example, a progressive flat income tax might be 40%, with a deduction equal to
the medium income of similar families. Thus half of our families with the
lowest incomes would pay no income tax. Above the medium income, the tax rate
would increase with income from zero to close to 40% for the extremely wealthy.
Auditing should be proportional to the probability of cheating and the amounts
which might be recovered.
To quit discouraging employment, we should shift our taxes to support social
services from the jobs tax to a value added tax (VAT) which would discourage
consumption. Both the jobs tax and the VAT are somewhat regressive, but the
proposed income and estate taxes would be quite progressive.
Conservatives Oppose Competent Spending
Our Conservative Reagan and Bush
administrations have brought many business executives into their
administration, with their lower ethical standards than are customary to
government service. Our Bush administration and congressional colleagues have
richly rewarded their campaign contributors with jobs, corrupt contracts and
pork. They have attempted to turn our government into a collection of profit
centers for their private supporters
Our federal government's debt has soared, with most of the money wasted, ending up in private pockets without performance for the
public good. Our massive and growing public debt may expose us the greatest
economic meltdown we have ever experienced.
Conservatives Oppose Investment for Productivity
Private investors refuse to invest in
projects and programs which benefit the public, but not the individual
investor. Public investments in such projects and programs have repeatedly
proved beneficial and even crucial to enabling productivity.
Conservatives have consistently argued against public investments. They have
insisted that all cost beneficial investments should be made by private
entrepreneurs.
The Bush administration has grossly under funded our physical and social
infrastructure. Our roads, bridges, dams, public buildings, parks and other
physical infrastructure are deteriorating to become dangerous and a drag on our
productivity. Funding has similarly declined for scientific inquiry, health,
education and other aspects of our social infrastructure.
Increasing personal financial risks and declining social insurance reduce our
productivity. It is a no brainer for Democrats to resume public investments.
Conservatives Oppose Quality Health Care for All
Conservatives have attempted to destroy
Medicare instead of expanding it to include health care coverage for everyone.
Bush has under funded Medicare instead of instituting cost-benefit controls. He
has restricted our State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).
Conservatives insist that health care coverage should be provided by private
insurers, making it far too expensive to include everyone.
Conservatives continually say they oppose socialized medicine, including
government provided health care or government paid for health care. But they
never note that under these definitions, popular veterans
health care and Medicare are socialized medicine.
Conservatives added prescription medicine coverage for seniors by making them a
captive audience for private insurers, who were paid to offer coverage with no
regulation of medicine or insurance prices. The result is an enormous public
expense and
fewer benefits to seniors than if they had simply expanded Medicare to pay for
medicines for all seniors.
Conservatives Oppose Quality Education for All
Conservatives have opposed spending
enough money for public education to provide preschool education, to reduce
class sizes, to provide equal educational quality to all students and to
increase teacher's salaries to adequate levels, with higher salaries to attract
excellent teachers to schools serving culturally deprived students.
The 'No Child Left Behind' approach has penalized deficient schools instead of
granting them more resources. Conservatives have attempted to increase
inequality through providing vouchers to parents which they can use for private
schooling.
Conservatives have attempted to introduce Christian fundamentalism into our
schools, including the teaching of Creationism and of abstinence only sex education.
Conservatives Oppose Quality Jobs for All
Conservatives have supported globalization
which does not protect our workers, consumers, or environment. They have
opposed unionization, including allowing companies to unlawfully oppose
attempts by workers to create unions. They have eliminated and failed to
enforce many worker safety requirements. They have opposed family leave and
other family friendly work requirements. They have opposed protecting our
disabled, gays and lesbians, women and seniors from job discrimination.
Under the bush administration, labor participation rates have declined, as many
workers have given up trying to obtain full time employment. Temporary jobs
have increased. Needed foreign workers are denied entry to the
Conservatives Oppose Quality Retirement for All
Conservatives support regressive
taxation that hurts low income retirees. They have tried to destroy Social
Security. They have allowed grave deterioration of pensions and retirement
savings. Instead of simply expanding existing single payer coverage, they
passed Medicare Part D which mandates expensive private insurance for
prescription medicines.
Conservatives Oppose Protecting Our Environmental
Conservatives have supported private
and public activities which consume scarce resources and pollute our
environment, without concern for mitigation, paying for externalities or
consideration of long term costs. Especially damaging has been their support
for military activities, while exempting them from environmental protection
laws.
Conservatives have attempted to eliminate environmental protection laws, render
them ineffective, or failed to enforce them. Instead of protecting
environmentally sensitive areas, they have attempted to make them available to
developers and mineral extractors. They have not maintained our National Parks
and other public lands, attempted to privatize them and replaced highly
qualified public employees with private firms which provide much less service.
They have allowed private uses of public lands which pollute them.
The Bush administration has far surpassed Reagan as a despoiler of our
Conservatives Oppose Energy
To become independent of foreign
sources of oil, we must either reduce our consumption of oil or produce more
oil. But in spite of Conservative claims, we can not produce more oil, without
unbearable environmental and economic costs.
We can only reduce our consumption.
We can reduce our consumption through using oil more efficiently. And we can find renewable energy substitutes
for oil.
Conservatives have opposed attempts to
use less energy, including oil. They have resisted requiring increased vehicle
mileage. They have resisted placing taxes on oil. They have resisted
subsidizing homes and businesses which adopt technologies for reducing energy
consumption.
Conservatives have generally resisted rewarding the substitution of other
sources of energy for oil. An exception is subsidies for using corn based
ethanol for fueling vehicles, since agro-businesses repay Conservative in
campaign contributions. But production of corn based ethanol uses almost as
much oil as using oil directly as vehicle fuel. And it diverts corn from food
to fuel, raising the prices of food.
Conservatives have supported oil consumption to the profit of oil companies which
repay them with campaign contributions. Our oil reserves are dwindling such
that increased drilling produces little additional oil. Yet conservatives have
continually supported additional drilling even in environmentally fragile
locations.
Instead of supporting energy independence, Conservatives have supported heinous
dictators in the Mid East to maintain access to the oil they control. They have
even used false arguments to invade
Conservatives Oppose Equal Rights
The Bush administration has continued
to illegally invade our privacy, spy on our communications, invade our homes,
violate habeas corpus, deny legal representation, torture prisoners and render
them to other countries for torturing and more. It has often resisted measures
to enhance the equal rights of women, ethnic minorities, immigrants, gays, our
disabled, wounded veterans, our poor, etc.
They have attempted to politicize our justice system through the appointment of
regressive judges and politically responsive U.S. attorneys. The number of
investigators of white collar crimes has been reduced, including the
investigation of companies which violate consumer protection regulations.
Unfortunately the general public and many of our Democratic legislators have
scarcely protested these steps toward a police state. This is perhaps the area
where liberal principles are required more than any other.
Conservatives Oppose Protecting Our Personal Security
The Bush administration ignored El Qaeda
until after the September 11, 2001 attacks. Our occupation of
Katrina revealed how inadequate our homeland security is. The Bush
administration has corruptly granted no-bid unsupervised contracts to political
supporters in both
The Bush administration has focused law enforcement upon terrorist threats to
the extent that white collar and other crimes are not being investigated and
prosecuted.
Conservatives Oppose International Cooperation and
Leadership
From
In Conclusion
The cynics are completely
wrong. There are enormous differences
between Liberals and Conservatives, between Democrats and Republicans, between
the blue majority of American opinion and the red minority. While our liberals and Democrats are not always
consistent in holding and attempting to realize our liberal values and
priorities, the conservatives and Republicans are almost always consistent in
opposing them.