Puget Sound Liberals Weekly Newsletter #214

Enhancing Freedom, Opportunity and Cooperation in Puget Sound and Beyond

Through informing and networking Liberals and Liberal Organizations.

 

Our vision is hundreds of thousands of well-informed Puget Sound Liberals working together.

 

          3500 members                            February 19, 2009                formerly Lake Hills Liberals                

 

 

 

 

                                                     

Our Website                                   Our  Editor                  To Unsubscribe

 

              Table of Contents    * Featured Articles

 

About Puget Sound Liberals

Calendars of Events

Communication with Our Members

My Paradigm Shift

Opportunities

Petitions

 

Commentaries from Our Members

Tom Cramer: Dave Reichert Again Supports Wall Street over Main Street

Ray McBain: Commentary Indicates 2 Necessary Actions

 

Liberals and Democrats Links to the Beef

Michelle Obama Launches Anti-Obesity Campaign*

President Obama Promotes Bipartisan Jobs Bill

Neither Congressional Republicans or Democrats Are Consistently Liberal

If I Could Dictate Fiscally Responsible Reforms**

 

State and Local Links to the Beef

State Legislators Fail to Pass Two Important Bills

 

Nation and World Links to the Beef

Value of Dollar and Cost of Oil

Featured Advocacy Group: Avaaz.org

 

Our Liberal Spirit

My Paradigm Shift*

 

Recommended Books

 

 

 

 

Our Political Values

 

Our Political Priorities

 

·       Fair Clean Elections and Open Government

·       Fair Taxes and Competent Spending

·       Investment for Productivity

·       Quality Health, Education, Jobs, Income

·       Environmental Protection and Energy Independence

·       Security and Equal Rights

·       Justice and Peace Everywhere

·       International Cooperation and Leadership

 

Conservatives oppose all of these

 

     Let’s End Our National Nightmare

 

         Let’s Restore Our American Dream

 

More on Conservative opposition to our American Dream

 

Washington State’s 5 Major Needs

·       Federal Funding for Health and Education

·       Public Campaign Financing

·       Substituting a Progressive Income Tax

·       Replacing Conservative Legislators

·       Stopping Corporate Abuse

 

Quote of the Week

New Information may require a Paradigm Shift.  Thomas Kuhn

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Calendar of Events

 

 

Saturday, February 20 at 5:30 (Family Session), 8 Pm and 10:30 PM at West Seattle Bowl (3505 - 39th Avenue SW, Seattle) - 8th Annual Bowled and Beautiful (food and bowling in support of LGBT human rights campaign). $35.  To register.

Saturday, February 27 at 7 - 10 PM at Lakeland Hills Community Center (5801 Lakeland Hills Way SE, Auburn) - Progressives on the Plateau celebration and political discussion hosted by 31st LD Democrats. $25 single.  $40 couple.  To register.

Saturday, February 27 at 7 PM at University of Washington Kane Hall room 120 - Health Care for All forum.  For more.

 

 

 

Calendars of Events                             

 

King County Democrats - LD Meetings            Some 2008 Legislature Lobby Days

Thurston County Progressive Net                  Western Washington Fellowship of Reconciliation

Alliance for Democracy                                Democratic Underground.Com                          

Sierra Club Cascade Chapter Calendar           Cool State Washington

Washington Public Campaigns Calendar          Town Hall Seattle Calendar

Washington State Labor Council                    Whatcom County Peace and Justice Calendar 

Conversation Cafe      Drinking Liberally          Seattle NOW           

Wallingford Neighbors for Peace and Justice – Friday Night Movies      Liberal films on PBS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Communication with Our Members

 

 

My Paradigm Shift

 

About a month ago, I experienced a paradigm shift from believing that because Barack Obama had such an excellent political strategy for winning the presidency, he must also have an effective strategy for passing reform measures and winning congressional seats this fall.  I shifted to believing that President Obama’s strategy has been flawed in not clearly demonstrating that he favors Main Street over Wall Street and favors fiscal responsibility.  He has not called the Republican bluff that they favor Main Street over Wall Street and fiscal responsibility when they favor the opposite. 

 

I now believe that President Obama should have immediately regulated Wall Street and immediately raised the money for stimulating jobs from wealthy speculators and through eliminating wasted military and other spending.  He could have done this to the extent politically possible while quickly starting his efforts to obtain health care reform.  On health care reform, he should have given Max Baucus a strict deadline for obtaining Republican support, so that many months would not wasted, risking the loss of 60 Senatorial Democratic votes.

 

I have not changed my paradigm entirely.  I still believe that President Obama has time to take actions that he should have taken long ago, such that Republican hypocrisy is revealed and many tea baggers realize that they should be more concerned about Republicans than Democrats, with the result that as many or more congressional Democrats are seated this fall. 

 

As before, I believe that even a little job recovery to lower unemployment to 8 or 9% will influence voters to support Democrats and that such job recovery will occur as startups and small businesses search feverishly and find the credit that they need, perhaps from relatives and friends.

 

Opportunities

Useful Websites: contacts, maps, community organizing tools, and more.

Obtain a free ‘Corporations Are Not People’ bumper sticker.

 

Petitions

Tell President Obama to make recess appointments to fill National Labor Relations Board.

Tell Anthem Blue Cross to explain its 39% rate increase.

Tell Senate Majority leader Harry Reid to include a public option in a reconciliation bill.

Tell your state legislators to protect Washington children from BPA in sports water bottles.

Tell the National Marine Fisheries Service to protect the endangered beluga whale.

Tell Governor Gregoire to address pollution for our largest coal fired power plant.

Tell Ugandan leaders to oppose anti-gay law.

 

Commentaries From Our Members

 

Tom Cramer: Dave Reichert Again Supports Wall Street over Main Street

 

Conservative Republican Dave Reichert voted against HR4173, a bill to regulate Wall Street. Even after millions of people lost their jobs, homes, and financial security, Dave Reichert is working hard to protect Wall Street. The act would have changed Wall Street and made them pay for their financial crimes and abuse. Middle class Americans paid to bailout Wall Street with their taxes and are continuing to pay through a growing deficit with people out of work and reduced tax revenues. We, our children, and our grandchildren, will continue to pay for Wall Street's abuses with our taxes, long-term job loss, and a reduced standard of living for many years to come.  Economists are calling it a new normal. I call it a new abnormal.

 

Dave Reichert's friends on Wall Street are being protected. They have recovered with record profits! I want to represent the people in the 8th Congressional District and defend them from Wall Street's abuses of power and my opponent's protection of Wall Street's status quo of stealing the people's money and their future. I want to create jobs now and cut Main Street's taxes in half. I want to represent the Main Street middle class from Wall Street's abuses and the people, like Dave Reichert, who work for them.

 

Sincerely, Tom Cramer, A Main Street, Middle Class Guy Who Wants to Fight for You!

 

Ray McBain: Robert Kuttner’s Commentary Indicates 2 Necessary Actions

 

If Democrats can start sounding like Democrats again, they'll have a better shot at holding onto their majority in Congress next November. And if they do keep their majority, they should do two things to turn themselves into a legislative party that can actually do the people's business.

 

First, scrap the filibuster rule. It isn't written into the Constitution, and in its modern form it only dates to 1975, when the Senate changed the rules to permit a single senator to require a supermajority of 60 votes on a given measure simply by threatening to hold the floor indefinitely, even if the senator couldn't be bothered to show up.  Before that rule change, you actually had to keep talking and tie up the Senate in order to filibuster. Today, you need only to declare your intent to filibuster, and any measure can be made to require 60 votes. As a consequence, the number of filibustered bills every session has risen from around 7 before 1975 to about 100.

 

Second, dump committee chairmen who are laws unto themselves.  In the next Congress, unless the Democrats lose their majority, somebody other than Baucus should chair the Finance Committee.  Tim Johnson should not be appointed to replace Banking Committee Chair Christ Dodd.  Read the entire commentary.  Ray McBain

 

Liberals and Democrats

 

Michelle Obama Launches Anti-Obesity Campaign

 

Health care reform requires three major actions:

·       Eliminating the participation of employers and for-profit private health insurers.  Paying for health care insurance renders employers uncompetitive with foreign employers who don’t have health care costs.  Private for-profit health insurers are motivated to provide as little coverage as possible for as much money as possible.

·       Reducing the costs of health care by ensuring that every patient has a primary care doctor who coordinates care by specialists and paying for patient outcomes instead of procedures

·       Reducing unhealthy lifestyle habits such as obesity and smoking that increase illness.

 

The flawed health reform bills passed by the Senate and House do little with respect to these needed actions, especially the latter.

 

Michelle Obama has been a superb wife and mother as well being concerned with services for military families and with encouraging healthy lifestyles.  While Conservatives have constantly attacked President Obama for being everything bad, they have not attacked Michelle.

 

Michelle Obama has now mounted a major campaign to reduce obesity.  This includes participation by communities, schools and parents to exclude eating of fattening foods and stimulate eating of healthy foods and increased exercise.  This campaign assembles a large coalition of these types of participants while requiring little government action.  It includes:

Helping Parents Make Healthy Family Choices
Parents play a key role in making healthy choices for their children and teaching their children to make healthy choices for themselves.  But in today’s busy world, this isn’t always easy.  So Let’s Move will offer parents the tools, support and information they need to make healthier choices for their families.  The Administration, along with partners in the private sector and medical community, will:

Empower Consumers:   By the end of this year, the Food and Drug Administration will begin working with retailers and manufacturers to adopt new nutritionally sound and consumer friendly front-of-package labeling.  This will put us on a path towards 65 million parents in America having easy access to the information needed to make healthy choices for their children.

Already, the private sector is responding.  Today, the American Beverage Association announced that its member companies will voluntarily put a clear, uniform, front-of-pack calorie label on all of their cans, bottles, vending and fountain machines within two years. The label will reflect total calories per container in containers up to 20oz. in size.  For containers greater than 20 oz., the label will reflect a 12 oz. serving size.  While more work remains to be done, this marks an important first step in ensuring parents have the information they need to make healthier choices

Provide Parents with a Rx for Healthier Living:    The American Academy of Pediatrics, in collaboration with the broader medical community, will educate doctors and nurses across the country about obesity, ensure they regularly monitor children’s BMI, provide counseling for healthy eating early on, and, for the first time ever, will even write a prescription for parents laying out the simple things they can do to increase healthy eating and active play.

Major New Public Information Campaign:   Major media companies – including the Walt Disney Company, NBC, Universal and Viacom – have committed to join the First Lady’s effort and increase public awareness of the need to combat obesity through public service announcements (PSAs), special programming, and marketing. The Ad Council, Warner Brothers and Scholastic Media have also partnered with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to run PSAs featuring top professional athletes, Scholastic Media’s Maya & Miguel, and Warner Brothers’ legendary Looney Tunes characters.

Next Generation Food Pyramid:  To help people make healthier food and physical activity choices, the U.S. Department of Agriculture will revamp the famous food pyramid.  MyPyramid.gov is one of the most popular websites in the federal government, and a 2.0 version of the Web site will offer consumers a host of tools to help them put the Dietary Guidelines into practice. 

Empower Change:  USDA has created the first-ever interactive database – the Food Environment Atlas – that maps healthy food environments at the local level across the country.  It will help people identify the existence of food deserts, high incidences of diabetes, and other conditions in their communities.  This information can be used by parents, educators, government and businesses to create change across the country. 

LetsMove.gov:  To help children parents, teachers, doctors, coaches, the non-profit and business communities and others understand the epidemic of childhood obesity and take steps to combat it, the Administration has launched a new “one-stop” shopping website -- LetsMove.gov -- to provide helpful tips, step-by-step strategies for parents, and regular updates on how the federal government is working with partners to reach the national goal.  

Serving Healthier Food in Schools 
Many children consume as many as half of their daily calories at school.  As families work to ensure that kids eat right and have active play at home, we also need to ensure our kids have access to healthy meals in their schools.  With more than 31 million children participating in the National School Lunch Program and more than 11 million participating in the National School Breakfast Program, good nutrition at school is more important than ever.  Together with the private sector and the non-profit community, we will take the following steps to get healthier food in our nation’s schools:   

Reauthorize the Child Nutrition Act: The Administration is requesting an historic investment of an additional $10 billion over ten years starting in 2011 to improve the quality of the National School Lunch and Breakfast program, increase the number of kids participating, and ensure schools have the resources they need to make program changes, including training for school food service workers, upgraded kitchen equipment, and additional funding for meal reimbursements.  With this investment, additional fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and low-fat dairy products will be served in our school cafeterias and an additional one million students will be served in the next five years.   

Double the number of schools participating in the Healthier US School Challenge:  The Healthier US School Challenge establishes rigorous standards for schools’ food quality, participation in meal programs, physical activity, and nutrition education – the key components that make for healthy and active kids – and provides recognition for schools that meet these standards. Over the next school year, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, working with partners in schools and the private sector, will double the number of schools that meet the Healthier US School Challenge and add 1,000 schools per year for two years after that.  

We are bringing to the table key stakeholder groups that have committed to work together to improve the nutritional quality of school meals across the country.

New Commitments from Major School Food Suppliers:  School food suppliers are taking important first steps to help meet the Healthier US School Challenge goal. Major school food suppliers including Sodexho, Chartwells School Dining Services, and Aramark have voluntarily committed to meet the Institute of Medicine’s recommendations within five years to decrease the amount of sugar, fat and salt in school meals; increase whole grains; and double the amount of produce they serve within 10 years.  By the end of the 2010-2011 school year, they have committed to quadruple the number of the schools they serve that meet the Healthier US School Challenge.

School Nutrition Association:  The School Nutrition Association (SNA), which represents food service workers in more than 75% of the nation’s schools, has joined the Let’s Move campaign. Working with other education partners, SNA has committed to increasing education and awareness of the dangers of obesity among their members and the students they serve, and ensuring that the nutrition programs in 10,000 schools meet the Healthier US School Challenge standards over the next five years.

School Leadership:  Working with school food service providers and SNA, the National School Board Association, the Council of Great City Schools and the American Association of School Administrators Council have all embraced, and committed to meeting, the national Let’s Move goal.  The Council of Great City Schools has also has set a goal of having every urban school meet the Healthier US Schools gold standard within five years.  The American Association of School Administrators has committed to ensuring that an additional 2,000 schools meet the challenge over the next two years.  These combined efforts will touch 50 million students and their families in every school district in America.

Accessing Healthy, Affordable Food
More than 23 million Americans, including 6.5 million children, live in low-income urban and rural neighborhoods that are more than a mile from a supermarket. These communities, where access to affordable, quality, and nutritious foods is limited, are known as food deserts.  Lack of access is one reason why many children are not eating recommended levels of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. And food insecurity and hunger among children is widespread.  A recent USDA report showed that in 2008, an estimated 49.1 million people, including 16.7 million children, lived in households that experienced hunger multiple times throughout the year. The Administration, through new federal investments and the creation of public private partnerships, will: 

Eliminate Food Deserts:  As part of the President’s proposed FY 2011 budget, the Administration announced the new Healthy Food Financing Initiative – a partnership between the U.S. Departments of Treasury, Agriculture and Health and Human Services that will invest $400 million a year to help bring grocery stores to underserved areas and help places such as convenience stores and bodegas carry healthier food options.  Through these initiatives and private sector engagement, the Administration will work to eliminate food deserts across the country within seven years. 

Increase Farmers Markets: The President’s 2011 Budget proposes an additional $5 million investment in the Farmers Market Promotion Program at the U.S. Department of Agriculture which provides grants to establish, and improve access to, farmers markets.

Increasing Physical Activity
Children need 60 minutes of active play each day.  Yet, the average American child spends more than 7.5 hours a day watching TV and movies, using cell phones and computers, and playing video games, and only a third of high school students get the recommended levels of physical activity.  Through public-private partnerships, and reforms of existing federal programs, the Administration will address this imbalance by:

Expanding and Modernizing the President’s Physical Fitness Challenge:  In the coming weeks, the President will be naming new members to the President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, housed at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  The council will be charged with increasing participation in the President’s Challenge and with modernizing and expanding it, so that it is consistent with the latest research and science.

Doubling the Number of Presidential Active Lifestyle Awards:  As part of the President’s Physical Fitness Council, the President will challenge both children and adults to commit to physical activity five days a week, for six weeks.  As part of the First Lady’s commitment to solve the problem of childhood obesity in a generation, the Council will double the number of children in the 2010-2011 school year who earn a “Presidential Active Lifestyle Award” for meeting this challenge. 

Safe and Healthy Schools: The U.S. Department of Education will be working with Congress on the creation of a Safe and Healthy Schools fund as part of the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary School Education Act this year.  This fund will support schools with comprehensive strategies to improve their school environment, including efforts to get children physically active in and outside of school, and improve the quality and availability of physical education.

Professional Sports: Professional athletes from twelve leagues including the NFL, MLB, WNBA, and MLS have joined the First Lady on the Let’s Move campaign and will promote “60 Minutes of Play a Day” through sports clinics, public service announcements, and more to help reach the national goal of solving the problem of childhood obesity in a generation.

 

Partnership for a Healthier America

Core to the success of this initiative is the recognition that government approaches alone will not solve this challenge. Achieving the goal will require engaging in partnerships with States, communities, and the non-profit and for-profit private sectors. To support this effort, several foundations are coming together to organize and fund a new central foundation – the Partnership for a Healthier America – to serve as a nonpartisan convener across the private, non-profit and public sectors to accelerate existing efforts addressing childhood obesity and to facilitate commitments towards the national goal of solving childhood obesity within a generation.  The Partnership for a Healthier America is being created by a number of leading health care foundations and childhood obesity non-profits, including the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, The California Endowment, W.K. Kellogg Foundation, The Alliance for Healthier Generation, Kaiser Permanente, and Nemours, and will seek to add new members in the days and months ahead.  For more.

 

 

 

President Obama Promotes Bipartisan Jobs Bill

 

President Obama is promoting a February 25 meeting with Democratic and Republican leaders to attempt to find a common approach to stimulating more jobs and to enacting health care reform.  For more.  Harry Reid has offered a compromise stimulus plan.  Republicans are faced with a dilemma.  If they meet, their ideas are likely to be exposed as not sufficient for either promoting job creation or reforming health care.  If they don’t meet, they are exposed as being opposed to bipartisan solutions.  It will be interesting to see whether they choose to meet.

 

Neither Congressional Republicans or Democrats Are Liberal

 

A majority of Americans are Liberal.  We believe that everyone should have equal freedoms and opportunities, that we are each responsible for guaranteeing this equality and that we should be competent and compassionate and we act accordingly.  Due to misrepresentation and demonization of the term ‘Liberal’, many deny that they are Liberals, even though their attitudes and activities are Liberal.

 

Republicans are Conservatives who do not believe in Liberal values.  To get elected by Liberal Americans, they must receive campaign contributions to be used to deceive the public.  Unfortunately, many Democratic Legislators are also elected due to campaign contributions given to them because they don’t act as Liberals.  They practice the ‘Old Politics’ which makes getting elected a higher priority than the “New Politics’ of serving the public.  These ‘Old Politics’ Democratic legislators favor Wall Street over Main Street and are fiscally irresponsible in refusing to tax Wall Street and other high income people.

 

During his campaign, President Obama spoke of ‘change we can believe in’, which means change from the ‘Old Politics’ of self interest to the ‘New Politics’ of public interest.   While others accused him of not having enough experience as a senator, he replied that being in the senate too long would teach him to practice ‘Old Politics’.  But it turns out that he was in the Senate long enough to learn to practice ‘Old Politics’.  Upon becoming president, he placed the Organizing for America group of his campaign contributors and supporters under the Democratic Party instead of keeping it under his management.  The result is that these supporters are unable to attack Democratic congress members who practice ‘Old Politics’.  Organize for America has thus had no impact upon producing health care reform.

 

In addition, President Obama recruited close advisors on both economic and health reform who practice ‘Old Politics’.  He has thus been unable to enact either economic or health care reform.  Unless he quickly changes to listen to ‘New Politics’ advisors, many Democratic congress members will be replaced by Republicans and needed reforms will not be made.  ‘New Politics’ advisors would advise him to harshly criticize and regulate Wall Street while stimulating Main Street jobs and advise him to practice fiscal responsibility as described in the next commentary below.  Doing this would smoke out Conservatives who would favor Wall Street and oppose fiscal responsibility.  At least some Tea Bag Conservatives would realize that it is President Obama who favors Main Street over Wall Street and fiscal responsibility instead of Republican congress members.

 

If I Could Dictate Fiscally Responsible Reforms

 

If I could dictate fiscally responsible reforms as PAYGO dictates to increase revenue and reduce costs to offset any tax cuts and cost increases, I would implement most or even all of the measures for increasing revenue that were presented in last week’s newsletter.  This would produce a large transfer of revenue from our wealthiest Wall Street and other high income earners to pay for measures to stimulate Main Street Jobs.

 

People fail to realize the enormous amounts of money possessed by the several percent of wealthiest people.  And they may believe as Conservatives proclaim that these people use their wealth to create jobs.  These wealthiest people have as much wealth and income as the bottom 50% of people and still will have plenty left after paying increased taxes. 

 

Paul Buchheit, from DePaul University, revealed, "From 1980 to 2006 the richest 1% of America tripled their after-tax percentage of our nation's total income, while the bottom 90% have seen their share drop over 20%." Robert Freeman added, "Between 2002 and 2006, it was even worse: an astounding three-quarters of all the economy's growth was captured by the top 1%."

Due to this, the United States already had the highest inequality of wealth in the industrialized world prior to the financial crisis. Since the crisis, which has hit the average worker much harder than CEO's, the gap between the top one percent and the remaining 99% of the US population has grown to a
record high. The economic top one percent of the population now owns over 70% of all financial assets, an all time record.

As mentioned before, just look at the first full year of the crisis when workers lost an average of
25 percent off their 401k. During the same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point clear, 400 people have more wealth than 155 million people combined.

 

They do not use this wealth to create Main Street jobs.  Instead they use it for consumption, often of luxury goods produced abroad.  And they use it for speculation, which must be curtailed.

 

In addition to these tax increases on our wealthiest people, I would eliminate wasteful spending in our military, agriculture and other programs.  For more.  I would eliminate many of the hundreds of our foreign military bases.  Most of these are not needed for fighting terrorism.  They only exist to impose our will on other countries.  I would also eliminate much military spending that is oriented against Cold War type sophisticated technology enemies of whom there are none in sight.  Military expenditures which would be kept relate to replenishing the equipment of our national guard and other first responders here at home, those which pay for our temporary presence in Iraq and Afghanistan and those which pay for other actions directly oriented toward countering terrorism.

 

Together, these tax increases and cutting of wasteful spending could provide enough revenue to offset all the stimulus programs needed to increase Main Street employment.  We could end up with a fiscally responsible zero federal deficit.  We would also end up with lower unemployment at the expense of speculation and the military-industrial complex.

 

As dictator, I could ignore the protests of Conservatives that I am raising taxes on our wealthiest people who create jobs.  Or I could respond to point out that they are the ones who are favoring Wall Street and other wealthy speculators over Main Street jobs.

 

My priorities for stimulus spending would be as follows:

·       Provision of federal money for health care and education such that all Americans have equal access to quality health care and quality services.  Having relieved states of paying for these, they would be able to maintain their previous job levels instead of forcing their unemployment.

·       Provision of federal money for infrastructure and green jobs, thus providing jobs, increasing the efficiency of our economy and reducing our contribution to global warming.

·       Provision of federal money to individuals in the form of extended unemployment benefits, increases in the earned income tax credit, larger food stamp allowances and similar measures to give Main Street people money to spend which creates the demand for private goods and services, resulting in more jobs.

 

In addition to these fiscally responsible PAYGO actions, I would also implement measures to provide health care to all, such as Medicare for all or simply adopting the Canadian system or one of those used by the various European countries.  I would reform Medicare to:

·       Require that every patient have a primary care physician that coordinates the treatment by specialists. 

·       Reward health care providers for the health outcomes they produce instead of the procedures that they apply.  This would result in preventive, treatment and hospice actions that assist patients instead of simply enriching health care providers. 

·       Eliminate regional differences in Medicare payments, setting them at the levels of regions with both excellent outcomes and low levels.

 

Thus more people would have jobs and they would not be faced with crippling health care bills and worse.  All of this having been done in a fiscally responsible manner.

 

Here’s the Beef

President Obama promotes jobs, PAYGO, Bipartisanship and more.

Democrats should pass 12 measures to increase transparency for voters, increase oversight of government actions and provide a closer examination of effectiveness and efficiency of government programs.

Republicans repeatedly oppose ideas that they say they support.

President Obama Should Make Recess Appointments to the National Labor Relations Board.

By delivering on jobs and health care legislation against Republican opposition, Democrats may do well in this fall’s elections.

The House and Senate ( prodded by President Obama) may be ready to use reconciliation procedures to pass health care reform.

Senator Bernie Sanders call for use of reconciliation as Republicans did to pass their tax cuts.

Four senators call for including a public option in a reconciliation bill.

A reconciliation bill may be ready for action after President Obama meets with Republicans.

At the beginning of the next session, cloture rules may change to make it easier to stop filibusters.  For more.

President Obama’s favorability rating holds steady.  Republicans are not gaining in favorability.

President Obama just doesn’t get it.  He must favor Main Street instead of Wall Street.  For more.

It’s not just President Obama’s fault.  There is no Liberal mass movement to favor Main Street.  For more.

Unless President Obama starts promoting ‘New Politics’, he may not be re-elected.

A more Liberal Democrat should compete with President Obama in 2012, perhaps Howard Dean.

Few strong Democratic candidates are willing to run for vacant congressional seats.

Senator Evan Bayh may be replaced by a Liberal Democrat.

Instead of our Federal Reserve, our Treasury Department may oversee systemic risks.

Liberals are promoting a transaction tax to reduce speculation.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid should force Republicans to filibuster a jobs bill, so Americans know that Republicans don’t favor Main Street.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says Iran is changing from religious to military dictatorship.

 

State and Local

 

State Legislators Fail to Pass Two Important Bills

 

State legislators fail to counter BIAW and fail to pass public campaign financing, in spite of House Speaker Frank Chopp promising to do both.

 

Here’s the Beef

Pacific Northwest businesses lobby congress to pass comprehensive clean energy bill.

Our Pacific Northwest small snowpack may not be the result of global warming.

 

Nation and World  

 

Value of Dollar and Cost of Oil

 

Greece has large deficits and to a lesser extent, so do Spain, Portugal and Italy.  Reacting to this, the value of the euro has fallen relative to the dollar.  In spite of the increased value of the dollar, the price of oil is still over $70 a barrel.  Now that other European countries may assist Greece and other countries to reduce their deficits, the value of the dollar may fall again.  If so, we can expect oil prices to increase. 

 

A fall in the value of the dollar assists our trade balance and job creation by increasing exports and decreasing imports.  The associated increase in the cost of oil has the benefit of discouraging its use and the negative effect of giving money to foreign oil providers which would otherwise create American demand for jobs.  For more.  For more.

 

Featured Advocacy Group

-------------------------------------- Avaaz.Org ---------------------------------------

 

Avaaz.org is a new global web movement with a simple democratic mission: to close the gap between the world we have, and the world most people everywhere want. Across the world, most people want stronger protections for the environment, greater respect for human rights, and concerted efforts to end poverty, corruption and war. Yet globalization faces a huge democratic deficit as international decisions are shaped by political elites and unaccountable corporations -- not the views and values of the world’s people.

Technology and the internet have allowed citizens to connect and mobilize like never before. The rise of a new model of internet-driven, people-powered politics is changing countries from Australia to the Philippines to the United States. Avaaz takes this model global, connecting people across borders to bring people powered politics to international decision-making.

Coming together in this way, Avaaz has become a community of people from all nations, backgrounds, and ages. Its diverse community is brought together by its care for the world, and a desire to do what it can to make it a better place.

 

The core of its model of organizing is its email list, operated in 13 languages. By signing up to receive its alerts, you are rapidly alerted to urgent global issues and opportunities to achieve change. Avaaz members respond by rapidly combining the small amounts of time or money they can give into a powerful collective force. In just hours it can send hundreds of thousands of messages to political leaders telling them to save a crucial summit on climate change , hold hundreds of rallies across the world calling for action to prevent a genocide, or donate hundreds of thousands of euros, dollars and yen to support nonviolent protest in Burma. Click here to see a list of its campaigns and impact in 2007.

In less than three years, Avaaz.org has grown to over 3.5 million members, and have begun to make a real impact on global politics. The Economist writes that Avaaz is poised to deliver “a deafening wake up call” to world leaders, the Indian Express welcomes “the biggest web campaigner across the world” and Nobel Prize winner Al Gore says “Avaaz is inspiring, and has already begun to make a difference.”

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Here’s the Beef

Major private health insurer tries to justify enormous increase in rates.

State legislators publicize private health insurer’s abuses.

Various local foundations fund large workers’ cooperative which creates green jobs.

North Dakota’s state owned bank is funding jobs and drawing attention from other states.

Media ignores excellent health care provided Haitians by Cuba.

5 reasons to reject guaranteeing money spent for nuclear power plant construction.

Our risk of dying from a terrorist downing an airplane is far less that other risks.

 

Our Liberal Spirit

 

 

My Paradigm Shift

 

About a month ago, I learned more about what the Tea Bag Conservatives were criticizing and realized that President Obama had not clearly distanced himself from their criticism.  Before that, I had believed that because President Obama was able to win election to the presidency, he knew how to assist congressional Democrat to win elections this coming fall. 

 

But I suddenly realized that while President Obama had won election based upon promising ‘Change we can believe in.’, he had not governed that way.  Based upon advice from the closest advisors he appointed, he allowed the ‘Old Politics’ of self interest to continue, instead of fighting for the ‘New Politics’ of public interest.  He did not clearly indicate that he favored Main Street over Wall Street and did not implement fiscally responsible policies, thus providing the window for criticism by Tea Bag Conservatives.  He hobbled his campaign contributors by placing them in Organizing for America under the Democratic Party where they could not campaign for ‘New Politics’ with respect to regulating Wall Street speculators, reforming health care and other reforms. 

 

This was my paradigm shift.  But I still believe that President Obama has time to demonstrate both his favoring of Main Street over Wall Street and fiscal responsibility, such that Congressional Democrats can win elections this fall.

 

What does this have to do with our behavior amidst the freedoms and opportunities that we have or don’t have?  If we obtain new information or insights into our freedoms and opportunities, we should consider shifting our paradigm, instead of maintaining our previous false assumptions.

 

Recommended Books – See our list of books for liberals

 

Dean Baker, 2010, False Profits.  Recovering from the Bubble Economy

 

This book is should be read by President Obama and all others who favor Main Street over Wall Street and will benefit from exposing Conservative hypocrisy on this issue.  It reminds us of John Kenneth Galbraith’s continual reminders that financial self interest blinds economists, government officials and legislators to the truth.  Dean Baker demonstrates that our speculative bubble and collapse should have been easily identified and prevented.  But our Federal Reserve and other officials, legislators and even most economists failed to do this. 

 

Any response to the credit collapse caused by Wall Street’s speculative credit bubble should not reward Wall Street large financial corporations nor enable them to continue their speculation.  But TARP and other Federal Reserve programs both rewarded Wall Street and enabled it to continue its speculation, all without providing credit for justifiable Main Street loans and without reducing foreclosures or ameliorating their effects.

 

Dean Baker demonstrates that the TARP bailout of large financial firms should have be done differently by taking ownership of them, wiping out their shareholders, refusing to pay huge bonuses (Wall Street argued that these bonuses were protected because they were contractual, but they were willing to allow union wage contracts to be dishonored.), and  restricting their speculative activities.  The United Kingdom imposed such restrictions as part of their bailouts.  Foreclosures could have been limited and people whose mortgages were foreclosed could have been allowed to continue their occupancy as renters.  This would have punished Wall Street and helped Main Street.

 

In addition to TARP, the Federal Reserve gave secret loans to large financial companies without conditions, thus rewarding them and allowing them to continue their speculative activities.  Dean Baker indicates that these were both unnecessary and harmful. 

 

Ordinarily when a firm becomes bankrupt, any firms that it owes money fail to receive it.  Our government had no obligation to pay the money that AIG owed.  In bailing out AIG, TARP was really bailing out the large financial firms and others who had unwisely contracted with AIG which failed to have the capital to honor its contracts.  Even if AIG was bailed out, it should have only paid out a percentage of what it owed.

 

One of the arguments for the TARP bailouts was a supposed collapse of the commercial paper market through which non-financial firms raised capital.  Dean Baker indicates that the commercial paper market had not collapsed and that the Federal Reserve had the authority to buy commercial paper.

 

In summary, by not using TARP and Federal Reserve lending to restrict Wall Street Speculation, our Federal Reserve and Obama Administration favored Wall Street over Main Street.  They aggravated our economic collapse and justified outrage by Tea Party Conservatives and others at this misplaced favoritism.  For more.  Unless the Obama Administration quickly reverses course to regulate Wall Street, congressional Democrats will be punished this fall. 

 

es'>  It reminds us of John Kenneth Galbraith’s continual reminders that financial self interest blinds economists, government officials and legislators to the truth.  Dean Baker demonstrates that our speculative bubble and collapse should have been easily identified and prevented.  But our Federal Reserve and other officials, legislators and even most economists failed to do this. 

 

Any response to the credit collapse caused by Wall Street’s speculative credit bubble should not reward Wall Street large financial corporations nor enable them to continue their speculation.  But TARP and other Federal Reserve programs both rewarded Wall Street and enabled it to continue its speculation, all without providing credit for justifiable Main Street loans and without reducing foreclosures or ameliorating their effects.

 

Dean Baker demonstrates that the TARP bailout of large financial firms should have be done differently by taking ownership of them, wiping out their shareholders, refusing to pay huge bonuses (Wall Street argued that these bonuses were protected because they were contractual, but they were willing to allow union wage contracts to be dishonored.), and  restricting their speculative activities.  The United Kingdom imposed such restrictions as part of their bailouts.  Foreclosures could have been limited and people whose mortgages were foreclosed could have been allowed to continue their occupancy as renters.  This would have punished Wall Street and helped Main Street.

 

In addition to TARP, the Federal Reserve gave secret loans to large financial companies without conditions, thus rewarding them and allowing them to continue their speculative activities.  Dean Baker indicates that these were both unnecessary and harmful. 

 

Ordinarily when a firm becomes bankrupt, any firms that it owes money fail to receive it.  Our government had no obligation to pay the money that AIG owed.  In bailing out AIG, TARP was really bailing out the large financial firms and others who had unwisely contracted with AIG which failed to have the capital to honor its contracts.  Even if AIG was bailed out, it should have only paid out a percentage of what it owed.

 

One of the arguments for the TARP bailouts was a supposed collapse of the commercial paper market through which non-financial firms raised capital.  Dean Baker indicates that the commercial paper market had not collapsed and that the Federal Reserve had the authority to buy commercial paper.

 

In summary, by not using TARP and Federal Reserve lending to restrict Wall Street Speculation, our Federal Reserve and Obama Administration favored Wall Street over Main Street.  They aggravated our economic collapse and justified outrage by Tea Party Conservatives and others at this misplaced favoritism.  For more.  Unless the Obama Administration quickly reverses course to regulate Wall Street, congressional Democrats will be punished this fall. 

 

play:none;mso-hide:all'> 

html>