Puget Sound Liberals Weekly Newsletter #165

Enhancing Freedom, Opportunity and Cooperation in Puget Sound and Beyond

Through informing and networking Liberals and Liberal Organizations.

 

Our vision is hundreds of thousands of well-informed Puget Sound Liberals working together.

 

       3000 members                                 March 13, 2009                     formerly Lake Hills Liberals                

 

 

 

 

                                                     

Our Website                                   Our  Editor                  To Unsubscribe

 

              Table of Contents       * Featured Articles

 

About Puget Sound Liberals

Calendars of Events

Communication With Our Members

Opportunities

Petitions

 

Commentaries from Our Members

Henry Stanford: Seattle PI Supports Income Tax*

John Burbank & Others: Income Tax Needed*

Donald Smith: Democrats Should Discuss Taxes

David Spring: Support the Fair School Funding Act

Ray McBain: Public, Not Private, Health Insurance

Rich Austin: Blue Dogs Should Support President

Maryrose Asher: Supreme Court & Illegal Detention

 

Liberals and Democrats Links to the Beef

Obama Watch - Week 7*

Earmark Reform

Dave Thomas: I Wanted President Bush to Fail

Public Campaign Financing Will Assist Health Reform.

Cut Military Budget to Fund other Needs.

 

State and Local Links to the Beef

A Proposed Initiative for Adequate and Fair Taxes*

Geoff Cole: How to a Promote State Income Tax*

Featured Advocacy Group: Economic Policy Institute*

State Action for the Unemployed

My Legislative District Planning Workshop*

 

Nation and World Links to the Beef

Comparing Our Present Recession with the 1930s

Bush Lowered their Taxes, then their Wealth

We Must Stop Abusive Business Behavior.

 

Our Liberal Spirit

Courage Is Tough.  So Is Denial. *

 

Recommended Books

 

 

Our Political Values

 

Our Political Priorities

 

·       Fair Clean Elections and Open Government

·       Fair Taxes and Competent Spending

·       Investment for Productivity

·       Quality Health, Education, Jobs, Income

·       Environmental Protection and Energy Independence

·       Security and Equal Rights

·       Justice and Peace Everywhere

·       International Cooperation and Leadership

 

Conservatives oppose all of these

 

     Let’s End Our National Nightmare

 

         Let’s Restore Our American Dream

 

More on Conservative opposition to our American Dream

 

Washington State’s 5 Major Needs

·       Federal Funding for Health and Education

·       Stop Corporate Abuse

·       Public Campaign Financing

·       Substitute a Progressive Income Tax

·       Replacing Conservative Legislators

 

Quote of the Week

Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices, but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence and fulfills the duty to express the results of his thought in clear form.   Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Communication with Our Members

 

My priorities include:

·         Changing our Borrow, Consume and Speculate Economy to an Earn, Conserve and Speculate economy.

·         Increasing state revenue and lowering most people’s taxes by substituting an income tax for some of our sales, excise and property taxes.

·         Grassnet organizing, including identifying Liberal voters, facilitating communication and association among them, and educating them about our political values, history, situation, priorities, proposals and strategies.  This includes strengthening our Democratic Legislative District Organizations.

 

Each week, I intend to feature an advocacy organization as I have done with our Economic Opportunity Institute for the last 4 weeks.  This week, I feature the affiliated Economic Policy Institute.

 

 

Calendars of Events                             

 

King County Democrats - LD Meetings            Some 2008 Legislature Lobby Days

Thurston County Progressive Net                  Western Washington Fellowship of Reconciliation

Alliance for Democracy                                Democratic Underground.Com                          

Sierra Club Cascade Chapter Calendar           Cool State Washington

Washington Public Campaigns Calendar          Town Hall Seattle Calendar

Washington State Labor Council                    Whatcom County Peace and Justice Calendar 

Conversation Cafe      Drinking Liberally          Seattle NOW          

Wallingford Neighbors for Peace and Justice – Friday Night Movies      Liberal films on PBS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Calendar of Events

Saturday, March 14 at 6 PM at Twist (2313 – 1st Avenue in Belltown, Seattle) – Vote Clean Seattle Campaign Kickoff Dinner, with Congressman Jim McDermott.  Sponsored by Washington Public Campaigns

Saturday, March 14 at 6 PM at Seattle Center Fisher Pavilion – Futurewise Carnaval Dinner and Fundraiser, including live and silent auctions.  $85.  RSVP by March 6th.

Saturday, March 21 at 10 AM – 5 PM at Hal Holmes Community Center (209 Ruby Street, Ellensburg) – Washington Progressive Caucus.  RSVP.

Friday, April 24 (3-9 PM); Saturday, April 25 (9 AM-6 PM); and Sunday, April 26 (9 AM – 3:30 PM) at SeattleCamp Wellstone training for citizen activists, campaign workers and candidates.  $50 - $200.  To register.

 

Opportunities and Petitions

Useful Websites: contacts, maps, community organizing tools, and more.

Access to jillions of political cartoons.

Download Sightline Institute’s climate policy primer ‘Cap and Trade 101’.  About Sightline.

Obtain Progressive States Networks resources for improving many state government services.

 

Petitions

Tell congress to establish a truth and reconciliation commission to investigate Bush Administration.

Thank your Washington Senators for co-sponsoring the Employee Free Choice Act.

Thank Interior Secretary Ken Salazar for canceling oil and gas leases in Utah wilderness.

Tell our senators to vote for mortgage relief, unencumbered by banking lobbyist restrictions.

Tell our congress members to support child friendly components of President Obama’s budget.

Tell your congress members to stop subsidies and tax loopholes for oil and gas companies.

Tell the EPA to grant California the authority to restrict auto emissions.

Thank President Obama for repealing President Bush’s executive order on stem cell research.

Tell our Health and Social Services Dept. to restore women’s rights to complete sexual information.

Tell our congress members to stop border patrol agents from setting up checkpoints not at our border.

 

Commentaries From Our Members

 

Henry Stanford: Thanks for Seattle PI’s Support for State Income Tax

Published by Seattle PI on 3/6/2009

 

Congratulations to the P-I for your editorial "Flawed tax system," (Tuesday), in which you advocate a progressive income tax for our state. It has always been a mystery to me why a left-leaning editorial board, of a left-leaning newspaper, published in a very liberal city in one of the most liberal states in the nation would take so long to editorialize in favor of a progressive state income tax. I can understand why Democratic Party legislators might have qualms, fearing that open advocacy could cost them their seats a the next election, and I would never ask a legislator, Democratic or Republican, to commit suicide. But editorial writers enjoy no such luxury, as it is their job to hold politicians' feet to the fire. Unless, of course, they would rather be mere shills for the Democrats.  Henry King Stanford

 

John Burbank & Others: ‘High Incomes Tax’ Needed

Published by Seattle PI on 3/10/2009     Sightline Daily also directed readers to this commentary.

 

We applaud the long history, investigative journalism, and incisive and wise editorial work of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Even in the face of its impending closure, the P-I continues to be a central voice for improving our society and pointing out the pathway we need to take.

 

Next month we presume we will not be receiving the P-I at our doorsteps, but we must proceed with the public policy for which the P-I has been a courageous voice. That policy centers on the intertwined strategies of remaking our upside-down tax system and fully funding education, from pre-kindergarten to K-12 to the community college and four-year higher educational system. If we succeed in these efforts, we will lay the foundation for the advancement of our state, our economy and our citizens in the 21st century. If we fail, we will be left behind.

 

We have the most regressive tax regime in the country. Middle-class and low-income families pay much more in taxes proportionally than the wealthy. Absent an income tax, our over-reliance on the sales tax and property tax also results in insufficient public revenues to fund the public services, especially education, that 21st century Washington citizens deserve and demand.

 

That's why funding per pupil has now dropped below 88 percent of the national average for our K-12 students.  It's why we are 46th of the 50 states in our student-teacher ratios in public school. It's why out of every 100 ninth graders, only 69 receive their high school diploma on time. It's why we fail to provide high-quality pre-kindergarten for the vast majority of Washington's young children. It's why 29 states are ahead of us in funding for higher education academic research. It's why public college tuition has tripled in the past 30 years, while proportional state appropriations have shrunk. At the University of Washington, the state has reduced its responsibility to less than half of tuition costs, offloading more expenses to middle-class and low-income families.

 

Even in the midst of this recession, there is a solution to this public failure. A group of citizens is coming together to promote a "high incomes" income tax. It would be offset with an across-the-board cut of the state property tax. The new net revenue would be dedicated to public education.

 

The vast majority of middle-class families would get a tax cut, the highest income families would pay an added tax (which they would get to deduct from their federal income taxes), and the children and students of our state would get a boost in the billions of dollars for their education and future well being, prosperity, and productivity. We anticipate a multi-year educational campaign to achieve this vision for our future.

 

Can we realize this in our state? The better question is why not. After all, we in King County live in the fourth wealthiest county per capita in the country. We have no excuse to prevent us from reforming our tax system to provide for high quality education for all of our children. That's the American way. And it is a fitting legacy for the leadership, the citizenship, and the vision of the P-I.

 

Authors of this column are Bill Gates Sr., Aubrey Davis, Marilyn Watkins, Phyllis Lamphere and John Burbank. Inquiries can be directed to John Burbank, executive director, Economic Opportunity Institute

 

Some prominent civic leaders have come forward to champion substituting a progressive income tax for some of our regressive property tax.  Now we need our educational associations; labor unions; PTA; children’s, social service and poverty advocacy organizations to join them, since they have the most to lose if we stick with our present unfair tax system which brings in too little revenue to maintain necessary educational and social services.  Only with leadership from a broad coalition of civic groups can our legislators take the political risk of supporting tax reform which includes an income tax.  Without such a broad coalition, our various advocacy groups will continue competing with each other for inadequate revenues.  For example, leaders of education groups are calling for increased funding, without suggesting how the funding will be obtained.  Noticeably absent from this struggle are the Liberal bloggers.  Nor are grassroots Democrats speaking out.  

 

To see all of my last year’s weekly commentaries (in one document) on the history of our tax system, previous attempts to reform it, our present system, what’s wrong, what’s needed and how to get it. Dave Thomas

 

Donald Smith: Democrats Should Discuss Tax Increases

 

Democrats in Olympia are acting like DINO: Democrats in Name Only. They are afraid even to discuss raising taxes, even though the current regressive tax system benefits the well-to-do and unfairly burdens the lower and middle classes.

 

Thank you, P-I, for being willing to challenge conservative talking points about "tax relief," "protecting citizens from high taxes" and "government waste."  Alas, on so many issues the Democrats are afraid to stand up for what's right and instead allow the right-wingers to control the terms of debate.  Donald Smith

 

David Spring: 7 Reasons to Support the Fair School Funding Act

 

The proposed Fair School Funding Act would place a referendum before the voters to lift the current exemption of intangible property (stocks and bonds) from the State property tax. Closing this tax loophole for the rich offers the following advantages:

  1. It would raise 2 billion additional dollars per year for our public schools.        In 1980, we were 11th in the nation in school funding. Today we are 45th in the nation. This Act would restore our school funding to the national average.
  2. It would create a fairer tax structure by specifically targeting the wealth of those in our State who currently do not pay their fair share of State taxes. Currently our middle class pays some of the highest State taxes in the nation (more than 12% of their income) while millionaires in our State pay some of the lowest State taxes in the nation (less than 3% of income). This Act would raise the amount paid by millionaires to about 4%. As the first $200,000 of intangible property and all retirement accounts would be exempt, this Act would only raise taxes on the wealthiest 5% of State residents. 95% of State residents would see either a reduction in their State taxes or no change in their State taxes.
  3. It would greatly reduce the projected 8 billion dollar shortfall in the State budget. Federal stimulus funds will temporarily cushion the blow of drastic reductions in State funding due to the national recession. However, we need a long term solution to the problem.
  4. It would diversify and stabilize our State’s tax structure. Currently, more than 70 percent of the money the state collects comes from sales and business-and-occupation taxes. No other State is so heavily dependent on sales transactions. It is unwise to have such an unbalanced tax structure because whenever there is a sudden fall off it economic activity, our public schools are placed at risk. Wealth is much less dependent on economic activity. This Act would thus help stabilize our tax base in times of economic recession.
  5. It would end the current preferential treatment of stocks and bonds over home ownership. For some crazy reason, we currently exempt stocks and bonds from property taxes. Thus, if a person puts $300,000 into a home it is taxed. But if a person puts $300,000 into stocks and bonds it is not taxed. If we eliminated the exemption of intangible property, we could stabilize home values and reduce stock speculation.
  6. Over time, it would help reduce the current disparity between the wealth of the super-rich and the wealth of our middle class. In the 1970’s, the richest one percent owned 10% of our nation’s wealth. After the Reagan revolution of the 1980’s, the richest one percent owned 18% of the wealth. Since 2000, after 8 years of tax cuts for the super rich and deregulation of the super rich, they now own 40% of our national wealth. The last time there was this big a disparity between the assets of the super rich and the assets of the middle class was 1929 at the beginning of the great depression. This extremely unfair distribution of wealth leads to a feudal society of rich and poor which is very unhealthy to our  social structure and a contributing factor to our current economic crisis.
  7. It would likely be passed by the voters. The voters know that our current tax system is unfair to our middle class. They also know it is inadequate in that it results in our having some of the most over-crowded schools in America. They understand that with an 8 billion dollar shortfall, we can no longer afford to give the richest one percent a free ride while our children get the shaft.

 

The Best Time for Education Funding Reform is Right Now!

If there is a lesson to be learned from the failure of Education Reform bills in the 2009 Legislative session, it is that funding has to come before educational reforms will be passed.  Both of the competing Education Reform bills failed because neither provided any source of funding to pay for the reforms in the bills. Instead, both proposed more committees to continue to study the problem of where the money will come from. Both bills were essentially a series of empty promises and unfunded mandates. We can and must do better than this. We do not need more studies. We need action.

 

There are only a few options for raising billions of dollars. These include raising sales taxes, raising business taxes, raising property taxes and/or raising income taxes.

The problem with these options is that they would all raise taxes on our middle class. But our middle class is already being taxed to death. According to Lisa Brown: “Any new tax package must not place that burden on people who are already paying too much in our unfair tax system." A better solution is to approve tax reform targeted specifically at millionaires and specifically at creating a fairer and more uniform State tax structure.   The Fair School Funding Act would tax intangible property at essentially the same rate as tangible property and thereby close a loophole currently used by millionaires to avoid paying their fair share of State taxes. We simply can no longer afford to give millionaires a free ride while our children get the shaft.

 

Barack Obama recently said “Times of crisis are also opportunities for change.” We are now facing an 8 billion dollar budget shortfall over the next two and a half years (about 3 billion per year). So we certainly have a crisis. The question is whether we will use this financial crisis as an opportunity for change.

 

“Rather than focus on dividing a smaller pie, lawmakers should be asking themselves how to fund the whole pie so citizens don't loose service. You have to look at the tax breaks for the wealthy and say, "It's time to eliminate those tax breaks.'"  Steve Hoffman, Washington Federation of State Employees (WFSE) February 16, 2009

 

Those who want to protect State tax breaks for millionaires claim that all we really need to do is cut down on State spending. But we have one of the top 20 economies in America, yet we are 37th in the nation in State taxes as a percent of income.  We do not have an out of control spending problem, we have an out of control “tax breaks for the super rich” problem. Opponents of Fair Taxes also claim that if we taxed stocks and bonds, rich people would simply move their intangible assets out of State. This is not likely for three reasons. First, most wealthy citizens want to pay their fair share of State taxes and support their public schools. Second, the tax is very low. Transaction fees alone might be greater than just paying the tax. Third, any State taxes paid could be deducted from federal taxes. So the tax burden is just being transferred from the federal to the State tax rolls.  Thus, there would be little reason for the wealthy to try to evade paying their fair share of State taxes.

 

We have a choice: Either we require millionaires to start paying their fair share of State taxes NOW ….Or by next year our public schools will be facing a billion dollars in cuts.

If you want education reform, ask your legislators to end tax breaks for millionaires and support the Fair School Funding Act. No more excuses. No more delays.

Now is the time to adopt a fairer tax system which would provide fair school funding.                   

 

For a copy of the complete text of the proposed Fair School Funding Act, and/or to help in the campaign to get fair school funding passed, email me at wildernessspring@aol.com  David Spring

 

Ray McBain: Public, Not Private, Health Insurance

 

I support Obama in this effort, but I would be happier if he would pursue a plan that provides health care for all Americans regardless of income. That for sure will involve either the single-payer health plan (HR 676) or a plan funded by public insurance (whatever that is).

 

Too much compromise may not lead to a plan at all. However, I feel sure Obama is dedicated to some sort of plan like the above. We must not allow the insurance companies to deter us from a successful plan.  Ray McBain

 

Rich Austin: Blue Dog Democrats Should Support President

 

I want to echo the words in the two statements by Ray McBain. (Newsletter #164).

 

I would only add this cause for concern:  We voted for a Democrat for President. “Blue Dog Democrats” were nowhere to be found on the ballot.  It is outrageous that some Blue Dogs are now joining forces with Congressional Republicans and making lots of noise over what are essentially penny-ante issues.  Blue Dogs didn’t have the guts to flex their muscles while Bush was ruining our economy, but now they are spouting-off?  No way!  They need to be told to come back home! 

 

Ever since some Democratic lawmakers began supporting Bush’s anti-Main Street policies I stopped giving money to the Democratic Party.  I am afraid as much as one cent of my donation might wind up in the coffers of so-called Democrats who are now aiding and abetting the enemy of President Obama’s policies.  Now I just give to individual Democratic] candidates.  Please convey my message to your Democratic colleagues.

 

America voted for change!  America did not vote for fair-weather friends.  America voted for Obama and for the policies he articulated over the course of a two-year campaign.  As Ray so succinctly put it: “Obama...your programs are, although not perfect, so much better than those of the past 30 years.”  Keep up the good work! And senators, keep on helping the current administration to continue making gains that benefit the working class”.  Rich Austin

 

Liberals and Democrats

 

Obama Watch – Week 7

Also go to Whitehouse.gov.

 

Two Approaches to Health Care Reform: One or Two Steps

Unlike the 1993 attempt to reform health care, President Obama initiated his attempt with a White House Conference on Health Care Reform which included a wide variety of stake-holders (insurers, employers, providers, consumers and legislators and others, although few advocates of a single-payer (Medicare type) system).  For more.  More.  More.  More.  Our media is also ignoring single payer alternatives.  For more.

 

Instead of presenting any specific proposals, Obama indicated that reform could include all private or all public coverage or some combination, but must meet three criteria:

1.      everyone has access

2.      to high quality health care

3.      with cost controls

All of the participants apparently agreed that reform now is necessary (although they could change their minds if the reforms that are considered don’t meet their approval). 

 

One approach would be to attempt to adopt a single payer health system now, even though stiff opposition from private insurers would result.  Many advocates of health care reform and a majority of our American people believe that only a single payer system (used by all other countries with national health care coverage) can be affordable.  For more.  We believe that allowing private insurance invariably increases costs due to assessing who qualifies for what.  And reduces coverage due to motivations to disqualify people.  The result is that not everyone is covered, quality of health care suffers, and it is expensive.  This is proven by our present system and the failure of the Massachusetts system.

 

President Obama is pursuing a second approach which reduces resistance through allowing participation of private insurers.  Once the new system is adopted to enable coverage for everyone, the costs of including private insurance will become apparent, especially is there is a public coverage option.  It will then be possible to proceed to a single payer system.  For more.  But private insurers are objecting to having to compete with a public insurance option.  For more.  For more.

 

For more.  For more.  For more.  For more.

 

Flexible Foreign Policy

Hillary Clinton is continuing her travels to visit foreign leaders, see better relations and explore new joint initiatives.  Our Obama administration is opening up more foreign policy options.

 

Science and Stem Cell Research

Declaring that science, not ideology will guide his administration, President Obama allows scientists who use newer stem cell lines to apply for federal funding.  For more.  For more.  President Obama repudiates president Bush’s signing statements.

 

Increased Support for Quality Education

Through his stimulus package and 2010 budge, President Obama is doubling the money for education compared to President Bush’s budget.  To make our students more competitive with students in other countries, money is increased for early childhood education, for encouraging students to graduate from high school and to ease their entrance into college.  Particular attention is given to high poverty hard-to-staff schools.  

 

The money is contingent upon schools rewarding excellent teachers and assisting or replacing poor ones.  Merit will be measured in various ways including certification and student achievement, to be decided through consultation with parents and teachers.  Obama also supports charter schools as laboratories for innovation.  Educational associations worry about merit pay and charter schools, but appreciate that they will participate in defining merit.  For more.  For more.

 

Promoting Unionization

House Democrats introduced the Employee Free Choice Act, a vitally important package of protections that would help restore working people's much-denuded right to join a union if they so desire.  There's nothing more terrifying to corporate America than the prospect of dealing with its workforce on an even playing field, and, along with its allies in Congress, it's pulling out all the stops to keep that from happening.   For more.

 

 

Limiting Compensation of Executives of Bailed-Out Companies

President Obama has proposed limiting their compensation to $500,000, which is 25% more than he receives.  Median U.S. household income in 2007 was $50,233.  Only 5% of households had incomes of more than $177,000.  If your income is $500,000 you are rich.  CEOs of our nation’s 500 largest companies averaged $12.8 million.  They are very, very rich.  Top 20 private equity and hedge fund managers averaged $657 million.  They are insanely rich.  For more.  For more.  For more.

 

If all these ‘best and brightest’ financial company executives (who played key roles in destroying our economy) quit instead of serving for $500,000, we might be better off.

 

2009 Budget Bill Passed

President Obama will sign 2009 budget legislation (for 9 remaining appropriation bills), which includes significant increases for food aid and housing vouchers for our poor, energy research and other programs.  It has earmarks, but only half as many as previous bills, 60% from Democrats and 40% from Republicans.  For more.

 

Special Interests Ready to Fight

Businesses in many industries are mobilizing to resist regulations, tax increases, cuts in their subsidies.  For more.

 

Dave Thomas: I Wanted President Bush to Fail

 

In 2000, I wanted George Bush to fail to become president.  I wanted him to fail to:

·         Pass income tax cuts which contributed to our economic mess.

·         Allow ideology to supplant science as a basis for public policy

·         Use his administration’s failure to stop the 9/11 attacks to unconstitutionally increase his power.

·         To divide our country, without calling for shared sacrifices for our public good

·         Pass a ‘No Child Left Behind’ law which punishes schools and students which need help.

·         Invade and occupy Iraq

·         Pass a medicine supplement to Medicare which rewards private insurers and pharmaceutical companies at enormous expense to our government and seniors

·         Be re-elected president in 2004.

·         Wreck FEMA such that an inadequate response was made to Katrina

·         Provide unsupervised no-bid contracts to cronies

And much more.

 

I want President Obama to succeed, because I agree with his values, objectives and careful strategies.  I worry about a few of his apparent choices, but believe his approach may be self-correcting.  Just as I wanted President Bush’s actions listed above to fail, I can understand why Conservatives want President Obama to fail.  I am concerned with our public welfare.  Conservatives are concerned with the welfare of their cronies.  Dave Thomas

 

Earmark Reform

 

As always, Arizona Senator John McCain is protesting earmarks in the 2008 budget legislation, which includes half as many earmarks as earlier legislation, which are transparent as to content and authorship, and which are divided about 60/40 between Democrats and Republicans.  Authors defend them as often the best way to quickly fund worthwhile projects.  But abuses occur when earmarks reward campaign contributors, sometimes making federal agencies buy from them products and services that the agencies don’t want.

 

How about establishing an annual monetary limit for each Senator and Representative, which gives each of them the right to make transparent earmarks, totaling no more than the limit?  In addition, none of these earmarks should be allowed to benefit any private campaign contributor.

 

Public Campaign Financing Will Assist Health Care and other Reforms.

 

The reason that we don’t have more social safety net programs like Europe does isn’t because our people have different values.  It’s because Europe doesn’t regard corporations as people.  And allow them to lobby to prevent social safety net programs.  If we legislated that corporations aren’t people, or as least barred private campaign financing, we could expand our safety net.  For more.

 

Cutting the Wasteful Military Budget Will Provide Funds for other Needs

For more.

 

The Elephant Sitting on the Economy
While the United States economy falters, a variety of ideas to secure workers and businesses have been put forward. Yet, the issue of the U.S. military, specifically missile defense spending, has received very little attention as a government sector ripe for spending reform.

 

Budget Priorities and Energy Security
No Blood for Oil: a common refrain in the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq.  Our foreign policy throughout the Middle East is focused on securing the resources to feed our national dependence on oil. The U.S. can no longer justify our over-consumption of fossil fuels - the cost is too high. In order to correct our energy policies we must reform our budget priorities.

 

Swords or Ploughshares:  Empowering Smart Decisions in Difficult Times
After World War Two there was a dramatic shift in our national economy.  That war was, and continues to be, trumpeted as the way out of the Great Depression.  Since then our country has maintained an ever increasing level of military spending as a means of 'stimulating our economy.'  After a generation of considering illogical and unnecessary military spending essential to our economic growth, it is no wonder in 2009 the Pentagon budget dwarfs the budgets of many small industrialized countries.

 

More Fuzzy Math?

President Obama made it clear during his campaign for the Presidency that the Pentagon was not immune to the economic crisis; alluding that major cuts to the military budget were in the works.  At the same time he committed to increasing the personnel size of the Army and Marines; continuing the U.S. military presence in Iraq with residual combat forces; and, increasing the military presence in Afghanistan and Pakistan. 

 

Here’s the Beef

Al From retires from Democratic Leadership Council, proud of what DLC has accomplished.

Various Obama initiatives support income equality.

President Obama supports rail and transit improvements.

President Obama should direct congress to approve international women’s rights initiatives.

More than cradle-to-grave security, Obama supports cradle-to-grave opportunity.

The good news is that politicians accept the bad news and the need to act.

Conservative ideology makes South Carolina’s economy among worst in our nation.

Republicans can’t object to Rush Limbaugh.  Many of their constituents are dittoheads.  More.  More.

Young evangelicals are more tolerant and compassionate than older evangelicals have been.

 

State and Local

 

See Diane and Ted Sanford’s proposal for an income come tax initiative.

 

Geoff Cole: How to a Promote State Income Tax

Published by Seattle PI on 3/6/2009

 

Thanks for your courageous editorial in support of a state income tax.

 

You mentioned but didn't emphasize the three criteria that must be present to "sell" a state income tax to Washington voters. If these three criteria are met, I believe a majority of Washingtonians will support a state income tax. The three essentials are:

1.      It must replace or reduce an existing regressive tax, not be an "add-on" to the existing tax structure. The obvious place to start is the exceedingly regressive state sales tax.

2.      It must be graduated, the percentage of burden rising with income level, so that middle- and lower-income taxpayers ultimately pay less in total taxes than they are paying now.

3.     It must be accompanied by a vigorous educational initiative, explaining in clear and simple language how it will reduce the overall tax burden on middle and lower incomes. It should include "case study" examples, in terms of dollars saved, of how individuals and families at various income levels will benefit from lower overall state taxes in the long run.  Geoff Cole

 

Featured Advocacy Group ---- Economic Policy Institute -------------------------

 

I obtained several reports by the Economic Policy Institute, when visiting our Economic Opportunity Institute: Grading Places.  What Do the Business Climate Rankings Really Tell Us? and A Plan to Revive the American Economy.  The first report examines 5 so-called indexes of competitiveness, showing that they are incompatible with each other, fail to predict economic growth, because they are oriented to promotion of Conservative legislation: low taxes, spending cuts and less regulation. 

 

Businesses considering whether to stay or come to a state consider a much larger set of factors, including labor costs, energy costs, transportation, educational attainment, school quality and health care, cultural and recreational amenities, and climate.  Note that many of these factors require active state government support.

 

The second report notes that following World War II, our U.S. economy grew at a solid pace with the resulting prosperity broadly shared, providing security and comfort to most workers (with the exception of ethnic minorities.  Beginning in the 1970s, Conservative policies increasingly broke the link between economic growth and improved standards of living. 

 

To restore the American dream of broadly shared prosperity and opportunities for upward mobility, the report recommends:

·         Increasing financial security through creating universal access to quality health care, protecting social security benefits and creating new guaranteed retirement accounts.

·         Increasing worker’s wages through job training, full employment, adequate minimum wages and earned income tax credits, facilitating unionization, and protecting workers from abusive work conditions.

·         Increasing our economic efficiency through investing in conservation and our physical and social infrastructure.

·         Providing health, education, employment, pay, entrepreneurship and home ownership opportunities to all ethnic groups and immigrants and providing flexible work arrangements consistent with fulfilling family responsibilities.

·         Reshaping globalization to promote quality U.S. jobs and fair competition with other countries, which protects our environment, consumers, workers and general public from corporate abuse.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Progressive State Network: State Action for the Unemployed

 

On Thursday, the official national unemployment rate climbed to 8.1% nationwide as employers shed an additional 651,00 workers last month.  Add in sharp rises in the number of involuntary part-time and long-time discouraged workers, and the unemployment rate rose to 14.8%.

While long-term job growth is the goal of the recovery package, states need to, and some are already stepping up to, address the immediate needs of the unemployed.  There are a range of additional resources outlined in Progressive State Network's Implementing the Recovery Plan: A Resource Guide for State Legislators and Advocates.

 

My Democratic Legislative District Organization Planning Workshop

 

I recently conducted a planning workshop for a Democratic Legislative District Organization.  12 leaders met for 3 hours, to eat and visit and spend 2 hours and 15 minutes planning.  Leaders shared their fall 2010 political vision for the Legislative District and the obstacles to this vision.  They then shared their fall 2010 vision for their LD organization and the obstacles to this vision.

 

They then created strategies to deal with these obstacles and developed a calendar of projects.  The calendar was a 2009 timeline with a row for each of five action teams: (1) Grassroots Organizing; (2) Membership, Recruitment and training; (3) Communication and Training: Website, Newsletter, Online portals; (4) Fundraising; and (5) Outreach and Candidates.  Included in the Calendar were 30 projects to be done, with each inserted according to who would do it (row) and when (column).  The action teams will recruit more members, refine their projects and implement them. 

I will be glad to lead similar workshops for other Democratic Legislative District Organizations.   Dave Thomas

 

Here’s the Beef

Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown argues for more flexible encouragement of renewable energy.

Washington should increase percentage holding college degrees from 39 to 60%.  For more.

When schools fail, their students may end up in prison.

Seattle PI may offer an online only version of its newspaper.

Washington credit unions are doing fine.  They loaned 9.6% more money in 2008 than in 2007.

Why isn’t Republican Attorney General Rob McKenna prosecuting any loan fraud?  For more.

 

Nation and World  

 

Comparing Our Present Recession with the 1930s Depression

 

Beginning in 1933, Roosevelt borrowed to create jobs which reduced unemployment.  In 1936, he reduced the deficit by spending less to create jobs, resulting in increased unemployment.  In 1942 – 1945, our World War II expenditures employed millions in our military industrial complex.  When the public spending declined in 1946, households had little debt and large savings.  Private spending fueled the economy.  Public debt declined as a proportion of national production.  High earnings resulting from low unemployment and unionization stimulated the economy until the oil shock-driven stagflation of the 1970s, the Volker recession of the early 1980s, President Reagan’s attack on unionization and foreign competition.

 

Unlike the 1930s, we have social security and other stabilizers which have not allowed our unemployment to climb so high.  Unlike 1946, we have much less public debt as a portion of our production, but we have much more private debt.  If our government would pay off all of our private debt, we would be in a situation similar to 1946.  But this won’t happen, since it would reward the most profligate among us.  So we need to depend upon public instead of private investment.

 

As our households reduce their private debt, we will begin to spend more, although less than during our recent bubbles.  In the meantime, we need public investment to increase employment, much of it private employment.  And we need to return to workers earning fair wages.  And we need regulations and tax policies to restrict speculation and to promote conservation instead of consumption.

 

President Bush Lowered their Taxes, then their Wealth

 

President Bush lowered the taxes of our rich.  Through this, deregulation, lack of enforcement, he wrecked our economy, costing them more of their wealth than they gained through paying less tax. 

 

Last year, the number of billionaires fell from 1,125 to 793.  Their total net worth fell by 45% from $4.4 trillion to $2.4 trillion.  While the Standard & Poor’s 500 index fell 38.5%, Bill Gates Jr.’s net worth fell by 31% and Warren Buffett’s fell by 40%.  For more.

 

We Must Stop Abusive Business Behavior.

 

David Sirota noted, “Wall Street speculators steal from pensioners as our government bails out the thieves; employers pilfer from workers with the help of labor laws that undermine unions; oil companies profiteer off products that are warming the Earth; and heath insurers jack up premiums and ration coverage.”  All of these abuses and others can be curbed by appropriate regulation and taxes.  We must support and push our Bush administration to do so.

 

Here’s the Beef

We became a nation of speculators.  We lost.

Much uncertainty exists concerning future strength of stock market.

Bye bye retirement.

Dean Baker says IMF’s response to 1997 Asian economic collapse contributed to our present one.

Federal Reserve may be secretly subsidizing major financial companies.

Financial companies spent $5 billion for 12 legislative changes which largely caused our bubble.

Who’s harming the rich?  It’s the rich financial company executives.

Is government aid to financial companies capital or a loan?

Recovery must not depend on creating another bubble.  We need jobs with good earnings.

Using a variety of tactics, two thirds of Americans are reducing their spending.

As people reduce their debt, they may resume spending, but more cautiously than during bubble.

Wasteful military spending should be used instead to create green and infrastructure jobs.  For more.

Maintaining 1000 military bases overseas is expensive and empire building.  For more.

The almost $700 billion military budget is a lousy stimulus package.  Better spent on infrastructure.

Unemployment is increasing, may be 10% by end of the year, depending upon government stimulus.

$1000 tuition and 8 weeks study qualifies construction workers for some clean jobs.

Instead of wasting billions more, take over the banks.  For more.

Big banks.  Too big to fail.  Yuk.

American auto workers should produce public transit vehicles (rail cars and buses), not private cars..

Record 31.8 million are enrolled for food stamp benefits.

1.5 million American children are homeless.  That’s one in 50.

High among our priorities should be providing security and opportunity to all children.

Adopting children should be made much easier, to benefit both children and those who adopt them.

Kids need outdoors more than tons of toys.

Our Food and Drug Administration needs to reduce corporate influence of its approval system.

Bye bye toilet paper.  Save trees.  Use water like many of our world’s people do.

Greenhouse gas emissions cap and trade system will produce revenue for green programs.

Arctic summer ice could be gone in five years.

A new organization called 350 presents a globally unified approach to controlling climate change.

UN says bye bye water.  Bye bye California water.

1.1 million Darfur people threatened by starvation as Sudan expels aid organizations.  Where’s Obama?

When President Obama visits Turkey, will he call killing of Armenians genocide?

Was the Israeli massacre of Palestinians a crime against humanity?

 

Our Liberal Spirit

 

Courage Is Tough.  So Is Denial.

 

More frequently than we admit, we deny painful realities.  We deny our faults.  Our unconstructive habits.  Our addictions.  Without dealing with these realities, we continue through life as walking wounded. 

 

Before we will admit them, painful realities must often become too painful to ignore.  We must first reach our bottom, with our difficulties increasing faster than our ability to rationalize them away.  Some of us are more honest than others.  More willing than other to admit and confront painful realities.  I suspect those of us who are more honest are ones who have the most positive things to lose.  Maintaining a rich vision and variety of activities may be the basis for confronting obstacles.

 

Right now, Washington Democrats face a painful reality.  Without unpopular tax increases, our budget will gut most of what we have achieved over many years and stop any further achievements.  Is our vision for our state and our passion for our state programs enough to enable us to admit the necessity of tax increases?   Will we devise a tax reform strategy to mobilize popular support?  Or will we continue in a state of denial? 

 

Nationally also, we face a painful reality.  We must restrict our consumption and do more conserving.  Instead of borrowing, we must save and invest.  Instead of speculation, we must depend upon our earnings and savings.  Some of us are getting this message, but many, including many of our leaders, are still in denial.  What we all need is courage to face our newly obvious and uncomfortable realities.  Dave Thomas

 

Recommended Books – See our list of books for liberals

Alan Colmes, 2003, Red, White & Liberal.  How Left is Right & Right is Wrong

 

I do not recommend this book.  Alan Colmes appears on Fox Television’s Hannity & Colmes shouting match, with Colmes supposedly the Liberal one.  In this book, Colmes claims he is Liberal on some issues and Conservative on others.  His understanding of Liberal is the understanding which Conservatives have promoted for many decades.  His understanding of Conservative is that they want to return to past policies.  Both understandings are wrong.

 

Colmes’ mission is to persuade Conservatives to become Liberals, or at least more tolerant of Liberals.  He tries to do this by being softer and gentler or with mild sarcasm.  As is evident from the book, he seldom succeeds.  By appearing on Fox Television, Colmes is playing against the house. 

 

I believe a better strategy is to focus upon educating Liberals to be more effective, while leaving Conservatives to their rapidly diminishing bubble.  When we must confront them in election contests, we should go on the offensive, expressing our values and chastising them for obstructing their realization.  For more.  We should play on our field, not theirs.

 

I am comfortable saying, “If you like hate-filled, profane, sexually obsessed, racist, sexist, homophobic, military-service-dodging, ideology-before-science, deceptive, big government, budget unbalancing, incompetent, corrupt self-identified victims who disrespect and violate our basic American values and constitution, you’ll love Conservatives.  You’ll love repugnant, repulsive Republicans.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trash talking Fox News pundits, hate radio pundits such as Rush Limbaugh, New Conservative columnists and various Republican congress members are good examples.  Some Republicans don’t personally have all of these yucky traits; but they ally themselves with and support those who do.  They certainly don’t denounce them as Democratic congress members censored MoveOn for their childish reference to General Petraeas.  For more.

 

I don’t object to Republican people.  I object to their attitudes and behaviors.  I hope they can change their evil ways.  I hope that those who don’t change will be totally eliminated from public influence.  My tool for doing this is education.  Dave Thomas

 

 

 

 

Free Member Advertising

 

Hire Our Lake Hills Neighbors

 

Barbara Rader of Black Widow Web Development created our Puget Sound Liberals Website, to which I (not a technical geek) can easily add, modify and remove files.  Learn more about this unique company, which offers a 50% discount for organizations that promote social justice and environmental stewardship.  Dave Thomas

·       Auto Repair, price varies depending on job (but always fair), Jaime Speicher (AAS Auto Repair Technician) (425-746-2353)

·       Babysitting for infants (occasional evenings and weekends) - $5 per hour- Christy Pacheco- johnpacheco01@yahoo.com  425-653-3565

·       Data Entry- $10 per 12 font, double spaced page- Christy Pacheco (425-653-3565 johnpacheco01@yahoo.com)

·       Debt Elimination Counseling, Seminars and Workshops – price negotiable – Sherry Brandt (206-356-8034, somerev2@comcast.net)

·       Home Repair- prices vary, depending on job- John Pacheco 425-653-3565 johnpacheco01@yahoo.com)

·       Home Repair and Remodeling, Rick Hegdahl (206-227-6280  vikingnw@comcast.net)

·       Housekeeper, price negotiable – Laura Montano (641-5038 ambar_lau@hotmail.com)

·       Life Support Therapies, Astara Burlingame RN. (MD) holistic care, acupuncture hypno therapy, biological medicines (206-370-0356)

·       Private Piano Lessons (students must have a piano), afternoons - Anna Khosrowian (378-7938), price negotiable

·       Psychotherapist, accepts insurance -  Sandy Mathews (462-7889, www.sandramathews.com)