Organizing Our Democratic Party’s Grassroots Efforts

The Urgency

Our electronic networks of liberal bloggers and organizations like MoveOn have aroused 5 to 10 million impassioned liberals, raised money and created publicity for liberal causes.  But these do not reach the other 90% of liberal voters, especially those who are least politically passionate.  To stimulate these to vote, canvassing is necessary.  Canvassing requires grassroots organizing.

 

Only a small proportion of our precincts have PCOs and only a small proportion of these PCOs actually canvass their precincts to identify likely Democratic voters and stimulate them to vote.  Most canvassing efforts are last minute forays by a few volunteers for various candidates visiting previously identified likely Democratic voters to encourage their support for single candidates.  There are virtually no attempts to look beyond the immediate elections to make precincts ones where Democrats thrive and multiply.  With any effective opposition, we could never elect anyone.

 

Karl Rove has organized neighborhood conservative Christian churches in targeted neighborhoods to identify and stimulate likely Republican voters to vote, and to make the neighborhoods ones in which conservatives thrive and multiply.  Democrats have had no similar network of neighborhood organizations.  To counter Rove’s very effective activity, Democrats must develop effective neighborhood organizations.  The role of our PCOs and other liberal activists is crucial to enabling Democrats to win elections.

 

As they stand now, the only reason we have had recent successes is that Washington State Republicans are also disorganized and their conduct has been so terrible that most voters oppose them.  If Republicans get their act together and Karl Rove targets Washington in 2008, we could lose many of our gains.  We urgently need to reorganize our Washington State Democratic Party’s grassroots efforts. 

 

Forty Percent of Democratic voters aren’t Democrats

Note that American voters identify themselves as approximately one third each: Democrats, Independents and Republicans.  Democrats and two thirds of Independents hold liberal values, with the Liberal Independents being about as consistently liberal as the Liberal Democrats.  Republicans and one third of Independents hold conservative values.  Conservatives include Traditional Conservatives, Libertarians and Religious Conservatives.  Virtually all Liberals vote for Democrats while virtually all Conservatives vote for Republicans, with a small proportion of Liberals and Conservatives voting for other smaller political parties.

 

Thus forty percent of likely Democratic voters consider themselves to be Independents instead of Democrats.  Likely Democratic voters include about 60% Liberal Democrats and about 40% Liberal Independents.  To maximize votes for Democratic candidates, we must stimulate all liberals (both Democrats and Independents) to vote.  We may assume that these national statistics apply to Washington State with more Liberals in urban and suburban areas and more Conservatives in rural, small town and exurban areas.  We can treat ‘likely Democratic voters’ and ‘Liberals’ as synonyms.  We must reach beyond Democrats to identify liberal Independents and stimulate them to vote.

 

Organizing Neighborhood Precinct Clusters

We must first recognize that while a legislative district is too large for effective grass roots organizing, a precinct is too small.  A small precinct with a lonely PCO doesn’t have enough human resources and motivation to canvass and do other neighborhood development activities.  We need to identify neighborhoods with teams of PCOs to organize them, especially since we don’t have PCOs for many of the precincts.  We must augment our PCO teams with other passionate liberals.  As much as possible, the neighborhood should be defined to be large enough and small enough (perhaps between 10 and 20 precincts) that its residents can identify and bond with each other.  We have successfully done this in the Lake Hills Neighborhood in Bellevue, consisting of 12 precincts in our 48th Legislative District.

 

Our vision for our neighborhood precinct clusters has two parts. 

1.    To identify likely Democratic voters and stimulate them to vote

2.    To create a political environment within which likely Democratic voters thrive and multiply.

As likely Democratic voters are identified, the ones who are most passionate about politics should be organized to become well informed through a newsletter and to participate with each other in various neighborhood enhancement and political activities. 

 

Creating a Whirlpool

Imagine a series of concentric circles, with passionately involved Democrats in the center, the next ring containing less involved but passionate liberals, the next ring containing less passionate identified likely Democratic voters and the outside containing unidentified likely Democratic voters.  Our hope is to create a whirlpool in which likely Democratic voters in each ring are enticed into a ring closer to the center.  They are enticed by becoming aware of opportunities for becoming effective participants who perform challenging and enjoyable tasks relevant to realizing their liberal values.

 

Our Lake Hills Neighborhood consists of 12 precincts.  As the result of our canvassing during the  summer of 2006, we have 1700 identified likely Democratic voters, with 30% (500) of them members of our Lake Hills Liberals who receive our weekly newsletter.  Thirty of these have been active in canvassing or other activities.

 

Obstacles

Many obstacles to our vision exist.  We typically have little detailed information about our legislative district, its neighborhoods, precincts, voters, organizations, leaders.  We haven’t defined neighborhoods.  We don’t have a database of registered voters, with voters identified as to voting orientation and involvement in our politics activities.  Many of our precincts have no PCOs.  Our PCOs are often untrained and unmotivated, lack specific assignments and are not held accountable.  We haven’t identified many of our likely Democratic voters, organized the more passionate ones, identified their skills and matched them with needed tasks (which also have not been identified).  We haven’t identified, recruited and trained our supporters, candidates, fund raisers, etc.  We haven’t established mentoring relationships with other similar more successful districts or individuals.

 

Strategies

To overcome these obstacles, we must:

·       Obtain and use knowledge of our district to define neighborhoods

·       Create a database of registered voters to record our likely Democratic voters, the more active ones, their skills, their assignments, etc.

·       Create a communication system for informing and involving our supporters

·       Organize, train and supervise neighborhood development teams (including PCOs and other active supporters)

·       Identify, organize and train potential candidates, fund raisers, mentors, etc.

·       Create a support network

·       These can all be implemented and become self sustaining.

 

Legislative District Planning

·       A planning session is needed which includes as many active supporters as possible, in which our vision, obstacles, and strategies are reviewed and elaborated. 

·       The supporters would then be organized into task groups to specify tactics to achieve district strategies (what activities, when done, by whom (assignments), with what resources (people, money, in-kind, etc.).

·       The supporters would then be reorganized into neighborhood teams to specify neighborhood tactics and receive training about canvassing and other neighborhood development activities.

·       Create a timeline (schedule) with vertical rows for who, horizontal columns for when and cells containing tactical activity and resources.  Indicate campaigns consisting of related tactics with time for successful completion.  Note dependencies and adjust times.

·       For each time period, total resource (people, money, etc.) needs and compare with available resources.  Make necessary time adjustments.

·       Create a performance organization, make assignments, and create regular follow-up meetings for checking performance and adjusting tactics and timeline.

 

Define Neighborhoods

Using a precinct map of the Legislative District, people who know the district should define and name neighborhoods of 10 to 20 precincts.  Together the neighborhoods must be mutually exclusive and exhaustive of the Legislative District.  It is helpful if the defined neighborhoods are natural in that their residents already identify with the neighborhood.  Ask for each neighborhood, will it have enough talented liberals to successfully work together to achieve our vision?  Is it small enough that people can bond with each other through shared activities?  Identify some of the useful resources, such as meeting places (libraries, schools, churches, and coffee bars).

Inventory liberal individuals, including active Democrats and others and liberal groups.  An example would be a Unitarian church and other churches with liberal outreach committees.  Note activities that might be conducted to bring liberals together.  List the initial members of the neighborhood teams (PCOs and others)

 

Create a Registered Voter Database

There are national and state voter databases, but these are inadequate and inconvenient.  They only contain a small proportion of likely Democratic voters.  The quality of the data is poor.  Much of it is obsolete.  Accessibility and manipulability are difficult.  It is not difficult to create a separate database for each legislative data.  They data should be shared with both state officials and legislative candidates.

 

A database of registered voters for each neighborhood should include fields for noting each voter’s name, address, phone number, email address, voting orientation, and participation in Democratic activities.  Our county voter registration department supplies names and addresses.  Some phone numbers appear on lists from Labels and Lists.  Others must be looked up. 

Three possible sources exist for identifying voting orientation:

·       those who have displayed partisan yard signs

·       those who are on lists from Labels and Lists

·       those who are on Democratic Party walking lists

·       canvassing the majority of candidates who haven’t been identified in the first three ways

After the initial canvassing, newcomers must be continuously canvassed.  All residents should be canvassed at least once every two years.

 

Neighborhood Precinct Cluster Team (PCO) Training

Any training of individuals or groups to perform activities must begin with defining the context in which these activities occur.  The training may occur as part of the legislative district planning.  Having defined neighborhoods consisting of 10-20 precincts, having defined our vision and created a plan for our neighborhoods, and having assigned PCOs and other supporters to neighborhood teams for each neighborhood, we are now ready to train these neighborhood teams. 

 

The Neighborhood Team’s Mission

The mission is to counter Karl Rove’s network of conservative Christian churches by creating our own network of neighborhood organizations.  This mission is crucial to continuing our electoral successes.  Each team should work together to realize our immediate vision for our neighborhood of identifying likely Democratic voters and stimulating them to vote.  Their long term mission is also to ensure that these voters are well informed and participate in creating an atmosphere in which likely Democratic voters thrive and multiply.    They will work within their neighborhood as a team to realize the plan.  Each member is responsible for doing what is needed to realize the whole neighborhood development vision. Crucial to this vision is first identifying all the likely Democratic voters.

 

Canvassing Procedures

Having identified some voters as likely Republican or likely Democratic voters from the sources above, we must canvass the others to identify their voting orientation.  In Lake Hills, we have found that the following script and procedure works.

 

Knock. Knock.  Hello, I’m Dave Thomas.  I am your neighbor.

 

I am visiting because I am disgusted with President Bush and Republican congress members.

 

I am looking for people who think pretty much the same.

 

If the house is vacant (V), the resident indicates he or she supports Republicans (R), is politically cynical (C), isn’t a citizen (X), leave quickly, hoping that the Republicans will forget you came and that there are ever any elections.  Cynics are those who say they don’t want anything to do with politics, all politicians are crooks, there is no difference between the parties, my vote won’t matter, etc.

 

If they indicate they vote for the best candidate or otherwise don’t identify as Democratic or Republican voters, ask which party’s candidates they most often vote for.  If that doesn’t get an answer, ask how they feel about several partisan issues.  Then decide if you want them to receive our literature (D) or don’t (R).  Only 5% or fewer should be recorded as undecided (U). 

If the resident notes that he or she usually votes for Democrats (D), give them a generic Democratic brochure. (See at the end of this newsletter.) They usually express their thanks.  Get the names of all voters in the household.  Provide mail-in registration forms for any who aren’t registered.  Ask for their phone number.

 

If they appear politically passionate, inform them that we have a liberals organization and ask for their email address, so we can send them our newsletter.  If they respond favorably, record them on a separate column as S for supporter.  Contact supporters later to find out how they might become involved.

 

The best time to catch people at home is 4 to 9 in the evening or on weekends.  But enough people are at home during the day that canvassing then is still worthwhile.  In residential neighborhoods, it should be possible to typically identify several households containing four likely Democrats per hour, a dozen in a typical 2 hour canvassing session.

 

In Lake Hills last summer, we spent about 250 hours canvassing about 1200 homes to identify 600 homes containing 1000 likely Democratic voters, which added to our 700 previously identified ones totaled 1700 whose names and addresses we shared with all 5 of our Democratic candidates for them to follow up.  Of the 1000, 300 joined the 200 previous members of our Lake Hills Liberals for a total of 500 who receive our newsletter.  We later visited the 400 homes containing previously identified likely Democratic voters to give them our brochures.

 

Imagine that each Puget Sound Democratic candidate had received such information about likely Democratic voters in his or her district.  Our candidates received 2 to 8% more votes than in the district as a whole.  We hope to achieve even more over time.

 

The canvasser needs a clipboard, a walking list of unidentified voters for identifying houses and recording information, generic brochures, and registration forms.  We also had descriptions of our Lake Hills Liberals group to give to those we signed up for our newsletter and a guide to social services (published by the city of Kirkland) which we gave to newcomers to our neighborhood.

 

Role Playing

Training should include role playing.  Have each of the trainees be a Republican, Cynic, Democrat or uncertain voter.  Then have each trainee interview each of these types. 

 

Other Neighborhood Development Tasks

While the emphasis should be upon canvassing and the follow-up to communicate with the identified liberals and attempt to involve them in our activities, other neighborhood and legislative district development activities might be mentioned.  For examples, see our Lake Hills Liberals newsletter below.  One of the reasons, I am hopeful that many neighborhood liberals organizations will be formed, is that each may find new effective neighborhood development tactics.  For more.

 

For More.