Puget Sound Liberals Weekly Newsletter #133

Enhancing Freedom, Opportunity and Cooperation in Puget Sound and Beyond

Through informing and networking Liberals and Liberal Organizations.

 

Our vision is hundreds of thousands of well-informed Puget Sound Liberals working together.

 

   2300 members                                                               August 1, 2008                                                                                                                                      

 

 

 

 

                                                     

Our Website                                   Our  Editor                  To Unsubscribe

 

                        Table of Contents  *Featured Articles

 

About Puget Sound Liberals

Opportunities, Petitions and Feedback

 

Commentaries from Our Members

Noemie Maxwell Interviews Corrections Chief

Todd Boyle on Hosting a KC Neighborhood Meeting

 

Liberals and Democrats Links to the Beef

How Much Is Racism Helping John McCain?*

As Expected, the McCain Campaign is whining.*

Bush, the Decider-in-Chief

 

State and Local  Links to the Beef

Sound Transit’s Proposal is Short-Sighted and Costly.

Only 1/3 of Trips are work related.

Our State Tax System Is Becoming Less Productive.*

Dino Rossi Hides His Conservative Social Views.

 

Nation and World  Links to the Beef

Naomi Klein: Shock Crony Capitalism**

To Revive our Economy, Investment or Consumption*

Free Choice Act -> Unionization -> Social Benefits

 

Our Liberal Spirit

Fear as a Political Economic Strategy*

 

Recommended Books

 

 

 

Our Political Values

 

Our Political Priorities

·       Fair Clean Elections and Open Government

·       Fair Taxes and Competent Spending

·       Investment for Productivity

·       Quality Health, Education, Jobs, Income and Retirement

·       Environmental Protection and Energy Independence

·       Security and Equal Rights

·       Justice and Peace Everywhere

·       International Cooperation and Leadership

 

Conservatives oppose all of these

 

     Let’s End Our National Nightmare

 

         Let’s Restore Our American Dream

 

More on Conservative opposition to our American Dream

 

Washington State’s 4 Major Needs

·       Federal Funding for Health and Education

·       A Progressive Income Tax

·       Public Campaign Financing

·       Replacing Republican Legislators

 

Quotes of the Week

No passion so effectually robs the mind of all its powers of acting and reasoning as fear.  Edmund Burke (1729 - 1797), "A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful", 1756

 

It is when power is wedded to chronic fear that it becomes formidable.  Emily Dickinson (1830 - 1886)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Calendar of Events

 

King County Democrats - LD Meetings            Some 2008 Legislature Lobby Days

 

Thurston County Progressive Net                  Western Washington Fellowship of Reconciliation

 

Alliance for Democracy                                Democratic Underground.Com                          

 

Town Hall Seattle Calendar                            Sierra Club Cascade Chapter Calendar          

       

Washington Public Campaigns Calendar          Conversation Cafe      Drinking Liberally                              

 

Washington State Labor Council                     Whatcom County Peace and Justice Calendar 

 

Wallingford Neighbors for Peace and Justice – Friday Night Movies      Liberal films on PBS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Calendar of Events

Saturday, August 2 at Noon at the Seattle Federal Courthouse (700 Stewart Street, Seattle) – Anti-War Rally.

Sunday, August 3 at 1 PM at Green Lake Park (look for earth flag near 4th & East Green Lake Drive, ) – Potluck Picnic and Dialogue with E.P. Menon on the State of the World.

Monday, August 4 at 1 PM at home of Beth Brunton (dead end at 29th and Holgate) - Potluck Picnic and Dialogue with E.P. Menon on the State of the World, sponsored by Rainier Valley Neighbors for Peace and Justice.

Tuesday, August 12 at 6:30 PM at Temple B’nai Torah (15727 NE 4th Street, Bellevue) – Washington Health Care Caucus, presented by The Healthy Washington Coalition.

Saturday, September 6 at 6 PM at Mainstage Comedy Club (315 – 1st Avenue North, Seattle) – Second annual “Pro-Choice Pop Star,” a karaoke contest, comedy show and cocktail mixer in support of NARAL Pro-Choice Washington.

 

Barbara Rader of Black Widow Web Development created our Puget Sound Liberals Website, to which I can easily add, modify and remove files.  Learn more about this unique company, which offers a 50% discount for organizations that promote social justice and environmental stewardship.  Dave Thomas

 

 

Opportunities, Petitions and Feedback

 

Communication with Our Members and Feedback

 

Our Website has been improved.  Our Basic Training menu now offers more commentaries.  Our Commentary menu offers four new pages formed by combining commentaries which have appeared in our newsletter:

 

·       2008 Elections

·       Three Crises: Peak Oil, Financial Bubble and Global Warming

·       Reforming Our Washington State Tax System

·       Affordable Housing and Urban Transportation

 

These will be updated as more relevant commentaries are published.  Dave Thomas

 

Opportunities

See What the Iraq Occupation has cost us to this minute.

How Would You Spend $3 Trillion instead of Iraq?

Try MoveOn’s new game: What’s the difference between President Bush and Senator John McCain?

Wellstone Action provides organizing tools online.

See Paul Loeb’s organizing tools:  one,  two,   three.

Wellstone Action canvassing instructions

Take a quiz concerning how green is your vacation.

See the Story of Stuff (video).

Barack Obama invites you to join in writing our Democratic Party’s platform.  

Do you want a job with Russ Feingold’s 2008 Patriot Corps?

Sign up for Democracy for America Night School featuring George Lakoff.

See Barack Obama’s speech on national security and the war in Iraq (video).

 

Petitions and Donations

Endorse the Global Marshall Plan proposed by the Network of Spiritual Progressives.

Tell your congress members to reject President Bush’s attempt to restrict use of contraceptives.

Tell your congress members to reject drilling sensitive places for oil.

Tell your congress member to protect black bears from poaching.

 

Commentaries From Our Members

 

Noemie Maxwell Interviews Corrections Chief

 

Conversation with Chase Riveland, Head of Washington Corrections when the tough-on-crime wave hit posted on Washblog on July 28, 2008

When Chase Riveland came to Washington in 1986 to head up the state's Department of Corrections he stepped into the eye of a storm.   Behind him was an era of institutional crisis that culminated in riots at Walla Walla and Monroe and was brought under control by his predecessor, Amos Reed (1980-1986). Just ahead, Washington was about to be swept up in a national tough-on-crime wave that would lead to a tripling of the state's incarceration rate.  

This was a key turning point for the state and Riveland was instrumental in setting a course that brought Washington through these years with fewer negative impacts than many other states have experienced.  He not only resisted the political fads of the day but also actively reached out to the policy community and the public.  In 1993, for example, he and other corrections and criminal justice professionals founded the Campaign for an Effective Crime Policy, which sought to break through the rhetoric on crime and bring information to policymakers on "what works" to reduce it.  For complete interview.  Noemie Maxwell

 

Email from Todd Boyle on Hosting a KC Neighborhood Meeting

 

During the last election you may recall, the ballot initiative passed, calling for establishment of neighborhood meetings on critical subjects--- to provide advice and consent to the King County.  It's run by the County Auditor's department. 

I recommend you all participate in the next round, by hosting these meetings.   At the meeting I hosted, everybody who came was rightwing, pro-cars and freeways, favoring more real-estate and business development, anti-social services, etc.   While spreading lies and gutter talk about the bus system and sound transit, they rarely rode the system, and couldn't care less about global warming or peak oil, or the oil wars,  Todd  Boyle  [
See report of previous meetings and sign up as host.]

 

 

Liberals and Democrats

 

How Much Is Racism Helping John McCain?

 

Based on unsure assumptions, this commentary is speculative.  Suppose that Barack Obama leads John McCain 52% to 48%.  Polls show that 15% to 20% of voters won’t vote for an African American.  Let’s assume that these 15% racist voters are supporting John McCain.  Subtracting 15% from 48% gives McCain 33% among non-racist voters. 

 

Assume that if the 15% racist voters (many of whom live in our Conservative South) weren’t racist, 2/3 would support McCain and 1/3 would support Obama.  Then 52% + 5% = 57% would support Obama and 33% + 10% = 43 % would support McCain.  Instead of leading by 4%, Obama would be leading by 14%. 

 

According to these assumptions, racism is costing Obama 10%, which he has been able to make up and some more by appealing better to the non-racist voters.  These figures may be wrong, but they suggest a way of thinking about the racist aspect of our presidential contest.

 

As Expected, the McCain Campaign is whining.

 

John McCain repeatedly called for Barack Obama to visit Iraq.  Obama’s trip generated lots of media coverage.  Iraq’s prime minister called for the end of American occupation of Iraq in accordance with Obama’s strategy.  Obama made an outstanding speech in Berlin.  He received favorable coverage.

 

Now the McCain campaign is whining that the media isn’t being fair.  They should give more coverage to John McCain.  Who has primarily been repeating again and again and again that Obama didn’t support the long so-called lsurge. 

 

Notice that when the media were repeatedly covering Barack Obama’s difficult relations with his pastor Jeremiah Wright and his statement about bitterness, Obama’s campaign never whined.  Conservatives are whiney victims.  Liberals are happy warriors.  With very few exceptions on either side.

 

Bush, the Decider-in-Chief

 

It is appropriate to call George Bush a decider.  When running for election in 2000, he deceived us about his enormous tax cuts for the rich, his desire to cut government spending, his willingness to leave debt to future generations, his support for corruption, his anti-environmentalism, his non-compassionate conservatism, his foreign policy, his partisanship and other positions.  

 

Since taking office in 2001, Bush has consistently decided to impose his real political views on our government and our people.  Bush has been remarkably successful, especially through executive action.  With support from our House of Representatives from 2001 to 2007 and Senate from 2003 to 2007, he passed tax cuts, the ‘No Child Left Behind’ bill, the Medicare prescription drug bill and cuts to many social programs.  He failed his attempt to wreck social security and dismantle other social programs to the extent he wanted.

 

Bush also deceived us by saying that he was following the advice of generals concerning the occupation of Iraq.  He pursued his aggressive policy while silencing dissenting generals.  Since flip-flopping when he became president, he has been remarkably consistent, including during the last several years with the Democrats in control of the House.  He has been the decider-in-chief.

 

In 2004, John Kerry was accused of flip-flopping.  More recently, both Democratic and Republican candidates have been accused of flip-flopping.  Some such as Mitt Romney and John McCain have flip-flopped big-time.  Virtually all have sometimes modified their positions.  Don’t we wish that President Bush had been less a decider and more a flip-flopper since taking office? 

 

On the other hand, Bush’s stubborn consistency has wrecked the Republican Party, while not achieving various things that he might have achieved through being more pragmatic.  It will take time and effort to recover our American Dream which Bush has so badly damaged, but Bush’s legacy will be of shorter duration than has been pragmatic Ronald Reagan’s legacy.

 

Here’s the Beef

What health care proposal to put in Democratic Party platform will be key struggle.

Our do-nothing congress is doing nothing due to President Bush and Congressional Republicans.

Commercial media uncritically accept John McCain’s claim that surge alone has reduced violence.

Commercial media ignore impeachment testimony.

New York Times says people moving to middle.  Data shows them becoming more consistently Liberal.

The most optimistic poll numbers for Barack Obama yet.

Evangelical PAC ‘Matthew 25 Network’ supports Obama and reducing financial inequality.

Our Hispanic vote may give Barack Obama various western and southern states.  For more.  For more.

For more.

Young people will vote in record numbers, mainly supporting Barack Obama.

Obama’s campaign is superior in grass roots, internet, financing, message and staff cohesion.

Obama campaign is advertising in 20 Red States, which may force McCain to spend resources there.

Barack Obama is raising more money than John McCain in red state Idaho.

See what Barack Obama has done to support our veterans.

John McCain may lose his home state of Arizona, perhaps due to Hispanic voters.

John McSexist?   Hillary Clinton on President Bush’s making contraceptives less available.

John McCain and oil industry lobbyists.  Oh, so close.  (Video)  For more.  For more.

Republicans propose more drilling for American oil.  Our public opposes it.

Not just McCain.  Obama’s advisers also include people responsible for our credit collapse.

Barack Obama away and back home.

Overseas, Barack Obama filled a vacuum of American leadership.

Barack Obama spoke of European walls, but not of the Israeli wall.  Failed to study Palestine.

Barack Obama opposes U.S. government support for Chevron’s abuse of Ecuadorian people.

Both Barack Obama and John McCain are planning for their transition to president.

MoveOn doesn’t organize so much as it enables mass expression of political views.

Liberals need to emphasize need for balance between Individual and Common Good.

 

State and Local

 

Sound Transit’s Proposal is Short-Sighted and Unduly Expensive

 

Sound Transit is placing a $17.9 billion light rail proposal on our fall ballot.  Unfortunately, Sound Transit doesn’t give us sufficient information about alternatives.  In the absence of such information, we can’t reasonably respond to their preferred alternative.  Suppose they begin with a vision of connecting all population, work and shopping centers.  Then develop a phased plan for doing this.

 

They certainly haven’t done this for our Eastside.  Sound Transit last updated its Long Range Plan in 2005.  But they chose for our fall ballot the transit service expansions that they say would make the biggest and quickest improvements for commuters for the least cost.  Unfortunately their Eastside proposal isn’t compatible with their long range plan.  Nor is it at the least cost. 

 

Sound Transit proposes paying for light rail extensions by increasing our regressive sales tax by 0.5%.  More fair would be to pay for it with a payroll tax, which would affect commuters who will benefit most from light rail alternatives.

 

Letter published by Seattle Times on July 27, 2008

While King County Executive Ron Sims believes Sound Transit's Phase 2 Plan is the "the wrong investment at the wrong time" [Times, guest commentary, July 23], and the honorable Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels cites many lame reasons to delay in his tongue-in-cheek support for the plan, it is a distinct lack of real leadership that has us in the commuter version of a pickle jar.

 

The proposal to extend the rail project to Overlake does not adequately address the total region's dire needs.  Lack of leadership is the reason we are only dreaming of connecting the Eastside to downtown Seattle via rail. Visionary leadership would have us looking at extending this project in totality from Tacoma to Lynnwood and beyond. Strong leaders would put a plan in place to include Eastgate, Issaquah and beyond.

 

What we lack is a credible leader with vision to put a plan together to make our whole region the beneficiary of a real Sound Transit plan and alleviate the cluster job of commuting for as many as possible.  Any plan that does not reach far into the bottlenecked regions is shortsighted. Where are the true visionaries and leaders in this community? Isn't this area continuing to grow and expand in all directions?

 

Why are we stuck in the inactive study mold and not already building light rail north and south, across I-90 and out to the hills? Look in the mirror, Mr. Sims and Mr. Nickels.  We give you our trust to lead, and you both came up lame.  Dave Sharpy

 

Letter published by Seattle Times on July 27, 2008

The answer to your $18 billion question is "no." Sound Transit proposes nothing that will directly benefit me or my family: The light-rail system doesn't go to or from anywhere we ever go. The alleged indirect benefits, such as reduced road congestion, are amorphous at best.

 

Sound Transit has demonstrated its ability to give us about 10 cents worth of transit for each tax dollar they get from us. Now they want $18 billion, including about $12 billion for 34 miles of rail service — that's $353 million for each mile. We already have the highest sales tax in the nation, and they want to raise it still higher.

 

This bloated bureaucracy has too many directors assigned to too many committees and subcommittees, and too many consultants, advisers and employees to ever operate efficiently. The best thing they can do is to finish the projects now under construction and turn those projects when completed over to local transit authorities.  Harry Petersen

 

Only 1/3 of Trips (Tours) are work related.

 

 

Table 1. Number of Tours

|

Table 2. Number of Stops

TOUR PURPOSE

1999

2006

CHANGE

|

TOUR PURPOSE

1999

2006

CHANGE

Work

1,290,809

1,389,928

7.7%

|

Work

3.10

3.04

-1.7%

School

573,634

580,984

1.3%

|

School

2.49

2.47

-0.7%

Escorted

313,539

368,102

17.4%

|

Escorted

2.67

2.66

-0.4%

Personal Business

290,762

400,661

37.8%

|

Personal Business

2.81

2.84

1.0%

Shopping

353,117

346,188

-2.0%

|

Shopping

2.84

2.83

-0.5%

Eating Out

108,326

169,183

56.2%

|

Eating Out

2.72

2.60

-4.3%

Social/Civic

140,666

263,729

87.5%

|

Social/Civic

2.60

2.72

4.5%

Recreation

484,106

445,737

-7.9%

|

Recreation

2.63

2.54

-3.3%

Total Tours

3,554,959

3,964,511

11.5%

|

Total

2.73

2.72

-0.1%

No Travel (persons)

116,615

91,604

-21.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

How Travel Behavior is Different in 2006 over 1999:

·       Tour growth matching population growth at 11 percent

·       More tours are being made for personal business, social/civic activities, and eating out

·       Fewer tours being made for work, school and shopping

·       21 percent more people are forgoing trips altogether

·       People are making fewer stops on work and school tours

·       Escorted tours (where someone is picked up or dropped off) are taking 6 percent longer

 

From July 2008 Regional View, published by Puget Sound Regional Council

 

Rapidly changing gasoline prices may change these patterns.  Dave Thomas

 

Our State Tax System Is Becoming Less Productive

 

From 1996 to 2005, the proportion of our personal income which we paid for local taxes stayed the same at 3.8% of income ranking us at 32-34 compared to other states.  The proportion of our income which we pay for state taxes has declined from 8.2% to 6.8%, with our ranking declining from 13 to 27.  We pay a lesser proportion of personal income for state and local taxes than is the average for other states.  In 2005, we paid 10.6% compared to 11.3%, placing us 37th among all states.  For more.  For more. 

 

 

Our Washington State Budget & Policy Center reports:

 

A Shrinking Revenue Stream

In fiscal year 1995, state and local taxes as a share of personal income was 11.7 percent in Washington State, a lower share than only 10 other states. During the economic boom of the 1990s, 32 states reduced the share of personal income paid in taxes, but only one state (Alaska) did so more than Washington State. By fiscal year 2000, a series of tax reductions had lowered taxes in Washington as a share of personal income to 10.2 percent of personal income, a level where it essentially has stayed since.

 

At the state level, it is estimated that the 1990s tax cuts cost the state eight percent of its revenue. During the following economic downturn, the state was faced with cutting important programs and a downgraded bond rating.

 

The most recent data available does not include the biennial state budget recently passed by the legislature. However, earlier analysis by the Center found that state government spending levels in the current budget, when measured relative to the growth in personal income, is broadly in line with the spending trends established in the 1990s.3 While Washington State’s exact present-day ranking may differ from the 2005 ranking, there is little reason to believe that current taxation levels materially alter Washington State’s current position among the lower tier of states.

 

The structural deficit

The steep tax cuts in the 1990s have exacerbated a basic revenue structure that does not grow in step with the economy. If left unreformed, it will threaten the state’s ability to fund important public priorities including educa­tion, transportation, health care, and preparation for another economic slowdown.

 

Our Washington State Budget & Policy Center also reports:

 

The current state budget dedicates just over six percent of the economy (measured by total personal income) to fund public priorities such as education, transportation, and health care. This investment in our state is at a level that has been consistent for over a decade.

 

State economists expect that revenue in the next ..two-year budget cycle will be insufficient to maintain current vital commitments, threatening our ability to fund public priorities and respond to emergent needs.

 

Revenue increases are an appropriate response to ..the expected deficit. Proposals for deep budget cuts are unwarranted given the steady level of public investment over the last decade and the importance of public investments to all Washingtonians.

 

A June 20, 2008 report states:

 

Forecast further underlines need for revenue

As a state, we have rightfully made significant long-term investments in public education, health care, and early learning. As the overall economy weakens, residents rely even more on public structures to thrive and prosper in times of insecurity.

 

Today , the state's Economic and Revenue Forecast Council revised their estimate of the amount of money available for the state budget. They expect a $167 million reduction in revenue due to ongoing economic problems including oil prices and the housing slump. Others factors contribute another $57 million decrease.

 

The new revision does not significantly alter the fiscal challenges we face. As we have said before, these challenges arise from an ongoing structural deficit in which state revenue does not keep up with spending. In the upcoming legislative session, it is expected that the state's budget writers will have to deal with a budget deficit of over $2 billion, endangering the state programs that people need.

 

The continuing projection of a significant deficit is a matter of public concern and a deliberate conversation about how to close the gap should begin in earnest. It is important to note, the problem is not one of spending; current budget figures are largely in line with past budgets as a share of the economy (see figure above). Instead, changes to our revenue structure must be part of the discussion.  For more about our Washington State Budget and Policy Center’s partners and sources.

 

Our Washington State Office of Financial Management reported in 2002:

 

Over the past 30 years, actual expenditures have grown at about the same rate as the economy (as indicated by personal income).

Since revenues (without tax changes) tend to grow more slowly than personal income, taxes and fees were raised periodically to keep pace.

 

Reserves have not been allowed to grow very large during good economic times. They were quickly depleted due to increased spending or tax cuts.

 

In the future, General Fund revenue would roughly keep pace with spending pressures –provided all caseloads and costs per case increase by population growth and general inflation.

 

However, health care “inflation,” together with the future effects of tax cuts and spending initiatives, contributes to large projected structural deficits.

 

Some implications of government spending growing more slowly than personal income

It will be hard for salaries and benefits to keep pace with those in the private sector. Private sector salaries grow faster than inflation, capturing the productivity gains in the economy.

 

It will be hard for spending on education, health care, and safety (comprising 80% of current budget), to keep pace with citizen demands.

 

On the other hand, Productivity gains and less spending on the rest of government(20% of budget) could help make room for a portion of the growth pressures in compensation, education, health care, and public safety..   For complete report.

 

Dino Rossi Hides His Conservative Social Views

 

Dino Rossi portrays himself as favoring smaller government and fiscal responsibility.  Since our government mostly provides education, social services and transportation, reducing our state government requires reducing these.  Is it fiscally responsible to underpay our teachers and state employees?  Is it fiscally responsible to make our unfair taxes more unfair by enacting tax breaks for the wealthy while reducing services to our poor?  Is it fiscally responsible to support private insurance companies which seek to provide fewer services at greater cost?

 

Dino Rossi’s campaign doesn’t exhibit his Conservative social views, which greatly differ from those of our Washington people.  He opposes access to contraceptives and abortions, equal rights for gays.  He supports teaching religion in schools.  For more.

 

Here’s the Beef

See who’s filing to run for Washington state and federal offices.

Washington building industry to spend $1.4 million to elect Dino Rossi.  For more.   More.  More.

House foreclosures and falling prices offer opportunity to increase affordable housing.

Communities are requiring banks to maintain foreclosed properties.

Senator Maria Cantwell demands safe affordable housing for all Americans/

Provisions of the Affordable Housing Investment Act of 2008, sponsored by Maria Cantwell

Senator Maria Cantwell commends local affordable housing efforts.

Senator Patty Murray supports Sound Transit’s decision to put transit proposal on fall ballot.

Sound Transit is short sighted, not planning to eventually connect our many population centers.

Sound Transit is bloated.  Their plans unduly expensive.  They only plan to serve a few centers.

How about car free Sundays in Seattle?

Governor Christine Gregoire emphasizes need for cleaning up Puget Sound.

Portland General Electric is experimenting with electric car recharging stations.

Farm employers push for a new guest worker program.

See how your state legislator scored on environmental issues.

 

Nation and World  

 

Naomi Klein: Shock Crony Capitalism

 

Several months ago, Ray McBain told me that I must read Naomi Klein’s 2007 book, The Shock Doctrine.  Based on his description, I rejected the thought that so many events could be explained by conscious attempts to produce disasters.  I have now read the book.  Ray McBain was right.  I was wrong. 

 

Naomi Klein has shown that a series of apparently unrelated events are part of a pattern.  Great books often introduce a new paradigm for understanding reality.  Naomi Klein gives us a fuller understanding of events described by such books in our Books for Liberals list as:

·       Norm Chomsky, 1979, The Washington Connection and Third World Fascism

·       Christopher Hitchens, 2002, The Trial of Henry Kissinger

·       John Perkins, 2004, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man*

·       Jeffrey D. Sachs, 2005, The End of Poverty, Economic Possibilities for Our Time

·       Zbigniew Brzezinski, 2004, The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership*

·       George Soros, 2004, The Bubble of American Supremacy*

·       John Newhouse, 2004, Imperial America, The Bush Assault on the World Order

 

Our American foreign policy has always been influenced by the foreign interests of American businesses.  During the Cold War, we supported numerous foreign dictators who treated American businesses favorably at the expense of their own workers, small businesses, consumers, taxpayers, resources and environment.  We assisted the overthrow of Democratically elected leaders in Iran (1953), Guatemala (1954), Indonesia (1965) and Chile (1971).

 

Naomi Klein describes the increasing influence (beginning in the 1950) of the Chicago Economic School’s and Especially Milton Friedman’s market fundamentalism as an alternative to Keynesian managed capitalism.  With the expectation that productivity and prosperity would result, this Neo-Conservative movement’s agenda for governments includes:

·       Removing all rules and regulations which prevented maximizing profits.

·       Privatizing all public activities through which private businesses could make a profit.

·       Reduce funding of the physical and social infrastructure.

·       Reducing taxes, especially for the wealthy (who supposedly would invest their money).

The neo-conservatives are wrong.  Wherever this agenda has been adopted, the result has been a crony capitalism, increasing income and wealth disparity, and reduced prosperity for the great majority of people. 

 

In addition, the Neo-Conservatives quickly learned that democracies resisted the adoption of this agenda.  They realized that they first had to destroy democracy and popular resistance.  In Indonesia and Chile, the introduction of the Neo-Conservative agenda was accompanied by torture and murder of anyone likely to resist.  Chile became the Neo-Conservative’s showcase.  Under dictators and with the support of our U.S. government and U.S. companies doing business there, Chile’s example spread to Argentina and Brazil.  These countries which had been developing rapidly, stopped developing.

 

Neo-Conservatives then discovered that even democracies could adopt much of their agenda, if they were first subjected to an economic shock.  In the aftermath of oil price increase influenced stagflation, Ronald Reagan was elected U.S. president.  He and his successors partly succeeded in deregulating, privatizing, cutting infrastructure expenditures and cutting taxes.  The result has been increased corruption, increasing income and wealth disparity, and increased economic insecurity for most Americans.  In the aftermath of the 1982 Falkland Islands war, Margaret Thatcher used her popularity to adopt similar measures to Reagan’s in Britain with similar results.

 

South American and other countries returned to democracy in the mid-1980s.  Under dictators, many countries had borrowed large sums of money which were never invested to be able to service these loans.  Foreign capital also came.  Then when U.S. Federal Chairman Paul Volker raised interest rates to quell American inflation, indebted countries could not service their debts.  They found it necessary to ask the IMF to arrange new loans to service their debt.  Acting as an enforcer or collector for the American banks who had made the loans and staffed by Neo-Conservatives, the IMF required indebted countries to adopt the Neo-Conservative Agenda in order to secure needed loans.  This resulted in further plunder of their public assets, declines in their infrastructure and economic collapse.

 

One major breakthrough for the Neo-Conservatives was the 1989 adoption of the Washington Consensus by the American Government, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).  This included the opening of borders to foreign trade and capital and the adoption of the Neo-Conservative Agenda.

 

In 1989, the Berlin Wall came down, followed by the collapse of Soviet communism.  But new leaders were unsure of what economic system should be adopted.  Instead of adopting the managed capitalism model which was so successful in western Europe, Poland and then Russia were influenced by the Neo-Conservatives.  Privatization resulted in unregulated corrupt crony capitalism. 

 

I believe that Naomi Klein is wrong when she suggests that China’s leadership was also influenced by the Neo-Conservatives.  After the many shocks of the Maoist period, China’s leaders’ highest priority was to avoid further shocks.  Unlike Poland and Russia, few state enterprises were privatized.  As small private enterprise was encouraged, some entrepreneurs profited greatly and corruption occurred.  But unlike in countries which adopted the Neo-Conservative agenda, little crony capitalism occurred.  China continued to invest enormous sums in its physical and social infrastructure.  Foreign trade and capital were tightly controlled.  China began a politically controlled gradual evolution to becoming a managed capitalist economy.

 

Following Japan’s path, the Asian tigers (Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan and South Korea) were successfully implementing an export oriented economic development strategy.  Behind them came Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia.  But as the latter three opened to foreign trade and capital, they became vulnerable.  They developed foreign trade deficits.  In 1997 (similar to what happened to Mexico in 1994), the ‘Asian Flu’ struck.  Investors removed their money , their currency fell, and the IMF forced the Washington Consensus upon Thailand, Indonesia and South Korea.  Local businesses failed, unemployment and inflation soared.  Their economies were set back.

 

In 2000, Neo-Conservative George Bush became U.S. president.  He used the 9/11 destruction of the twin towers, his invasion and occupation of Iraq and the Katrina Gulf Coast hurricane to implement Neo-Conservative crony capitalism, consisting of fear campaigns, perversion of civil rights, deregulation, privatization, unsupervised no-bid contracts with campaign contributors, substitution of ideologically correct novices for competent personnel.  Billions were drained from the U.S. and Iraqi treasuries for little results.  The U.S. and Iraqi economies were badly damaged.  People died, were injured and forced to become refugees. 

 

The 2005 tsunami produced similar results in Sri Lanka and elsewhere.  Local villagers were inhibited from rebuilding their homes, while plans were made and implemented to turn beach areas into crony-owned tourist attractions. 

 

Since 1980, our U.S. multinational corporations, bankers, government, the IMF and other organizations have supported the implementation of Neo-Conservative agenda.  Including the violence which has often preceded or accompanied it.  They have certainly caused harmed more people more seriously  than have the criminal South American drug organizations.

 

Having read the books listed above, I was aware of many of the events which Naomi Klein describes, including Iran, Guatemala, Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Poland, Russia and the Washington Consensus response to the Asian Flu.  But I had not understood the intervention of the Chicago economists and Neo-Conservatives in all these situations, nor the function that terror played.  The value of a book like The Shock Doctrine is that it portrays an explanation which connects the dots in ways not understood before.  Like most books which present a new paradigm, the author stretches to apply it to situations beyond which it applies.  Malaysia and especially China were able to resist the Neo-Conservatives. 

 

To understand how to inoculate countries against Neo-Conservative crony capitalism, we must understand how some countries have been able to resist it.  Was the Marshall Plan implemented oppositely from the Neo-Conservative vision because the Neo-Conservatives were not yet formed?  Why weren’t the funds used to pressure Europe into deregulating, privatizing, opening their borders to American trade and capital, and to sell their businesses to American ones?  During their post World War II reconstruction, why were Japan and Korea able to avoid crony capitalism in the corrupt forms that resulted from Neo-Conservative activities?  Why have Western European and especially Scandinavian countries resisted the Neo-Colonialists?  How are South American and other countries now recovering from their Neo-Conservative afflictions?

 

The answers to these questions are important, so we can understand how to roll back Neo-Conservative crony-capitalism in the United States and abroad.  Maybe when economic and political conditions deteriorate enough, terror no longer works.  Maybe when the Neo-Conservatives have killed the gooses that laid the golden eggs, even they have less to rob by staying in power?  I hope that Naomi Klein having written a great book about the problem, will write another one about the solution.  Dave Thomas

 

To Revive our Economy, Investment or Consumption

 

When depression threatens, there are two ways to increase demand.  One is to make it easier to consume, by providing tax cuts or making it easier for people to borrow and spend, through easier access to credit with lower interest rates.  The other is to expand investment through government investments in infrastructure or encouraging private investment, especially in the creation and development of new technologies. 

 

Since at least the 1960s, when John Kenneth Galbraith argued that our economy was imbalanced with too much consumption and too little investment (especially public investment), Liberals have argued for more public investment.  Conservatives also say they are for more investment, but their tax cuts encourage consumption, while their budgets cut public investment.  As a result they kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.  Our economy always does better when Democrats control our government, especially consistently Liberal Democrats.

 

George Bush cut taxes and claims that this has helped the economy.  But in spite of heavy government consumption (particularly military spending and corrupt privatization), our economy has been very weak.  John McCain and Republicans want to continue and extend these tax cuts.  Although our government, businesses and households have accumulated record debts, our Federal Reserve lowers interest rates and increases access to loans to increase our debts further.  At some point, this must result in an enormous crash, which may already be developing as a result of the sub-prime loan and credit collapse.

 

What the Democrats must do next year is shift large sums of money from consumption to investment.  Higher taxes on our wealthiest must be restored,  Subsidies to industries which pay record returns to their mostly wealthy stockholders or buy their competitors while not investing must be reduced.  Money must be invested in restoring our physical and social infrastructure.  And in creating and developing new technologies, especially conservation non-carbon based energy production technologies. 

 

For economic fairness, Democrats must also shift from consumption by our wealthiest people to consumption by our less wealthy people.  Through limiting home loan interest deductions, increasing our minimum wage and earned income tax credit, shifting our payroll taxes to a value-added tax, facilitating unionization, encouraging retirement saving and other such programs.

 

Free Choice Act -> Unionization -> Social Benefits

 

On July 28, 2008, SEIU Secretary-Treasurer Anna Burger told their convention:

 

“The Employee Free Choice Act is a simple law that does 3 profound things:

·       It says a majority of workers can decide to have a union

·       Imposes big penalties on employers who violate worker rights, and

·       Gives newly-unionized workers guaranteed first contract through binding arbitration

No government interference. No corporate intimidation. No ridiculous rules and roadblocks set up to block your rights.”

 

“Imagine a world where five years after the Employee Free Choice Act is signed into law, SEIU is organizing a million or more workers a year and the labor movement has added 20 million members to its ranks. Through the Employee Free Choice Act we've built a principled, permanent workers movement that will redefine politics for the next century. Then just imagine what our movement could do:

·       A real living wage for every single worker

·       Healthcare for every child, guaranteed from birth

·       Guaranteed retirement security

·       Quality child care everyone can afford

·       A tax system that rewards work

·       An immigration system that is fair to everyone, everywhere, always

·       Environmental policy that puts our planet and our children first. Forever.”  For more.

 

Here’s the Beef

Could Iran obtain a restraining order in the world court against U.S. and Israeli military threats?

U.S. Navy illegally destroys Puget Sound fish.

Industry now completely dominates the military-industrial complex.

Reducing military spending is necessary; but won’t be easy.

Bush Administration achieves record government deficit this year, not including war expenditures.

For 30 years, deregulation has been bipartisan, leading to corruption, abuse and economic collapse.

Environmental Protection Agency chief Stephen Johnson lied to congress about Whitehouse influence.

To reduce prices for broadband and cable, we need to increase competition.

Our physical infrastructure is not being maintained.  An opportunity to create jobs is being missed.

A large and increasing demand exists for wind farm technicians.

5.3 million (3.7% of all employed) are involuntarily working part time.

Women are still paid less than men for the same work.

600,000 African Americans are infected with HIV.

A new rental approach to foreclosures could help 95% who aren’t helped by recently passed legislation.

Big oil companies are becoming bigger and richer.

High gas prices are reducing demand for exurban houses, producing slower sales, falling prices.  More.

Rising food prices may cause massive starvation in East Africa.  For more.

 

Our Liberal Spirit

 

Fear as a Political Economic Strategy

 

Most of us Americans have not experienced great fear of others.  Unless we have been continually abused (possibly by a family member, companion, false caretaker, boss, or playground bully) or have been stalked by a former companion or law enforcers.  For more.  Some of us experienced this fear, during the McCarthyism of the 1950s, when we might lose our careers and even be jailed if we did not expose others to the same risks.  We have not known the fear of oppressive governments, which may capture, torture, kill and disappear us and our loved ones. 

 

This is the fear that Naomi Klein describes as preceding or accompanying many of the attempts to implement the Neo-Conservative agenda.  Capture, torture and killing is done openly to frighten others into submission.  With such fear, we are less likely to be concerned with changes in the economic rules which produce crony capitalism with greater economic inequality, less safety net, and declines in economic production.

 

One can only wonder what we would do under such circumstances.  Would we resist such power at tremendous risk with little chance of success?  If captured, would we under pressure betray our ideals and acquaintances?  It is like asking, if we were caught by hostiles in a box canyon, would we die with arrows in our back or our chest.  While none of us can be sure of what we would do in a foxhole under fire, thinking about it may guide the way we judge others.   

 

Recommended Books – See our list of books for Liberals

Naomi Klein, 2007, The Shock Doctrine, The Rise of Disaster Capitalism

 

 

 

 

Free Member Advertising

 

Hire Our Lake Hills Neighbors

·       Auto Repair, price varies depending on job (but always fair), Jaime Speicher (AAS Auto Repair Technician) (425-746-2353)

·       Babysitting for infants (occasional evenings and weekends) - $5 per hour- Christy Pacheco- johnpacheco01@yahoo.com  425-653-3565

·       Data Entry- $10 per 12 font, double spaced page- Christy Pacheco (425-653-3565 johnpacheco01@yahoo.com)

·       Debt Elimination Counseling, Seminars and Workshops – price negotiable – Sherry Brandt (206-356-8034, somerev2@comcast.net)

·       Home Repair- prices vary, depending on job- John Pacheco 425-653-3565 johnpacheco01@yahoo.com)

·       Home Repair and Remodeling, Rick Hegdahl (206-227-6280  vikingnw@comcast.net)

·       Housekeeper, price negotiable – Laura Montano (641-5038 ambar_lau@hotmail.com)

·       Life Support Therapies, Astara Burlingame RN. (MD) holistic care, acupuncture hypno therapy, biological medicines (206-370-0356)

·       Private Piano Lessons (students must have a piano), afternoons - Anna Khosrowian (378-7938), price negotiable

·       Psychotherapist, accepts insurance -  Sandy Mathews (462-7889, www.sandramathews.com)

 

About Puget Sound Liberals

 

In October, 2005, we founded our Lake Hills Liberals as an experimental demonstration of creating neighborhoods where liberals thrive and multiply and maximizing our vote for Liberal candidates.  In January, 2006, we began our newsletter.

 

During our first year, we focused upon Lake Hills neighborhood development, experimenting with a variety of activities and events.  To elect Liberals, we canvassed our 12 precincts to increase the number of identified likely Democratic voters from 33% to 90% and stimulated them to vote, which assisted election of our 2006 Democratic candidates. We recruited 30% (500) of them.  We encouraged house parties to allow neighbors to meet each other to be able to prevent crime, to assist each other in a disaster, and to protect and assist our children.  We created our website.  We began a monthly discussion group, called the Lake Hills Liberal Salon.

 

During our second year, we recruited many members from throughout our Puget Sound and beyond.  We changed our name to Puget Sound Liberals.  Using our newsletter and website, we continued to focus upon educating our members about our Liberal values, history, priorities, policies and political strategies.  We enabled Puget Sound Liberals to more easily identify, communicate, associate and cooperate with each other.  Our political priority was promotion of Public Campaign Financing. 

 

As we begin our third year, we continue our past activities, especially electing Liberals, canvassing Lake Hills, promoting house parties, educating and enabling cooperation among Liberals, and promoting Public Campaign Financing.  Our new political priority is promoting a fair Washington tax system which produces enough revenue to provide all of our residents access to quality health, education and other public services.  We need a progressive income tax to substitute for part of our existing excise, property and sales taxes and supplement them.

 

To get our free services, including our newsletter, our ‘Proud Liberal, Time for a Change’ yard signs or ‘Proud Liberal’ bumper stickers, volunteer or make a donation, contact Dave Thomas.    Please help your liberal friends to become well informed, by inviting them to receive our newsletter.  Just send us their name, email address, and residence (community, zip code and legislative district.) 

 

Our weekly newsletter is currently distributed to 2300 members by email each Friday.  Submit your news to Editor Dave Thomas.  We are seeking reporter-reviewer-editors with knowledge of particular political groups and issues.   We have asked the following experts to help us.

 


·       African Americans – Rob Holland

·       Blogs – Brian Moran

·       Campaign Finance – Sarajane Siegfriedt

·       Democratic Party – Jeff Smith

·       Drug Policy – Roger Goodman

·       Education – Dennis Gerlitz, John Stokes

·       Environment – Forest Gower

·       Gays and Lesbians – Jack Greenlaw

·       Green Party – Trey Smith

·       Health Care – Larry Kalb, Bob Fithian

·       Hispanics – needed

·       Immigration - Grosvenor Anschell

·       Housing and Poverty – Sarajane Siegfriedt

·       Labor Unions – Nancy Rising

·       Law and Justice – Bill Sherman, Keith Scully

·       State Legislation – Sarajane Siegfriedt

·       Veterans – Rick Hegdahl

·       Women’s Issues – Catherine Minch


 

Additional Resources

See our website at www.PugetSoundLiberals.org, with our basic training about being Liberal, our archive of all past newsletters, resources for liberals, tools for Democratic legislative district organizations  and more.  To learn about particular issues, further your interests and meet colleagues, visit websites of advocacy and caring organizations.  Also see our list of helpful websites.  Craig’s List Seattle

 

See Center for Progressive Action for archive of well researched daily news.  See Alternet and Common Dreams for archived liberal commentaries.   Read Real Clear Politics and Ashville Global Report.  Subscribe to Liberal Opinion for many more.  Also visit Nygaard Notes.  Open Left.

 

For news about NW sustainability, visit Sightline Daily.  We recommend the Pacific NW Portal for displaying many blogs through which Northwest Liberals exchange their knowledge and opinions.  See also Lefty Blogs.  We recommend you go to Washblog to find blogs containing information and opinions about Washington issues and activities, with fewer emotional outbursts than many other blogs. 

 

Learn about our State Democratic Party.   About 2008 Caucuses and Elections.  Contact your national and state officials.  Report Card on your congress member  For many Congressional Report Cards.