Puget Sound Liberals Weekly Newsletter #184

Enhancing Freedom, Opportunity and Cooperation in Puget Sound and Beyond

Through informing and networking Liberals and Liberal Organizations.

 

Our vision is hundreds of thousands of well-informed Washington Liberals  working together.

 

          3500 members                               July 24, 2009                formerly Lake Hills Liberals                

 

 

 

 

                                                     

Our Website                                   Our  Editor                  To Unsubscribe

 

              Table of Contents   *Featured Articles

 

About Puget Sound Liberals

Calendars of Events

Communication with our Members

Please Submit your Commentaries

 

Opportunities

Petitions

 

Commentaries from Our Members

David Spring: Tim Eyman’s Dishonest Initiative

Laslo Bako: Government Should Pay for Health Costs

Rich Austin: Most West Coast Senators Voted for F-22

 

Liberals and Democrats Links to the Beef

Government Watch*

 

State and Local Links to the Beef

Labor Won’t Raise Funds for state Democratic leaders*

Bye Bye Labor Money for Conservative Democrats*

Some Conservatives Are Rejoicing

Featured Advocacy Group: Progressive Majority

Why National Average School Funding Is Important*

When Opponents Are Self-Destructing, Don’t Interfere

 

Nation and World Links to the Beef

Congressional Democrats Fail to Support Labor*

Obama: Wake Up to Quality Jobs and Labor Concerns*

Norm Conrad: What Is a Corporation?

U.S. Government & Manufacturers Must Do More R&D.

 

Our Liberal Spirit

Valerie Tarico: How Beliefs Resist Change*

 

Recommended Books

 

 

 

Our Political Values

 

Our Political Priorities

 

·       Fair Clean Elections and Open Government

·       Fair Taxes and Competent Spending

·       Investment for Productivity

·       Quality Health, Education, Jobs, Income

·       Environmental Protection and Energy Independence

·       Security and Equal Rights

·       Justice and Peace Everywhere

·       International Cooperation and Leadership

 

Conservatives oppose all of these

 

     Let’s End Our National Nightmare

 

         Let’s Restore Our American Dream

 

More on Conservative opposition to our American Dream

 

Washington State’s 5 Major Needs

·       Federal Funding for Health and Education

·       Stop Corporate Abuse

·       Public Campaign Financing

·       Substitute a Progressive Income Tax

·       Replacing Conservative Legislators

 

Quotes of the Week

The moment we begin to fear the opinions of others and hesitate to tell the truth that is in us, and from motives of policy are silent when we should speak, the divine floods of light and life no longer flow into our souls.  Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815 - 1902)   More Stanton quotes

 

You get fifteen democrats in a room, and you get twenty opinions. Senator Patrick Leahy (1940 - )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Calendar of Events

Monday, August 10 at 6 PM to Wednesday, August 12 at 12:30 PM at Seattle University – National Vacations Matter Summit, with three hundred experts, advocates, and stakeholders from the fields of health, travel and tourism, family studies and the environment with other interested citizens.  $95.  To Register.  $120-180 for room for both nights, meals, and parking.  Sponsored by right2vacation.org

 

 

Calendars of Events                             

 

King County Democrats - LD Meetings            Some 2008 Legislature Lobby Days

Thurston County Progressive Net                  Western Washington Fellowship of Reconciliation

Alliance for Democracy                                Democratic Underground.Com                          

Sierra Club Cascade Chapter Calendar           Cool State Washington

Washington Public Campaigns Calendar          Town Hall Seattle Calendar

Washington State Labor Council                    Whatcom County Peace and Justice Calendar 

Conversation Cafe      Drinking Liberally          Seattle NOW          

Wallingford Neighbors for Peace and Justice – Friday Night Movies      Liberal films on PBS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Communication with Our Members

 

I am actively seeking to include more commentaries written by you readers.  Concerning health, education, work (labor), environment and other topics.  I prefer up to 2 pages; but have published excellent 6 page commentaries.  I would be glad to write only half or a third of our commentaries, with the rest of them written by you.  Please help our readers by sharing your expertise and Liberal Values.  Dave Thomas

 

Opportunities

Useful Websites: contacts, maps, community organizing tools, and more.

Access to jillions of political cartoons.

Create your own petition.

See all of President Obama’s weekly (Saturday) addresses.

Open Congress: Race Tracker

 

Petitions

Add your name to a television ad supporting a public health coverage option.

Tell your congress members that no recess until each house approves health care reform bill.

Tell your congress members that health care reform must include reproductive health care.

Tell your representative to support President Obama’s request for pre-K early childhood funding.

Tell the United Nations to urge all countries to end school violence.

Tell President Obama to work toward abolishing all nuclear weapons.

Tell your congress members and President Obama to pass the Hate Crimes Prevention Act.

Tell Attorney General Eric Holder to appoint a special prosecutor for Bush Administration crimes.

 

Commentaries From Our Members

 

David Spring: Tim Eyman’s Initiative is Factually and Legally Dishonest

 

Thanks to millions of dollars from the illegal BIAW insurance pool slush fund propping up his “Astroturf” roots organization, Tim Eyman has qualified yet another Initiative for the Fall ballot. Eyman claims his cap is needed to limit “out of control” government spending. But I-1033 would do much more than cap State spending, It would place a lowest common denominator limit on State revenue, condemning our public school funding to remain among the lowest in the nation.

 

There are two shortcomings to Eyman’s shortsighted Initiatives. The first is that they are factually dishonest. The truth is that State spending is not actually out of control. In fact, according to the Washington State Department of Revenue, State spending as a percent of income has fallen about 20% in the past 12 years. As a consequence, State spending for public schools, colleges and public universities is at the lowest point in our State’s history and is now far below the national average. In turn, our State suffers from the lowest percentage of 9th Graders who go on to complete college. It is morally wrong to sacrifice the future of our children, and our State’s economic future, just so millionaires in our State can buy bigger yachts.

 

The second shortcoming of Eyman’s Initiatives is that they are legally dishonest. Article 7, Section One of our State Constitution states: “The power of taxation shall never be suspended, surrendered or contracted away.” Our State Constitution makes it clear that the power of our State legislature to levy taxes (in order to pay for public schools) within the bounds of the one percent Constitutional limit can not be suspended. Mr. Eyman cannot amend our State Constitution and deprive our public schools of adequate funding merely by passing an Initiative. Therefore every one of his Initiatives are unconstitutional. If Mr. Eyman does not like this Section of our State Constitution, then he should submit his proposals not merely as Initiatives, but as a Constitutional Amendments.

 

 A few months ago, in Brown versus Owen, our State Supreme Court concluded that Senator Brown had the power to over-ride I-747 (another Eyman Initiative) with a simple majority vote of the Senate. We voters have the same power. Let's send a message to Mr. Eyman that we are tired of his hidden backers and their well financed attempts to avoid paying their fair share for public schools. Eyman and the BIAW have driven our public schools and universities to near bankruptcy. Shame on Tim Eyman and shame on the BIAW!

 

I have a different idea. Despite the Great Recession, we still have one of the top 20 economies in America. There is no reason we cannot at least have a national average tax structure. It is time for parents to start sticking up for the right of our children to have at least national average school funding. It is time for legislators and other community leaders to start challenging Mr. Eyman's misleading propaganda with the truth. It is time for all of us to put an end to Eyman’s destructive charade.  Let's restore national average State taxes so we can have national average public schools. Vote No on I- 1033.

 

David Spring is the Executive Director of the Fair School Funding Coalition, a non-profit educational organization dedicated to restoring school funding in Washington State to the national average. Their website is fairschoolfundingcoalition.org.   For more about Eyman’s initiative 1033.

 

Laslo Bako: Government Should Pay for Health Costs

 

Thoughts about health care and economy.

 

What health care, what economy?

 

I am a Denturist practitioner.  I provide patient-removable dental appliances for my patients who come mostly from retirement age or near to it.  This is the age group cannot expect more wealth from life.  No more promotion at work, no more second or part time work.  Their work load capability is less than it was in their younger years.  So their dollars cannot be stretched, they are poorer nowadays compared to that time when economy was better and they were younger.

 

Patients come for a consultation – which is free – to find out what their dental needs are and if they can afford to take care of those needs?  The majority have complete dentures, but there are significant numbers of partial wearers also.  45% of the American population has removable dental appliances.  40% of our fellow citizens cannot afford any health insurance, let alone dental insurances.  A single crown is in the thousand dollars range, a single denture or partial on the average about fifteen hundred. 

 

A high dental insurance coverage is about two thousand per year.  The average retirement is about fifteen hundreds per month.  So the person who need both upper and lover removable dental appliances cannot afford to get a new set for a long time.  Besides paying for utilities, mortgage loan or rent, car payment, eat and buy gasoline, how could he possibly save for dentures, crowns or bridges?  Forget vacations!

 

My background is Hungarian.  I have been here in the states for 32 years.  I raised children, redid my European diploma (which was not accepted here), built my clinic from scratch, suffered a slow start, had all those monthly payments, and paid lots of taxes.  If I would need myself dental attention in my own mouth, I couldn’t afford it either. Luckily I was born with good genes and I am in a good shape with my natural teeth.  I sympathize with my patient greatly and try to help them as much as I can with affordable prices all the time.

 

Knowing how well-working the universal medicine system in Europe, I wonder how come we don’t listen to Michael Moore, who proved its worthiness with his movie.  He visited a few European countries, including England, France, Germany, also visited Canada, and even Cuba to prove that it works for both the government and the citizens.  America is the only western civilization where the uninsured and uncared number of people is so sky-high.  Great numbers of people are dying because they ran out of insurance coverage, and no receive no help to save them.  In many cases children are the mortal victims.  So, how-come that we Americans of this great nation don’t implement universal medicine?  Are we the prisoners of particular associations or insurance companies?  How can we pat ourselves on the shoulder and say that we are the greatest, the real example for the world, when even Cuba got ahead of us and successfully implemented social health and social security for their people?

 

Many times those subjects come up when a retired or one on the poverty level sits in my chair and sigh with great sadness saying: “ … to bad, I cannot afford a new denture, can you at least repair my outdated 10, 20+ old junk cheaply, so I could chew a little-bit better? …”  Many patients loose weight, subsequently their health, simply because they cannot eat properly.  Who has the guts to tell them that this healthcare system of ours works, or if we are a humane society?  Considering the average citizen, this medical system is a complete, utter failure.  It is only good for the insurance companies who harvest high profits at the expense of and harm to poor.

 

I would be happy to be paid by the government instead of the patients, who wouldn’t be concerned and handicapped by the cost. but would instead be properly helped.  They pay taxes!  But his money doesn’t go to providing dental insurance?  In the European world the practitioner freely helps the patient with whatever needed for his/her health.  His hand is not tied down with the patient’s capability, if he can pay for the care.  Laslo Bako

 

Rich Austin: Most Western Senators Vote to Fund F-22 Fighter Jets

 

Good news! The Senate voted 58-40 to cut funding for the F-22 boondoggle after Obama threatened to veto the military-industrial complex's taxpayer subsidy.

 

Note that all west coast senators except Oregon's Wyden and Merkley voted with the warmongers: Cantwell (D-WA), Murray (D-WA), Tester (D-MT),  Boxer (D-CA), Feinstein (D-CA), Baucus (D-MT), Bingaman (D-NM), Udall (D-NM, Inouye (D-HI), and Akaka (D-HI). 

 

Other Democrats voting to fund F-22’s are Begich (D-AK), Byrd (D-WV), Dodd (D-CT), Sheehan  (D-NH) and Lieberman (D-CT). They were joined by 25 Republican Senators.  Not voting were Kennedy (D-MA) and Mikulski (D-MD).  Rich Austin

 

For more.  For more.  For more.  This is Old Politics in Action.  These inconsistently Liberal Democrats voted like Conservatives, guilty of incompetence (malfeasance) and corruption. While we are struggling to fund health care reform, they are voting to waste money on military equipment our military doesn’t need or want.  They should be replaced by Consistent Liberals.  It remains to be seen how Washington’s Democratic House members will vote concerning funding of F-22s.  Dave Thomas

Liberals and Democrats

Government Watch

Also go to Whitehouse.gov.

 

President Obama Says We Must Rebuild Something Better.

Obama’s commentary ended with, “Providing all Americans with the skills they need to compete is a pillar of a stronger economic foundation, and, like health care or energy, we cannot wait to make the necessary changes. We must continue to clean up the wreckage of this recession, but it is time to rebuild something better in its place. It won't be easy, and there will continue to be those who argue that we have to put off hard decisions that we have already deferred for far too long. But earlier generations of Americans didn't build this great country by fearing the future and shrinking our dreams. This generation has to show that same courage and determination. I believe we will.  We have advanced from Yes we can. to I believe we will.

 

To read Obama’s whole commentary.   See what he said earlier. 

 

Health Care

50 Representatives will vote against health reform bill that doesn’t include robust public insurance option, such that Republican votes would be needed to pass it.  President Obama’s personal physician criticizes commercial media for not fully covering all health care reform options.  Representative Kucinich’s amendment allows states to form single payer systems.  For more.  Some doctors, unions and others are pushing single payer health reform.  The AMA has now approved the house’s health care reform bill.  Paul Krugman argues that health care is within reach; it is both workable and affordable.  House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says House health care reform bill has enough votes to pass it.  

 

Many powerful special interests are opposing reforms in health care spending, including monopoly protections and subsidies.   Against the interests of small businesses, Chamber of Commerce opposes health care reform.  Special interests are still making campaign contributions to congressional members, including Senator Max Baucus, chair of the Senate Finance committee. 

 

Like 1993, opponents of health care reform are advertising.  As before their advertising is misleading.  One ad features a Canadian who says U.S. health care saved her life, when Canada delayed treatment.  But it turns out; she didn’t have cancer, only a benign condition.  For a comparison of Canadian and American systems.  Unlike 1993, proponents of reform are spending more money than opponents.  Harry and Louise now support health care reform.  A poll shows that those who like their private insurance best are the ones who use it the least.  

 

All three House committees and one of two Senate committees have approved health reform bills.  We now need approval by the other Senate committee and by the full house and senate.  The House Ways and Means Committee’s proposed surcharge on the very high income will still leave their taxes less than it was after Kennedy’s tax cut and before Reagan’s tax cut.  A tax increase on high income people to fund health care reform may also produce fairer taxation and less economic inequality.  For more.  For more.

 

The suggestion that health care reform is likely to not pass is largely a media creation.  My understanding is that the House can pass their version.   Only 6 Democratic Senators appear to be ready to oppose passage of any likely bill, leaving 54 to pass it, enough under reconciliation.  Even if there were only 50, Vice President Joe Biden would break the tie.  For more.  Blue dogs raise various objections, but some of their concerns are likely to be addressed.  Some opposed congress members are saying health reform is proceeding too fast.  Is 60 years too fast?  Tell your congress members that no recess until each house approves health care reform bill.

 

If we pass health reform and make it work, Republicans will suffer greatly.  Otherwise, Republicans may benefit.  But maybe not.  Having let congress take the lead, President Obama is now urging them to adopt health care reform legislation in each house before the August 10 recess.  More than many Democrats, Obama realizes how much power Democrats have.  At Obama’s Wednesday’s press conference, he strongly emphasized the negative consequences that most of us, our businesses, our government and economy will experience without health care reform.  For more.  For the entire transcript or video.  Also view or watch his Monday health care roundtable with health care providers.  For more.

 

Action in Many Arenas

The Congress (both House and Senate members) are still practitioners of Old Special Interest Politics: protecting committee turf, voting for military and other pork, even if our Obama Administration doesn’t want it, and more.  How about primary challenges to Conservative Democrats?  The Progressive Change Campaign Committee is now assisting Liberal Congressional candidates.  For more.

A watchdog report is untrue,  that financial bailout cost may total $4.7 trillion and obligations may total $23.7 trillion.  Some of the $4.7 trillion hasn’t been spent and won’t be.  The $23.7 figure is much higher than the net exposure, which would only occur if our economy severely worsens.

Senate Votes to eliminate F-22 fighter jets, not wanted by Obama Administration.  For more.

The chair of Congress’s new Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission is an aggressive reformer.  For more.

The proposed Consumer Financial Protection Agency fills a major need.  The banks, from which it would protect consumers, are lobbying intensely to defeat it.  For more.  For more.

Right to Rent would assist foreclosed landowners, without government cost.

Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act will greatly help college students.

Our military plans to implement various strategies to end smoking within 20 years.

Food safety legislation may hurt small farmers.

To protect endangered species, Interior Department is restricting Oregon logging.

The Interior Department barred the filing of new uranium mining claims on 1 million acres of stunning, irreplaceable public lands near the park -- lands that will now be off limits to uranium exploitation for two years while the government studies its options for permanent protection.  For more.

President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton seek to enhance U.S. global leadership through increasing cooperation with other nations.  They place responsibility for Democracy on each country’s people.

How Richard Holbrook became Special Representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Read or watch President Obama’s speech in Accra, Ghana.

Meeting with Iraq Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, President Obama says U.S. military exiting from Iraq will meet agreed deadlines.

U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk pledges greater protection of worker rights.

Senate includes Hate Crimes bill in defense bill.  Senate will vote on an amendment to allow people with a concealed gun permit in one state to use it in almost all states, including ones that ban them.

House Intelligence Committee will investigate CIA assassination program.

ACLU says Attorney General Eric Holder should initiate torture investigation.

 

Here’s the Beef

Media Matters exposes conservative radio hosts who regularly attack immigrants, women, the LGBT community, minorities, the poor and homeless, progressives, unions, college students, and even autistic children.

 

State and Local

 

2009 Washington legislature had dismal record on labor issues.  For more.

Rating Washington State Senators on their 2009 labor votes.  

Rating Washington State Representatives on their 2009 labor votes.

Labor adopts new strategy concerning Democratic legislators which oppose labor issues.

 

Labor declares fundraising war on state Dem leaders

Posted by Chris Grygiel on SeattlePI.com on 7/13/2009.

 

The state's labor community says it will try to hit Democratic leaders where it hurts most - the pocketbook.  Labor, usually staunch allies of Democrats, is frustrated by the party's failure to get key legislation passed during the legislative session and by what they perceive as Democratic leadership's hostility to their issues.

 

The Washington State Labor Council on Monday said it has created a new political action committee that would funnel money directly to candidates it feels supports their causes and not to House and Senate party funds controlled by party bosses. Washington State Labor Council President Rick Bender said labor had previously given hundreds of thousands of dollars to those funds

 

Now the Labor Council will urge members and individual unions to give to the 'Don't Invest in More Excuse' (DIME) PAC. Bender also said the Labor Council would change how it evaluates candidates and look beyond individual votes taken. Bender said unions will take a more holistic approach, considering things like action not taken as opposed to how politicians vote on certain bills.  "The status quo is gone," Bender said in an interview Monday.

 

Democrats enjoy healthy majorities in both the House and the Senate and Gov. Chris Gregoire is a Democrat as well. However union activists feel the party is too beholden to business interests, particularly the state's powerful builders' lobby.

 

During the most recent legislative session the labor community was particularly incensed when legislation known as the Workers' Privacy Act was killed by Democratic leadership. That measure - which was opposed by Boeing and other businesses - would have restricted companies' ability to discuss union matters with workers. Democratic leadership shelved the measure after some members received an e-mail from the Labor Council that implied Democrats would stop getting campaign money unless they enacted the bill.  Democratic leadership went so far as to refer the e-mail to the State Patrol for possible criminal investigation. Authorities determined no law was broken.

 

"We thought we had commitments from the leadership, the governor, the House and the Senate," Bender said of the Workers' Privacy Act. "We found out that commitment was broken. It could've been handled in a much different way, but they decided to overplay their hand and they're getting burnt because they did so."

 

Dwight Pelz, chairman of the state Democratic Party, said the last legislative session was one of the "toughest in the history of the state" as lawmakers dealt with a $9 billion operating budget deficit.  "We understand that organized labor was disappointed by some of the actions of the Legislature," Pelz said. "We in the Democratic Party are working hard to repair our traditional strong relationship with the labor community."  Chris Grygiel

 

No More Mr. Nice Union

Published in Puget Sound Business Journal on 7/14/2009

 

After a rough legislative session for labor, the Washington State Labor Council announced a sharp change in strategy.  Labor’s campaign contributions and volunteer efforts will go to candidates with a track record of supporting labor issues, “not just to build political majorities,” according to the WSLC Legislative Report.

 

State Democrats can say goodbye to contributions to caucus committees and to safe-seat incumbents, contributions that party leadership can use with some flexibility. The Labor Council will ask members and individual unions to donate to a new political action committee, the DIME PAC, which stands for Don’t Invest in More Excuses. The PAC will target contributions to party members who support labor, regardless of their affiliation, according to the report.

 

The Labor Council will also change the way it evaluates candidates. WSLC says party leaders are trying to protect certain members by denying votes on some legislation or blocking recorded roll-call votes. So the council will dig in to the sausage-making behind bills – for example, taking note of legislators who co-sponsored bills popular with labor but then work behind closed doors to kill it.  And unions may get behind ballot initiatives that take labor issues directly to the voters, circumventing the Legislature entirely.

 

At the upcoming Aug. 6-8 WSLC convention in Wenatchee, members, unions and lawmakers will be hearing a lot more about the new strategy. But some key members of the state Democratic leadership won’t – they’re not invited.

 

Read my commentary: Washington State Needs a New Democratic Party, in last week’s newsletter.  There will be more commentary of this next week.  Dave Thomas

 

Some Conservatives Are Rejoicing

 

Conservatives may think that Conservative Democrats who don’t receive labor contributions will vote conservatively.  But they already do.  It wouldn’t even do much damage if some of them are replaced by Republicans.  To make a difference, it is necessary to replace them with Liberal Democrats.  Ones who are more concerned with our public welfare than with the special interests represented by the Building Industry Association of Washington (BIAW).  More on this topic will appear in next week’s newsletter.  Dave Thomas

 

Featured Advocacy Group --- Progressive Majority -------------------------------

 

Progressive Majority’s mission is to elect progressive champions. We accomplish this by identifying and recruiting the best progressive leaders to run for office; coaching and supporting their candidacies by providing strategic message, campaign, and technical support; prioritizing the recruitment and election of candidates of color; and bringing new people into the political process at all levels.

 

Progressive Majority’s agenda includes:

·       Economic Justice: Prosperity should be accessible to everyone, not merely the few.

·       Civil Rights: Every individual's civil rights must be protected; discrimination and harassment based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or physical and developmental ability should be banned.

·       Health Care: Every individual should have affordable, quality health care.

·       Education: It is essential that we invest in quality public education for all.

·       Environment: We must commit to restoring and protecting our environment.

·       Reproductive Freedom: Women and men - not politicians - deserve the right to make personal decisions about their reproductive health in accordance with their own personal and moral beliefs.

 

Progressive Majority President Gloria A. Totten says, "Progressive Majority is not giving conservatives a chance to regroup. We haven't let up on recruiting and electing progressives since we opened our doors in Washington State in 2004. In 2008, Progressive Majority elected 10 progressives to local and state offices. Through their successful campaigns, our candidates are proving that progressive values are American values."  Together with our Washington State Democratic Party, Progressive Majority is training candidates in Eastern Washington

 

Why National Average School Funding Is Important

 

Why National Average School Funding is Important

National average school funding is essential to insure national average class sizes. The national average class size in lower grades is 16 students and in upper grades it is 22 students. By contrast, in Washington State, actual class sizes often exceed 30 to even 40 students. As a consequence of our State’s failure to adequately fund public schools, our kids must endure some of the most over-crowded classrooms in America. This leaves them so unprepared for future careers that we now have the lowest percentage of 9th Graders who go on to complete college. 

 

Thus, our Hi Tech industry is forced to do their recruiting by bringing in better trained applicants from out-of State. Our children and our economy suffer when we short change our public schools.  Extensive research has shown that small class sizes are very important in the lower grades. But small class sizes have also been shown to be extremely important in the middle and upper grades. For example, students with smaller High School classes are more likely to remain in school through graduation and have greater chances of completing college and thus have higher wages and less unemployment later in life.

 

Under-funding public schools also harm kids in dozens of other less noticeable ways:

·       Over crowded cafeterias mean that some kids will get lunch starting at 10 am while other must wait until one pm. 

·       Fewer computers in our schools causing kids to line up just to get a chance to go online.

·       Overcrowded schools leads to more disruptive student behaviors and less time available for productive learning.

·       Overcrowded schools also increase teacher burnout and reduce teacher retention.

·       Overcrowded schools also cause more kids to “slip between the cracks.” This is especially true for children with unusual learning styles and kids from poorer economic backgrounds.

 

Our kids will have to compete with kids from other States, not only for spots in good colleges, but also for good jobs in the global market place. Overcrowded classes place our kids at a severe disadvantage before the race for success has even begun. 

 

Our schools are over-crowded and falling apart.

Not only has our legislature failed to provide adequate funds for operating schools, but they have also failed to supply funds for the repair and building of schools. In particular, our Legislature has failed to help growing communities build urgently needed schools. While the State claims to “match” up to 50% of school construction costs, the Legislature’s distorted school construction “formulas” result in a “match” of as little as 3% of actual school construction costs. As a consequence, over half of school construction bonds have gone down to defeat in the past 10 years and over 10% of the one million children in our public schools now go to school in particle board boxes 

 

National Average School Funding Promotes a stronger economic future

There is no greater danger to the economy of our State than inadequate funding for our schools. Investing in public schools leads to a stronger economy and a lower crime rate. When we fail to provide our kids with adequate schools, the entire economy suffers. Not only are we failing to provide employers with a highly trained workforce, but we will end up with more kids in dead end jobs, teen pregnancies, broken families and higher crime rates. It costs over $60,000 a year to keep one person in prison. So we either pay for schools now or we pay for prisons later. PAY NOW OR PAY LATER: If we do not help kids get a good education now, our State will have a lower economic base and much higher social services costs in the future:

 

Education Level

Median Earnings 2000

Unemployment Rate 2001

Less than High School

$21,391

7.3%

High School Graduate

$28,807

4.2%

Associate Degree

$35,386

2.9%

Bachelor’s Degree

$46,276

2.5%

Master’s Degree

$55,302

2.1%

Doctorate Degree

$70,476

1.1%

Source: US Census Bureau

 

National Average School Funding establishes a precise minimum baseline

A common complaint of the voters about past measures to provide more school funding is that there was no guarantee that the additional funding would actually go to increasing school funding. The State legislature has a long history of diverting money away from public schools to pay for an assortment of pet projects. As a consequence, school spending, as a percent of capital and operating budgets has fallen significantly since 1995. A key provision of the funding options described in this report is that each has precise accountability language which requires that all funds resulting from the funding measure must be spent on public schools until school funding reaches at least the national average.

 

This will give the public confidence that they will actually get what they are paying for and that the funds will not be diverted for any other purpose.  Washington State has a per capita income of $40,000 which is 16th highest in the nation.  In other words, we live in one of the richest States in America. With modest reform of our State tax structure, we could easily afford national average school funding without raising taxes on our poor or middle class.

 

National Average School Funding is required by our State Constitution 

It is the Paramount duty of the state to make ample provision for the education of all children residing within its borders…Article 9, Section One, Washington State Constitution

 

Join our Fair School Funding Coalition.

 

When Your Opponents Are Self Destructing, Don’t Interfere

 

You may have noticed, that we haven’t commented much about Christian Conservatives, especially Washington Christian Conservatives.  Since they are self destructing, I think we should leave them alone to continue.  To get involved would only encourage them to unite in opposition to us.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Here’s the Beef

States are leading on social issues; but failing on economic ones.

Puget Sound’s experienced aerospace workers are a key resource for Boeing.

More localities may ban bottled water.

Urban city lot greenhouses feed local people.  For more.

Chicago passes nation’s first healthy food and climate legislation

New rooming house will provide inexpensive minimum size rooms.

Oakland, CA city council is asking voters to approve taxing medical marijuana stores.

San Francisco, CA now has more medical marijuana stores than it has Starbucks coffee shops.

Cherry glut reduces prices and causes some to go unpicked, harming cherry farmers.

Oregon passes a series of greenhouse gas laws.

Oregon provides $80 million bond to build Portland building which provides own energy and no waste.

Reflective white roof paint greatly reduces need for air conditioning.

To conserve much energy, building codes should require energy audits.

What is a green job?

Governments can take various steps to help us become physically fit.

Washington is one of only 13 states to adequately fund children’s health.

Police shouldn’t take offense at verbal abuse, only arrest if physically resisting arrest.

Representatives Jim McDermott and Adam Smith have cosponsored Fair Elections Now Act.  

 

We know about ‘Small is beautiful.’  How about ‘Slow is beautiful’.

 

Washington State Democratic Chair Dwight Pelz is using our national health care reform struggle to raise money for our state Democrats.  I don’t know of any efforts by the state party to increase support for health care reform.  And many of our Democratic congress members appear uncommitted.  Just look at their websites.  Dave Thomas

 

Nation and World  

 

Congressional Democrats Have Failed to Support Labor

Posted on Democrats.com on 7/13/2009

 

The Democrats in Congress have sold out their supporters in the labor movement by giving up the so-called “card-check” feature of the embattled Employee Free Choice Act, which makes the “reform”
legislation that has been billed as labor’s “number one issue” much less of a reform. Instead of being hammered into line on this issue by party leaders and by President Obama, who has long pledged to back EFCA, conservative Democrats in the House and Senate were allowed to join Republicans in opposing the measure, leading to its replacement with a vague plan to require quicker secret-ballot elections in union-organizing drives.  Dave Lindorff  For more.

 

Obama: Wake Up to Quality Jobs and Other Labor Concerns

 

I commented two weeks ago that “I recently became aware of how little the Obama Administration has given to improving earnings.  I am amazed that labor unions aren’t loudly complaining.   Immediately following the passage of health care reform, Obama must address increasing worker’s earnings.  See Chuck Collins’ 2000 book, Economic Apartheid in America for measures which must be implemented.”  This is a must read for Liberals concerned with labor issues and quality jobs.  View the movie Norma Rae again, as I did recently.

 

Last week, I commented about the Obama Administration’s failure to emphasize labor concerns.  We don’t need just more jobs.  We need more jobs which pay fair wages, offer security, provide safety protections, otherwise protect worker’s rights,(including rights to unionize and increased penalties for businesses that violate these rights.  Until card check, contract mediation, and other labor legislation is passed, our Administration should strictly enforce existing labor laws.  Dave Thomas

 

What Is a Corporation, Anyway?

 

Modern corporations dominate the organizational and economic landscape of America and most of the rest of planet earth.  Many claim that they also dominate our political landscape as well.  We encounter them every day in the products we buy, where we work, what we see on signs and TV, etc., etc.  But what, exactly, is a corporation?  What are its rights and limitations?  What are its duties and responsibilities?  Does or should it have the same rights that are inalienable to all human beings?

 

What follows is a bit of history surrounding this issue and a discussion of a legal framework to help understand it.  The story starts before there was a United States of America and continues to this day.

 

The first issue is a simple one:  where does the power or right come from to create a legitimate government?  Our Founding Fathers unequivocally answered that the only legitimate source of governmental power was and is the consent of the people.  The reason this obvious fact is important is that many Americans do not really understand where their rights originate.  Many think that their rights are granted by the Constitution, specifically by the Bill of Rights.  That is not true.  Our rights predate the Constitution and any other written document.  Our rights are, to quote Thomas Jefferson in The Declaration of Independence, “unalienable”.  They are the birthright of all human beings.  “We the people…” in agreement with each other created the government.  We give that government certain duties and responsibilities.  We give it the power to make laws and perform acts that “…establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence (sic), promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity….”  The rest of the Constitution creates the mechanisms for doing that.  When creating the judiciary, it was given only the power to interpret and clarify.  Then come the amendments, the first ten of which are the Bill of Rights.

 

It is important to realize that those amendments are not and cannot be the sum total of our rights.  James Madison and the other primary authors of the Constitution did not want a listing of rights for fear that they would come to be seen as the only rights we have.  The Ninth and Tenth Amendments are Madison’s attempt to clearly acknowledge that the people retain powers beyond those delegated to our governments.  The Bill of Rights merely highlights some of our “…unalienable Rights…” for clarity.  Those and others were ours before we wrote the Constitution and they are ours still.

 

The second issue is also fairly simple.  What powers did we or can we give our governments?  As we all know, we can argue endlessly over this one.  But for our purposes in talking about corporations, it is not all that complex.  “We the People of the United States…” are what I will call primary entities – the originators of our government.  The government is a secondary, subsidiary entity of our creation.  It is our servant.  We give it limited powers to enact and enforce laws, sign treaties and organize a defense against foreign threats.  Anything that the government creates, but only with our consent by only those powers we give it, is a still more subordinate or a third rank entity.

 

Now, we are ready to address our primary question.  What, exactly, is a corporation?  It is a business with a piece of paper called a charter.  Who grants a charter?  State or federal governments?  What rights, etc. can governments give a corporation?  Only those which We expressly delegated to those governments.  This is the central issue.

 

Nothing in the Constitution gives the federal government the right to charter corporations.  But nothing prohibits it, either.  State governments have written into their regulations and laws the procedures for incorporation.  But did We the People ever grant those states that power?

 

Before we try to answer that, we need to take an excursion into our history.  We begin in colonial America in 1773.  The king of England and Parliament had just enacted a bill to eliminate the tea tax for its multinational monopoly trading organization, the East India Company.  The intent was to eliminate all competition by the colonists engaged in the tea trade.  The result was the Boston Tea Party.  The East India Company, a corporation chartered by the British government, was reviled by most colonists as a gouger and destroyer of colonial entrepreneurs.  The very idea of a corporation was anathema to most Americans because they were monopolies.  Therefore, whenever a corporation was contemplated, its charter limited its purpose a specific public benefit (such as building a road or a canal), limited its lifetime (say 10 or 20 years. after which the project became public property) and set up rigorous standards of operation and severe penalties for failure to meet them (such as inadequate road maintenance, which usually resulted in revocation of the charter).

 

When industrialists gained considerable wealth during the heady expansion of the early 1800s and later after the Civil War, they wanted to preserve their gains and create their own business empires to honor their achievements.  The moneyed elites pressed governments and the courts to greatly expand the lifespan and operating capability of corporations.  A few states in the Northeast gave them what they wanted. Their life expectancy became infinite.  Their obligation became the general public good instead of project specific.  And their range of action became broad and virtually unregulated.  But none gave them the reward they prized above all – full-blooded, constitutionally recognized and protected personhood.  Every time the subject came before the court, it was rebuffed.  In 1855 in Dodge v. Woolsey, the courts said, that the People had not

 …released their power over the artificial bodies which originate under the legislation of their represen­tatives....  Combinations...in society...united by the bond of a corporate spirit...unquestionably desire limitations upon the sovereignty of the people.... But the framers of the Constitution were imbued with no desire to call into existence such combinations.

Again, in 1876 in Munn v. Illinois, the Court denied corporate personhood.  But, when in 1886 the Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad case came before the Supreme Court, something very strange happened.  Either in error or by malicious intent, the clerk summarizing the decision, wrote that the Court determined that the 14th Amendment, written to outlaw persecution of former slaves by Southern states, protected corporations, as persons, under the equal protection and due process clauses.  The odd thing is that the court did not actually say that in the majority decision.  In fact the Chief Justice, in a personal communication, specifically told the clerk that they did not decide whether or not corporations were persons.  But there it sits, in the head notes of the case.  Again, it is important to note that the Supreme Court in all its previous rulings denied corporations such constitutionally protected personhood.  This claim in the head notes has no precedent.  Unfortunately, most lawyers never actually read the full opinions of the court, only the summaries in the head notes.  This unprecedented and bizarre case became the open gate through which corporations stampeded to gain new power and new freedom from regulation and taxation.  In the 20 years from 1890 to 1910, the Supreme Court heard 307 cases involving the 14th Amendment; only 19 involved natural, human persons.   In the years since, almost all public obligations have been stripped from state regulations governing corporations.  Since the 70s, the courts have continued to elevate the “rights” of corporations far beyond the 14th Amendment.  In addition to equating corporate commercial messages with political speech and money with free speech, they have even granted corporations the “right” to lie.

 

Now let’s answer the question of whether We the People granted to our governments the right to create constitutionally protected persons.  Nothing in the Constitution or any of the state constitutions shows a grant of personhood to government or the authority to, in effect, give birth.  No second tier government entity is capable of granting human rights to any entity, not to mention its paper, third tier entities because the government is not sovereign, only We the People are.  The answer, I believe, is clearly, no.  We did not give the government full-blooded personhood.  The government has no ability to give full-blooded personhood to anything else.  Even a careless reading of the 14th Amendment cannot ignore the opening words in Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside.

Corporations are neither born nor naturalized; they are not citizens; they are only written documents.  The only persons We the People give personhood to are our children.

 

What is a corporation?  It is a business enterprise with a piece of paper which gives it the ability to make contracts, own property and file lawsuits.  It also limits the financial liability of its owners and their families in the event the business fails.  Period.  It is in all other respects a totally artificial fantasy.

 

I leave to your imagination what we should consider doing about these misbegotten Goliaths.  Norm Conrad

 

Why U.S. Manufacturer's Need to Find Common Ground

 

Protectionists may have had it right when they decried the loss of manufacturing jobs in the U.S. After decades of outsourcing factory work to low-wage countries, the nation has shed not only millions of low-skill jobs; it no longer can make many of the high-value goods that matter in the 21 century. The not-made-in-the-U.S. list ranges from light-emitting diodes, flat-panel displays, and electric-car batteries to the carbon-fiber components of Boeing's 787 Dreamliner and Amazon.com's Kindle e-reader.

 

More alarming, the U.S. is losing its ability to create big-impact products as research and development is increasingly transferred to foreign lands that have become manufacturing leaders in, say, computers or telecom gear. Except for Apple's products, for instance, every U.S. brand of notebooks is now designed in Asia.

 

What to do? Government and private industry must work together to rebuild what can be called the nation's industrial commons. This is akin to the grazing land that farmers shared for their herds. Industrial commons would include R&D that could be housed in universities or consortiums, often centered in a particular city or region to make sharing easier. Skills would be retained while innovations would recharge the U.S. economy. (Harvard Business Review) Page 1 2 3

 

 

Here’s the Beef

Unfortunately, our commercial media pundits have forsaken Walter Cronkite’s respect for objective truthful reporting.

We need to shift from consumerism, debt and speculation to sustaining our health and planet.

America needs an industrial and manufacturing strategy which guides our infrastructure spending, our tax incentives, our job training and education and our trade policies.  

A handbook for changing form an industrial food system to a sustainable one.

To reduce global warming, we can’t just clean up after consumption.  We must reduce consumption.

Corporate abuse of workers abounds.

Like tobacco companies, pharmaceutical companies seeks to addict us on their products.

Like tobacco companies, chemical companies lie about their products ill effects.

Due to monopoly, dairy processors and other factors, bye bye dairies.

Are our large financial companies profiting from doing things that regulations should prohibit?

Goldman Sachs repaid TARP money, but not other billions of government money it received.

Large banks misused TARP funds, used it for other purposes than making loans.

Purchasers of government debt aren’t worried about inflation.  A better indicator than seers.

85% of stimulus-recovery impact will occur before the end of 2010.

July 24, 2009 increased minimum wage will generate $5.5 billion consumer spending.

Increased minimum wage of $7.25 per hour has less buying power than the 1956 minimum wage.

Despite efforts to prevent mortgage foreclosures, they reach a record high.

Home and community based health services can help some of 11 million people to stay in their homes.

No matter your job or income, can your race, sexual preference or personal style bar you from the middle class?

My favorite macro economist Joe Stiglitz is respected abroad, but not here in our U.S.

A major strategy for improving public education is more class time: longer days, more weeks.

Bill Gates calls for education reform to improve graduation rates.

American Indians struggle with defining who are tribal members.

Indonesians have held two peaceful Democratic elections and its economy is performing well.

Foreign aid should be made more effective through increased transparency and accountability.

Mid East maneuvering concerning terrorism may be more about oil.

Besides protecting ourselves for al Qaeda, we must fight the Taliban to protect women.

Iran opposition to President Ahmadinejad continues.

Israeli settlers intend to incorporate Palestine into Israel.  There are now 300,000 Jewish settlers there.

Israeli companies profit from Israeli occupation of Palestine.

Chinese government oppression may stimulate Uighur extremism.

China is strategically buying foreign businesses, aided by their depressed prices.  More.  More.  More. 

 

Our Liberal Spirit

 

How Beliefs Resist Change

Christian Belief through the Lens of Cognitive Science

 

The Jesuits have a saying sometimes attributed to Francis Xavier, “Give me the child until he is seven, and I will give you the man.”  The Jesuits were a tad optimistic, but ample research on identity formation shows that religious, cultural, and political identity become established by early adulthood and rarely change thereafter except in response to crisis.  In fact, even in the face of crisis, core beliefs about who we are and why we are here, can be remarkably resilient.

 

This is due in part to the fact that individual beliefs do not exist in isolation.  Rather, each exists as part of a whole network of other beliefs, memories, and attitudes.  The more central or important any given belief, the more it is entangled with the rest of our world view.  And the more it is tied into the tangle, the harder it is to change.  Because religious views are so central, they are particularly resistant to change. 

 

To make things even more complicated, each religion has what can be called an immune system.   Because traditional Christianity is centered on orthodoxy, meaning right belief, the immune system consists of a set of teachings that guard against other beliefs or loss of belief.  Christianity’s immune system includes the following teachings:

·       Doubt is a sign of weakness or temptation by Satan, the father of lies.

·       False teachers (those whose theology differs) should be cast out.

·       Believers should not be unequally yoked (partnered) with nonbelievers.

·       Nonbelievers have no basis for morality, so their motives are suspect.

·      If Christians act badly, the flaw is in the persons, not the religion.

 

Given that core beliefs are naturally resilient and given the power of messages such as these, it will come as no surprise that people go to extreme lengths psychologically to defend religious dogmas. 

 

Cognitive dissonance theory, helps us to understand what happens when people are confronted with contradictory beliefs.  If, for example, I believe the world is fair (called a Just World Hypothesis), but a kind, generous neighbor gets assaulted and hurt, I am faced with a contradiction.  I can revise my view of the world (it isn’t so fair), the neighbor (she isn’t so good), or the harm done (it wasn’t so bad).  Surprisingly often, people resolve such contradictions in favor of a treasured belief rather than in favor of the evidence—even if this requires blaming victims for their own suffering or coming up with elaborate justifications for catastrophes.  When the catastrophe is the apparent failure of a prophecy or the moral failure of a religious leader, such justifications can be spectacular.

 

In Doubting Jesus Resurrection, Kris Komarnitsky offers an nice overview of cognitive dissonance concepts followed by a series of jaw dropping stories from history – each showing the extreme contradictions believers can accommodate. Small apocalyptic cults suffer the devastating failure of end-of-the-world prophecies and yet each, faced with crushing disappointment, finds some interpretation that leaves the cult belief system intact. In this light, Komarnitsky examines the pressures faced by Jesus followers when his triumphal entry into Jerusalem was followed by torture and death.

 

A small close-knit cult fending adjusting to the disappointment of another ordinary sunrise is just an extraordinary example of ordinary – the human tendency toward confirmatory thinking.  All of us are biased to seek information that fits what we already believe.  Confirmatory evidence jumps out at us, and we find it emotionally appealing.  It’s like our minds set up filters – with contradictory evidence stuck in gray tones on the outside and the confirmatory evidence flowing through in bright and shining color. 

Unfortunately, confirmatory thinking causes all kinds of problems.  Corporate leaders fall into group think about the best competitive strategy.  Jurors assume an accused criminal is guilty.  Politicians fabricate reasons for war—sure that the real evidence must be there somewhere.  Confirmation bias is so built into human thinking that the whole scientific endeavor is structured essentially to get around it.  The scientific method has been called, “What we know about how not to fool ourselves.”  And yet, as we know, even scientists end up embarrassing themselves from time to time by getting a little to eager to confirm their pet theories and forgetting how easy it is to fall prey to our own filters. 

 

Even outside our personal information filters is a set of ring defenses:  our communities.  Who forwards you email?  What magazines do you subscribe to?  What shows do you watch?  Because confirmation is so satisfying and contradiction is so uncomfortable, we surround ourselves with friends and colleagues and coreligionists who think like us.  Often, we join groups that do the filtering for us:  Democrats for America, The Nature Conservancy, Assemblies of God, The National Rifle Association.  These groups provide a steady flow of information confirming and elaborating what we think we know—and ensuring that a lot of contradictory information never makes it anywhere near our brains. They let us short-cut.  Instead of weigh the quality of arguments and evidence – we look at the source and either raise or lower a draw bridge.

 

In an even more impervious form of this, we form a group identity:  I’m a Catholic. I’m a Republican. I’m an American. I’m a Woman. I’m Hispanic. I’m a Calvinist.  Each of these identities creates what I call a tribal information boundary (TIB).  TIB’s are remarkable efficiency devices, allowing us to weave coherent story lines about the world around us.  But for someone seeking to understand complicated realities, they can be tremendously costly.  People inside the tribe may be most able to help us refine our insider knowledge, but it is people outside the tribe who are most able to show us new vistas.

 

When we actually allow ourselves to bump up against the limitations of our world view, when we acknowledge we’ve hit a wall and then find a way over or around it—that is when growth is most likely to occur.  In the 1998 comedy, “The Truman Show,” the protagonist, played by Jim Carrey, pushes past an information boundary and realizes he is living in the artificial world of a television set.  From childhood, Truman has accepted the explanations and roles offered him.  But he is confronted with small discrepancies, and one day he ignores his own fears and barriers that his community has erected, punches through to the outside, and finds that there are familiar people there to welcome him. The movie’s message to us all:  It is possible.

 

Valerie Tarico is a psychologist and writer in Seattle, Washington.  She is the author of The Dark Side: How Evangelical Teachings Corrupt Love and Truth, and the founder of www.WisdomCommons.org

 

Recommended Books – See our list of books for liberals

 

Roy Morrison, 1997, We Build the Road as We Travel, Mondragon, a Cooperative Social System

 

Most of our free enterprises are capitalist, in which the ones who risk their capital are the sole owners.  Mondragon (in the Basque Region of Spain) presents an alternative form of free enterprise, in which the owners are ones who work for the enterprise.  Japan, Germany and other European countries have another form, in which a variety of stakeholders join providers of risk capital on their enterprise’s boards or directors.  In all these cases, owners are the decision makers, including decisions concerning the distribution of rewards and concerning short and long run objectives.

 

 

 

 

Free Member Advertising

 

Hire Our Lake Hills Neighbors

 

Barbara Rader of Black Widow Web Development created our Puget Sound Liberals Website, to which I (not a technical geek) can easily add, modify and remove files.  Learn more about this unique company, which offers a 50% discount for organizations that promote social justice and environmental stewardship.  Dave Thomas

·       Auto Repair, price varies depending on job (but always fair), Jaime Speicher (AAS Auto Repair Technician) (425-746-2353)

·       Babysitting for infants (occasional evenings and weekends) - $5 per hour- Christy Pacheco- johnpacheco01@yahoo.com  425-653-3565

·       Data Entry- $10 per 12 font, double spaced page- Christy Pacheco (425-653-3565 johnpacheco01@yahoo.com)

·       Debt Elimination Counseling, Seminars and Workshops – price negotiable – Sherry Brandt (206-356-8034, somerev2@comcast.net)

·       Home Repair- prices vary, depending on job- John Pacheco 425-653-3565 johnpacheco01@yahoo.com)

·       Home Repair and Remodeling, Rick Hegdahl (206-227-6280  vikingnw@comcast.net)

·       Housekeeper, price negotiable – Laura Montano (641-5038 ambar_lau@hotmail.com)

·       Life Support Therapies, Astara Burlingame RN. (MD) holistic care, acupuncture hypno therapy, biological medicines (206-370-0356)

·       Private Piano Lessons (students must have a piano), afternoons - Anna Khosrowian (378-7938), price negotiable

·       Psychotherapist, accepts insurance -  Sandy Mathews (462-7889, www.sandramathews.com)