Puget Sound Liberals Weekly Newsletter #186

Enhancing Freedom, Opportunity and Cooperation in Puget Sound and Beyond

Through informing and networking Liberals and Liberal Organizations.

 

Our vision is hundreds of thousands of well-informed Puget Sound Liberals working together.

 

          3500 members                              August 7, 2009                   formerly Lake Hills Liberals                

 

 

 

 

                                                     

Our Website                                   Our  Editor                  To Unsubscribe

 

    Table of Contents   * Featured Articles

 

About Puget Sound Liberals

Calendars of Events

Communication with Our Members

Leadership Toward Putting Public Interest First

 

Opportunities

Petitions

 

Commentaries from Our Members

Ross Gooding: Have You Read Obama’s HC Plan?

 

Liberals and Democrats Links to the Beef

Government Watch

Blue Dogs Are Liberals

F-22 Fighters, How our House Members Voted

 

State and Local Links to the Beef

Prevailing Loyalties, Politicians and Reformers**

BIAW’s Conservative Ideology**

HB 2261, a Legislative Power Grab**

Our Cautious Supreme Court Judges

Featured Advocacy Group: Progressive Democrats

KC Exec Candidates Should Cooperate after Primary*

Bellevue’s Neighborhood Link Program*

 

Nation and World Links to the Beef

How Much Is a Trillion Dollars?

How High Should Stock Market Indexes Go?

Chevron Advertisements Lie

Iran Protesters Use New Tactics

 

Our Liberal Spirit

Closeness to and Criticism of What We Care About*

 

Recommended Books

Democratic Party Recommendations for Local Races  For more.

 

 

 

Our Political Values

 

Our Political Priorities

 

·       Fair Clean Elections and Open Government

·       Fair Taxes and Competent Spending

·       Investment for Productivity

·       Quality Health, Education, Jobs, Income

·       Environmental Protection and Energy Independence

·       Security and Equal Rights

·       Justice and Peace Everywhere

·       International Cooperation and Leadership

 

Conservatives oppose all of these

 

     Let’s End Our National Nightmare

 

         Let’s Restore Our American Dream

 

 

More on Conservative opposition to our American Dream

 

Washington State’s 5 Major Needs

·       Federal Funding for Health and Education

·       Public Campaign Financing

·       Substituting a Progressive Income Tax

·       Replacing Conservative Legislators

·       Stopping Corporate Abuse

 

Quote of the Week

Familiarity Breeds Contempt.  Aesop’s Fable

 

Conversely –

No Man Can Be A Prophet in His Own Land.

Luke 4-24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Calendar of Events

Sunday, August 9 at 7:30 PM doors open, 10 PM show at Neighbors (1509 Broadway, Seattle) - Human Rights Campaign Out On the Town.

Monday, August 10 at 6 PM to Wednesday, August 12 at 12:30 PM at Pigott Hall, Seattle University (901 12th Avenue, Seattle)National Vacations Matter Summit, sponsored by right2vacation.  More than fifty national speakers exploring the health, productivity, family, environmental and spiritual benefits of vacation time, why Americans have less vacation time than people in any other industrial country and what we can do about it.  $50.  Students and low income $25.  To Register.  $120-180 for room for both nights, meals, and parking.  For more information.  I strongly recommend attendance at this event.  Dave Thomas

 

 

 

Calendars of Events                             

 

King County Democrats - LD Meetings            Some 2008 Legislature Lobby Days

Thurston County Progressive Net                  Western Washington Fellowship of Reconciliation

Alliance for Democracy                                Democratic Underground.Com                          

Sierra Club Cascade Chapter Calendar           Cool State Washington

Washington Public Campaigns Calendar          Town Hall Seattle Calendar

Washington State Labor Council                    Whatcom County Peace and Justice Calendar 

Conversation Cafe      Drinking Liberally          Seattle NOW          

Wallingford Neighbors for Peace and Justice – Friday Night Movies      Liberal films on PBS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Communication with Our Members

 

Leadership toward Putting Public Interests First

 

Washington should have a New Politics which is primarily oriented to enabling every Washington person to have access to quality services within a quality social and political environment.  Understanding what we must do to bring this about, I have decided to provide intellectual and educational leadership for altering our Washington politics to put public interests first.  

·       Our basic priority must always be to comprehensively understand and be true to our vision and its implications.

·       We need to address basic viruses instead of symptoms.  We must target major underlying obstacles.  The key logs in the log jam.  Once they are weakened or removed, we can more easily enable many specific reforms.

·       We need to focus our efforts on experimental projects that will succeed, will inform us, and will provide beacons to spread understanding of what we are about and why.

·       Our many Liberal advocacy organizations, such as our Democratic Party, labor unions, educational associations, environmental organizations, civil rights and poverty advocacy groups and many others, need to cooperate to create and implement solutions.

 

Our task will not be easy.  But I will suggest an initial thrust (to expose and test our major opponent) that may have surprising results.  We may be surprised at the vulnerabilities of our opponent.  And the resources and strengths that we can bring to bear.  It is time to quit playing only defense.  Doesn’t work in football or politics.

 

I hope you will read my analysis, contribute to it and join together to act upon it.  I hope that we not only win, but also learn and enjoy our adventure together.  Yes, we can.  I believe we will.  Dave Thomas

 

 

Opportunities

Useful Websites: contacts, maps, community organizing tools, and more.

Access to jillions of political cartoons.

Download Sightline Institute’s climate policy primer ‘Cap and Trade 101’.  About Sightline.

Create your own petition.

Conduct your own home energy audit.

See all of President Obama’s weekly (Saturday) addresses.

Open Congress: Race Tracker

 

Petitions

Tell your senators to support the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA).  Against GLBT people.

Tell Secretary of Homeland Security to quit harassing immigrants and create immigration reform.

Tell President Obama and your senators to strengthen the climate bill.

 

Commentaries From Our Members

 

Ross Gooding: Have You Read Obama’s Health Care Plan?

 

I notice your website/organization seems to support the administration’s proposed health plan—have you read over the entire plan and all of its detail?  Ross V. Gooding

 

Thanks for contacting me. I know President Obama’s general criteria and some other features.  I haven’t read the specific plan.  My comprehensive listing of challenges and objectives was presented in last week’s newsletter. I support health care reform with a robust public option which will evolve into a single-payer system, as more people switch from private health care insurance.

 

Our major challenge is to get the basics right.  But not let our disagreements over less important details become obstacles to passage.  Like Social Security and other major legislated programs, the health plan will be modified every few years as new realities and opportunities appear.   Let’s commit to progress, not perfection.   Dave Thomas

 

Liberals and Democrats

 

Government Watch

Also go to Whitehouse.gov.

 

Amazingly, President Obama hasn’t had any of his proposals blocked.  Many have already succeeded.  And luckily, trends in Iran and Bill Clinton’s trip to North Korea are in the right direction.  The toughest challenge may be the Israeli settlements in Palestine.

 

Health Care

We’ve spent 60 years trying to get universal health care.  Conservatives say that we’re going too fast.

Now they are claiming that encouraging people to prepare for their death is euthanasia.  Good grief!

This after claiming that our government will ration health care, when it’s primarily private health care insurers who are rationing health care to those who often lead it least.

 

Commercial media pundits thrive on drama.  If they arrived at a golden castle, they would quickly examine the walls for dents and look in the corners for mildew.   Highly complex health care reform has proceeded at unparalleled speed during the past few months.  Completely different from our 1994 health care reform attempt.

 

Yet the pundits emphasize every disagreement and every hesitation.  Will she or won’t she?  Will health care reform fail, due to this or that little reason?  Phooey.  It’s like watching the suspense of a low grade horror movie.  Let’s get real.  What’s happening is glorious sausage-making at its best.  Jillions of heroes reconciling jillions of issues.  Yes, we can.  Indeed, we are.

 

After 30 years of Conservative ascent to power and misbehavior, lots of Liberals have become afraid of their shadows.  I have decided that I’d rather be a Happy Warrior than a Nervous Nellie.  It was a long time coming; but, we outlived the rascals.  Some Liberals have become consumed with resentments and anger.  I’d rather be a Happy Warrior.

 

Health care reform bills are being refined and proceeding toward passage.  See the distribution of Republicans, Blue Dogs and other Democrats on House committees.  The last of three house committees have approved a health care reform bill, enabling a full house vote soon after returning from recess.  But Progressives disapprove of Blue Dog decision.  For more.  For more.

 

Six Finance Committee Senators who are delaying health care reform represent only 13 million (4% of our American people.  Senator Max Baucus can’t stop health care reform.  It will proceed without him.  For more.  For more.  For more.  Max Baucus says if Republicans can’t agree to a health reform bill by mid-September, he will proceed without them.   Should we have Term Limits for Senate Committee Chairs like Max Baucus?

 

60-70 percent of people support health care reform.  People are uneasy about various health care bills that they don’t understand.  Nancy Pelosi attacks private health insurers.  Health care reform opponents tell lies, lies and more lies.  For more.

 

Anti-health reform interests are organizing tea party type protests at congressional town meetings.  Tea Party Mobs disrupt Congress member’s town meetings to stop health care dialogue.  I wish I knew whether the disruptions with turn public opinion against health care reform or against its disrupting opponents.

 

Contract Administration

I viewed a congressional hearing on contract administration, which indicated that unlike the corrupt Bush administration, Defense, NASA, EPA and other departments are carefully creating and enforcing standards for contracted services.  President Obama has launched a badly needed initiative to reform the federal procurement process

 

Federal Reserve

Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke missed the boat.  He shouldn’t be reappointed in January.

 

Labor

Obama Administration whitehouse.gov website still fails to include labor among 29 issues.  Someone should be fired.  Why hasn’t labor expressed its outrage?

 

Diplomacy

Bill Clinton’s visit to North Korea yielded important results, freeing the captured Americans and showing respect that North Korean officials want.  This could be a step toward future negotiations.  This is important than was freeing the ship captain from Somali pirates.  It shows again the competence of President Obama to supplement Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with more specialized temporary and longer term envoys.

 

Military

U.S. troop withdrawals from Iraq may speed up.  

How about eliminating many empire-oriented foreign military bases for large savings.

 

Other Actions

Sonia Sotomayer joins a Conservative Court

Great Clunker Program success catches White House and Congress by surprise.  They do something right and then want to mess with it to save money.

House approves measure to improve food safety.

 

Blue Dogs Are Liberals

 

See the distribution of Republicans, Blue Dogs and other Democrats on House committees.

 

National public television’s evening news recently referred to Blue Dogs as Conservative Democrats, as opposed to most other Democrats who are Liberal.  I disagree.  I believe that Blue Dogs are also Liberal.  They also want our Liberal Priorities.

 

The media pundits continually refer to Blue Dogs as Southern and Border State Democrats who must appeal to Conservative constituencies.  But as I reported before, Blue Dogs are widely distributed throughout our states.  What most distinguishes them is their fiscal caution.  Their major request is Pay-Go, which avoids deficits and increased debt. 

 

Blue Dogs are also accused serving private interests, in return for financial support.  But congress members of all stripes do this and not obviously less.  On the cap and trade climate control bill and the health reform bill, Blue dogs have been particularly protective of their businesses and people back home.  They have insisted on fair instead of simply effective solutions.  For example, they might argue that West Virginia (which much less-carbon based energy production than Washington) would be penalized much more, unless the penalties are phased in.  The question is whether the climate emergency so important that we can proceed unfairly.

 

Similarly on health care.  Wrenching changes in financial rewards are coming.  Should some health providers, small businesses and areas be excused or given more time?  I credit the Blue Dogs for their emphasis upon cost saving and their concern for fairness.  They won’t stop health care reform.  I think Blue Dogs are contributing to its betterment.  Dave Thomas

 

F-22 Fighters, How our House Members Voted

 

After unsuccessfully browsing to learn how our Washington Democratic congressmen voted concerning extension of production of the F-22 fighter plans, I phoned their offices.  None of their staff knew without researching it.  I spent about 3 hours to learn that Brian Baird, Norm Dicks, Rick Larsen, Adam Smith and Jim McDermott all voted against extension.  I never could find out what Jay Inslee did.  Dave Reichert also voted against it.  So only our two Senators favored extension of this totally wasteful program.  For more.    For more.

 

Unfortunately, the house approved more presidential helicopters and other wasteful programs that President Obama and Defense Secretary Gates opposed.  And there’s still huge amount of waste that no one has yet challenged.  For more.  Having saved $1.75 billion by refusing to buy more F-22 fighters, congress added $9 billion in pork spending for items the Defense Department doesn’t want.

 

Here’s the Beef

President Obama allows mountain top coal mining to continue.

Anti-abortionists are splitting between those who support and oppose contraception.

Soon, the only Republicans left will be lunatics.  The others are leaving.

Bye Bye Republican Senators.

Arlen Specter faces opposition in Democratic primary.

 

State and Local

 

Prevailing Loyalties, Politicians and Reformers

 

I met Norm Conrad at an Organizing for America meeting.  Being both booklovers, we met to give each other books.  One of the books he gave me was Lawrence Goodwyn, 1976, The Populist Moment, A Short History of the Agrarian Revolt in America, recommended in last week’s newsletter.  Its description of the rise and fall of the Populist Movement of the 1880s has dominated my thoughts about creating a New Public Interest Politics in Washington today.

 

There are both similarities and differences between our situation today and that of 120 years ago.  While much can be learned from studying the Populist Movement, we must adapt many of their strategies and tactics to our very different potential allies and technologies for reaching them.

 

Prevailing Loyalties

Prevailing loyalties in the 1880s stemmed from the Civil War.  The Grand Army of the Republic (Republican) in the northern states and the Democrats in the southern states.  To attract members, Populists had to lure people from these party loyalties.  A really tough job, but one with which they had mixed success.  Similarly today, loyalties are to Republicans and Democrats stemming from long struggles dating from the 1930’s New Deal.

 

Reformers

As illustrated by the Populists, reformers orient toward creating a new political consciousness.  They reframe political objectives.  They seek to replace prevailing loyalties.  They do this through organizing experimental demonstration projects, learning about their opponents, refining their ideology (including basic priorities) and spreading the word.  In doing these, Populists were extremely successful.  They built a large base, especially in Texas and throughout the South.

 

Potential Allies

The Populist Movement grew from the oppression of farmers by the eastern banking establishment which denied them capital, except at ruinous cost.  Their proposals included crucially the creating of Greenback paper currency, controlled by the government, instead of gold or silver controlled by the banking establishment. 

 

To implement Greenback capital, Populists had to elect candidates.  To become nationally strong, Populists needed to reach out to potential allies: black southern farmers, Midwestern and Western interests, newly developing labor unions, northern urban political machine served Catholics and later Eugene Debs’ socialists.  They made overtures toward all these groups.

 

But this was not possible.  Racism divided blacks and whites.  Labor unions had not developed a populist ideology.  They remained weak until the New Deal.  Midwestern interests were not primarily oriented to farm poverty or securing control of capital.  Western interests promoted Silver instead of Greenbacks.  Socialists were not receptive to grass roots movements.  Where fusion and other strategies were tried, Populists were pressured to forsake their own priorities, resulting in weakening their movement.

 

Politicians

Reformers focus upon creating a new consciousness through successful demonstration projects, grass roots organizing and spreading their ideology.  These were the keys to Populist success in rapidly creating their movement.  Politicians focus upon winning elections now.  Most politicians (especially successful ones) are unwilling to espouse a new consciousness for the long run.  Most would rather win elections by appearing as moderates.  The same is true today.  Our Washington Democratic Party actively counsels and assists their candidates and elected officials to appear less Liberal than they are.

 

When using Fusion strategies to support Democratic politicians, Populists found that the politicians gave Populist objectives only enough lip service to gain their support.  Upon winning, these Fusion-supported politicians ignored Populist objectives.  For Populists, fusion was both necessary to win politically and suicidal to maintaining their basic integrity.

 

William Jennings Bryan and the Silver Democrats dominated the challenge to the established Gold Republicans.  Using oodles of business establishment campaign contribution, Mark Hanna created campaigns which beat the Democrats.  Democrats lost elections.  Having no place to go politically, unable to advance toward Greenback extension of capital, Populists faded as a political movement.

 

Lessons for Reformers Today

We face most of the same challenges that the Populists faced:

·       What projects or programs can we create which we can demonstrate to others?  Through developing these projects, how can we clarify and elaborate our basic values, our opponents, our priorities and proposals? 

·       How can we spread the word?  (Today’s technology allows and requires us to replace traveling lecturers with internet communication.) 

·       How can we work with allies (environmentalists, health care advocates, educators, labor, and a variety of civil rights, ethnic, poverty, housing and other advocacy groups) who often have specific priorities with which we must meld ours.

 

I have developing thoughts, but no confident answers to these questions.  I will explore them in future commentaries.  I strongly invite your assistance.  Your imaginative tentative thoughts.  Our primary project now may be to create ways to work together. 

 

As with the Populists, I believe our basic strength must be our ideology.  Our understanding or our values, our situation, our opponents, and or priorities.  I believe that our basic value is to grant each of Washington’s people access to quality infrastructure and safety net service.  Our basic priority is to create a New Public Interest Politics to replace our Old Private Interest Politics.  These are our starting principles, our basic foundation and must never be forsaken or even deemphasized. 

 

We must next address our social and political vehicle for driving change.  What projects do we want to begin?  Maybe shooting some legal and other shots across the bow of our opponents, to learn how our various groups can work together.  We will need to figure a way for financing our activities.  More on this next week.  Please send me your ideas.  Dave Thomas.

 

Corazon Aquino, who became President of the Philippines as the result of the 1986 people’s power revolt, has died.  Four years later, I made seven community development trips to the Philippines for a total of 12 months there.  The spontaneous uprising removed Ferdinand Marcus, but didn’t change the domination of Philippine politics by the wealthy, powerful and corrupt.  The Philippines continues as perhaps the least developing East Asian-Pacific country.  Dave Thomas

 

BIAW’s Conservative Ideology

 

The Building Association of Washington (BIAW) openly expresses its Reagan Conservative ideology, especially concerning our Washington State government.  Anti-taxes.  Anti-government spending (big government).  Anti-government regulation.  BIAW specifically expresses:

 “The Building Industry Association of Washington exists to unite those in the building industry in Washington State in their fight against a government that has made this industry among the most regulated in the nation.”

“Besides battling big government, BIAW offers a variety of programs and services that can help put your business on top.”

 

The one exception is its support for government spending upon building construction.  It opposes spending for everything else.  It opposes especially those regulations which would affect construction: environmental restrictions (such as our growth management act) and worker and consumer rights, including accountability for quality construction.

 

BIAW primarily expresses Conservative views concerning economic issues.  The Washington Policy Center and Evergreen Freedom Foundation (which it supports) elaborates these.  But it also embraces Conservative positions on social issues, in its embrace of Conservative commercial media pundits and talk radio shows.

 

BIAW’s Conservative ideology wouldn’t matter much if it didn’t have the financial resources to effectively pursue it.  But it has enough resources to greatly support Washington’s Conservative political infrastructure, to politically affect the election and voting of our legislators, to legally challenge regulations, and to protect its revenue.  Often successfully, as they note in their Building Insight newsletters.

 

This combination of ideology and financial resources provides the largest single obstacle to maintaining and improving our State government’s capacity to serve our people.  To protect our government and people, we must refute BIAW’s ideology and politically separate it from its member base and financing.

 

HB 2261, a Legislative Power Grab

 

Our 1889 Washington State constitution expressed that the State must:

·       Adequately fund public education for all children

·       Provide a uniform system of schools

·       Utilize a uniform tax system to fund them

Ever since, our major challenges have been how to detail and meet these three criteria. 

 

Until 1943, public schools received state funding which was adequate, fairly raised and fairly distributed.  From 1944 to 1974, State funding was reduced, supplemented by local levies, which increased from 5% to 32% of funding.  When levies failed, schools received inadequate funding. 

 

Teachers and taxpayers revolted to restore State funding.  Under pressure from the public and courts, our legislature enacted the Levy Lid Act and Basic Education Act (BEA), which specified amount of class room instruction and a student/teacher ratio.  A court also ruled that state revenue problems can not be used as an excuse to reduce funding below that necessary to adequately fund education. In 1980, Washington was 11th in the nation in school funding.  In 1997, Washington was still above average.

 

In 2000, 72% of Washington voters approved Initiative 728 which designated certain state revenues to achieve such goals as reducing class sizes, increasing teacher pay.  But due to non-specificity, our legislature was able to largely ignore them, especially after facing a severe revenue shortfall in 2004.

 

In 2005, ESSB 5441 Washington Learns recommended adequate funding, but failed to indicate any adequate and stable source of such funding.  In 2007, a broad-based coalition filed a lawsuit to force the state to comply with the constitution.  A court decision has been delayed.

 

                                              School Funding as % of Washington Income

While other states have been increasing their funding of education as a percent of their income (yellow dots), Washington has markedly decreased ours (pink dots) almost every year, during both better and worse economic conditions.  And while many tax exemptions have been granted to businesses and wealthy people. 

 

 

 

 

 

Washington now ranks 43rd in school funding and 46th in class sizes.  School funding has declined significantly as a percentage of state spending, which has declined as a percentage of our state’s total disposable income.  Including the 2009 budget cuts, we are now about $2,000 per pupil below the national average.  Teacher’s pay has declined compared to elsewhere.

 

We rank 50th concerning the percentage of our 8th graders who graduate from college, leaving them unprepared for developing their careers.  To recruit employees, our Hi Tech companies are forced to bringing better trained applicants from out-of State.  Both our children and economy suffer when we shortchange our public schools.

 

Our legislature passed HB 2261 in 2009, which presented a vision of equitable education, but eliminated a student/teacher ratio and other specific criteria.  HB 2261 provides that the legislature will decide how much to fund each year.  Thus the constitution and courts are ignored.  School funding was reduced by $1 billion.  If federal stimulus funds aren’t available during coming years, school funding may continue to decline.

 

It remains to be seen whether Constitution will continue to be violated.  Will our courts or the legislature win the struggle to set and meet standards?  If the legislature wins, our education will continue to be inadequate or worsen, regardless of the best efforts of our school administrators and other staff, especially if the federal stimulus-recovery education funds are a one-shot deal.  If the courts win, the legislature will face the difficult task of raising and allocating the necessary money.  For more.

 

Our Cautious Supreme Court Judges

 

Our Supreme Court Judges aren’t as Conservative as wanted by those who unsuccessfully spent large amounts to replace them.  But they aren’t Liberal either.  As evidenced by their rejecting same-sex marriage for the ridiculous reason that marriage is all about having children.  Similarly, they have delayed their decision concerning fully funding schools to meet specific criteria.  And have delayed their decision concerning the recovery of state disability insurance funds that BIAW has received illegally for many years.

 

This caution works to the advantage of Conservatives.  Delays allow them to continue to deny people’s rights.  To reduce our state government’ revenues and expenditures necessary to serve our people.  Liberal reforms would be greatly served by recruiting less cautious Supreme Court judges.  Dave Thomas

 

Featured Advocacy Group --- Progressive Democrats of America----------------

 

Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) was founded in 2004 to transform the Democratic Party and our country. We seek to build a party and government controlled by citizens, not corporate elites -- with policies that serve the broad public interest, not just private interests. As a grassroots PAC operating inside the Democratic Party, and outside in movements for peace and justice, PDA played a key role in the stunning electoral victory of November 2006. Our inside/outside strategy is guided by the belief that a lasting majority will require a revitalized Democratic Party built on firm progressive principles.

 

For over two decades, the party declined as its leadership listened more to the voices of Wall Street than those of Main Street. PDA strives to rebuild the Democratic Party from the bottom up – from every Congressional District to statewide party structures to the corridors of power in Washington, where we work arm in arm with the Congressional Progressive Caucus. In just a couple of years, PDA and its allies have shaken up the political status quo – on issues from the Iraq war to voter rights to economic justice.

 

To reach these goals, PDA will:

·       Work inside the Democratic Party to return it to its roots as the party that represents the workers and the less fortunate

·       Build coalitions outside the Democratic Party on shared issues.

·       Establish chapters in all 435 congressional districts to create an information and action conduit that allows us to effectively organize in response to or in support of congressional actions. 

·       Work with the Congressional Progressive Caucus to support and bring forward progressive legislation on the core issues identified by our PDA chapters

 

Chapters are being established in each of Washington’s congressional districts.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Four KC Exec Candidates Should Cooperate to Beat an Unqualified One

 

An unqualified candidate will likely win the most primary votes.  The three doing 3rd, 4th and 5th should immediately lend their full support to the one who comes in second: endorsements, fund raising, phone calls to influential friends, canvassing volunteers and more.  The ones who do this will serve King County and our people and be well respected for their actions.

 

Bellevue’s Neighborhood Link Program

 

When neighbors get to know each other, they can prevent crime, assist disaster victims, and protect and support children.  Our Bellevue city government has initiated a Neighborhood Link Program that provides assistance projects which enable neighbors to better get to know and care for their neighborhood and each other.  One of the greatest ideas I’ve seen.  Every community should experiment with this.  Dave Thomas

 

Here’s the Beef

Washington state Labor says bye bye to Democrats.

Washington’s low income people are denied justice, due to insufficient funding for legal aid.

Washington State Community Action Agencies Awarded 11.7 million in stimulus-recovery Funds

Compared to a year ago, bankruptcies in Washington have increased 52%.

Using state stimulus funds, Washington housing agencies will weatherize 7,000 low income homes.

2,550 electric vehicle charging stations in our Seattle area will be funded by Stimulus-Recovery funds.

Federal court bans new roads in 40 million acres of national forests, including 2 million in Washington.

Logging beats paving.

Greenpeace pressures Kimberly-Clark to quit using old growth timber to create Kleenix.

Our government makes it difficult for farmers to hire undocumented workers.

Make your food interesting by learning its history.

 

Nation and World  

 

How Much Is a Trillion Dollars?

 

Our U.S. population totals 304 million.  Dividing that into a billion gives us about $3.30 per person.  Dividing that into a trillion gives us about $3,300 per person.  Stock market values and housing values each dropped $7 trillion for $23,000 person for a total of $46,000 per person.  Some of us lost much more.  Most of us lost much less. 

 

We can perform similar calculations for our 113 million households and 156.3 income tax filers.  With the results, we can compare the cost of letting our economy stay depressed with stimulating it.  How long would it take us to lose our share of a trillion dollars if our house value declines, our stock values decline or we lose our job?

 

How High Should Stock Market Indexes Go?

 

Amidst alternative investments, stock prices should reflect present earnings, potential growth (in earnings) and risk.  The Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio indicates whether future earnings are expected to increase.  Growth industries have larger P/E ratios compared to stable industries compared to declining industries.

 

During bubbles, when irrational exuberance and infectious greed abound, prices and P/E ratios soar.  When the bubble pops, they decline.  Our stock market indexes increased during the bubble.  Then declined sharply.  And now have gained back a third of their loss.  Hopefully, we will not create another speculative bubble to again reach the peak.

 

Ideally, we would experience a steadily growing economy, based on producing goods and services, instead of upon financial speculation.  Hopefully, it will contain more (caring) services and fewer products that impact our environment through their production and use.  We would be glad to see the stock market gradually reach its previous peak and beyond in this way.  It would be a steady increase, not the rapid one that occurred during our bubbles. 

 

Chevron Advertisements Lie

 

Chevron ads appearing on public television say that responding to climate change is not a question of ideology.  “We don’t need a Liberal or Conservative solution; we need to use all forms of energy.” 

 

What a colossal lie.  Chevron’s solution is Conservative.  With the other oil companies, they denied the climate problem and now just want to use more energy of all kinds, including carbon based energy.  Like Senator John McCain, Chevron wants to drill, drill, drill.

 

Iran Protesters Use New Tactics

 

Protesters identify their attackers and paint ‘X’s in front of their homes.  Instead of large rallies, they improvise lots of small dispersed ones which fade away when attackers arrive.  They boycott government goods and services.  The authorities won’t be able to put the genie back in the bottle.

 

Here’s the Beef

While we deal with our bubbles, China just keeps on developing.

U.S. compares poorly with other countries concerning support for small businesses.

Financial Inequality harms societies.

Allow judicial mortgage alteration or bring back bankruptcy.

38 companies participating in our government loan modification program are modifying only a few.  For more.  For more.

Here come the robots.  Bye bye human baseball.

Bye bye manual competence.

It easier for atheists to stay in the closet in our southern bible belt.

Seven reasons why we need to pass the Internet Freedom Preservation Act to preserve net neutrality.

Utah shows that the four-day week has many advantages for budgets and workers.

After as much as 79 weeks of unemployment, 1.5 million will soon exhaust their benefits.

Unemployed people are choosing to become teachers.

People die because medicines have too much patent protection.

Chemical manufacturers support updating the Toxic Substances Control Act.

People throughout the world place a high priority upon addressing climate change.

There are many reasons to eliminate many of our empire oriented military bases.

To overcome religious sectarian animosities, Iraqi government pays for mixed marriages.

 

Our Liberal Spirit

 

Closeness to and Criticism of What We Care About

 

I often make snap judgments.  They are usually wrong.  Sometimes very wrong.  They change rapidly as I get to know a group or person better.  I come to understand and admire their strengths and virtues.  I also become more critical of them.

 

I am a Democrat.  But some mornings I wake up so disgusted that I’m an independent.  I have had a similar experience with every group with which I have been intimately associated from the Boy Scouts to the Order Ecumenical. 

 

Most of all, my appreciation and criticism appears when I wake up to look in the mirror.  Over 72 years, I have come to know me pretty well.  I have some great features, but I have others that aren’t pretty.  My major tension in life is between using my strengths well, while not letting my defects get in the way.  Not letting them harm myself and others.   

 

Realizing this tension, I am comfortable with myself, warts and all.  I am what I am.  There is nothing to be gained from shutting down because I’m not something else.  I attempt to change or at least temper my defects, but not at the expense of using my strengths.  Dave Thomas

 

Recommended Books – See our list of books for liberals

Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, 1986, Democracy and Capitalism: Property, Community, and the Contradictions of Modern Social Thought

 

I suspect few people share my fascination with theoretical analyses of our Liberalism, grounded in the history of our Liberalism.  This book is an examination of the evolving differences between Liberalism, Marxism and Grassroots Democracy ideologies.  In doing so, it describes many political and economic movements.